| Literature DB >> 28793886 |
S N Kehlet1,2, C L Bager3, N Willumsen4, B Dasgupta5, C Brodmerkel5, M Curran5, S Brix6, D J Leeming4, M A Karsdal4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Decorin is one of the most abundant proteoglycans of the extracellular matrix and is mainly secreted and deposited in the interstitial matrix by fibroblasts where it plays an important role in collagen turnover and tissue homeostasis. Degradation of decorin might disturb normal tissue homeostasis contributing to extracellular matrix remodeling diseases. Here, we present the development and validation of a competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) quantifying a specific fragment of degraded decorin, which has potential as a novel non-invasive serum biomarker for fibrotic lung disorders.Entities:
Keywords: Cancer; Cathepsin-S; Decorin; Extracellular matrix; Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis; Serum biomarker
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28793886 PMCID: PMC5550991 DOI: 10.1186/s12890-017-0455-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Pulm Med ISSN: 1471-2466 Impact factor: 3.317
Synthetic peptides used for development and validation of the DCN-CS ELISA assay
| Peptide name | Amino acid sequence |
|---|---|
| Selection/standard peptide | VPKDLPPDTT |
| Immunogenic peptide | VPKDLPPDTT-KLH |
| Biotinylated coating peptide | VPKDLPPDTT-biotin |
| Elongated peptide | KVPKDLPPDTT |
| Non-sense selection peptide | DSSAPKAAQA |
| Non-sense coating peptide | biotin-DSSAPKAAQA |
| Wnt-11 peptide | VPKDLDIRPV |
| Podocan peptide | VPKHLPPALY |
Clinical sample overview and patients demographics
| Cohort | Samples | No. of subjects | Mean age (range) | Gender, % females | Tumor stage I | Tumor stage II | Tumor stage III | Tumor stage IV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NSCLC patients | 8 | 61 (47–77) | 12.8 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2 |
| 1 | IPF patients | 8 | 74 (55–82) | 62.5 | - | - | - | - |
| 1 | COPD patients | 8 | 75 (69–82) | 50.0 | - | - | - | - |
| 1 | Colonoscopy-negative controls | 8 | 55 (44–65) | 75.0 | - | - | - | - |
| 1 | Healthy controls | 20 | 34 (20–51) | 10.0 | - | - | - | - |
| 2 | NSCLC patientsa | 12 | 60 (47–80) | 25.0 | 5 | 2 | 4 | - |
| 2 | SCLC patients | 8 | 61 (54–82) | 25.0 | 3 | 1 | 4 | - |
| 2 | Healthy controls | 43 | 71 (60–82) | 100.0 | - | - | - | - |
| 3 | IPF patients | 116 | 65 (43–80) | 21.5 | - | - | - | - |
| 3 | Healthy controls | 38 | 34 (20–58) | 10.5 | - | - | - | - |
aNo tumor stage information of one patient
Fig. 1Specificity of the DCN-CS monoclonal antibody. Monoclonal antibody reactivity towards the standard peptide (VPKDLPPDTT), the elongated peptide (KVPKDLPPDTT), a non-sense peptide (DSSAPKAAQA) and a non-sense coating peptide (biotin-DSSAPKAAQA) was tested for in the competitive DCN-CS ELISA assay. Signals are shown as optical density (OD) at 450 nm (subtracted the background at 650 nm) as a function of peptide concentration
Fig. 2Cleavage of decorin by Cathepsin-S. Degraded decorin levels were measured after 1 h and 24 h incubation of human recombinant decorin with Cathepsin-S. Data were normalized by subtracting the background measured in buffer alone. The experiment was repeated twice and data are shown as the mean of the two replicates with standard deviation
Technical validation data of the DCN-CS ELISA assay
| Tecnical validation step | DCN-CS performance |
|---|---|
| Detection range (LLOD-ULOD) | 1.2–345.3 ng/mL |
| Lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) | 5.3 ng/mL |
| Intra-assay variation | 3% |
| Inter-assay variation | 13% |
| Dilution of serum samples | 1:4 |
| Dilution recovery (1:4 pre-dilution)a | 100% (82–113%) |
| Freeze/thaw recovery (4 cycles)a | 94% (90–97%) |
| Analyte stability up to 24 h, 4 °Ca | 87% (86–90%) |
| Interference Lipids, low/high | 107%/86% |
| Interference Biotin, low/high | 100%/100% |
| Interference Hemoglobin, low/high | 100%/100% |
aPercentages are reported as mean with range shown in brackets
Fig. 3Serum DCN-CS levels in patients with fibrotic lung disorders. Serum DCN-CS was assessed in three independent cohorts: Cohort 1 included patients with NSCLC (n = 8), IPF (n = 8), COPD (n = 8), colonoscopy-negative controls (CNC) (n = 8) and a panel of healthy controls (HC) (n = 20). Data were compared using one-way ANOVA adjusted for Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. Cohort 2 consisted of patients with NSCLC (n = 12), SCLC (n = 8) and healthy controls (HC) (n = 43). Data were compared using Kruskal-Wallis adjusted for Dunn’s multiple comparisons test. Cohort 3 comprised serum samples from patients diagnosed with IPF (n = 116) and healthy controls (HC) (n = 38). Groups were compared using unpaired, two-tailed Mann-Whitney test. Data are shown as Tukey box plots. Significance levels: ***: p < 0.001 and ****: p < 0.0001
Discriminative performance of DCN-CS in NSCLC and IPF
| Cut-off value (ng/mL) | Sensitivity | Specificity | AUROC (95% CI) |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NSCLC vs. healthy controls | 21.5 | 90.0 | 100.0 | 0.96 (0.90–0.99) | <0.0001 |
| IPF vs. healthy controls | 8.9 | 62.9 | 82.7 | 0.77 (0.71–0.83) | <0.0001 |
Fig. 4ROC curve analysis. Roc curve analysis was used to evaluate the ability of DCN-CS to discriminate between patients and healthy controls. The preliminary estimated cut-off values for the reported sensitivity/specificity are marked with a red asterix