| Literature DB >> 28793668 |
Nader Shehata1,2,3, Michael Clavel4, Kathleen Meehan5, Effat Samir6,7, Soha Gaballah8,9, Mohammed Salah10,11.
Abstract
This paper discusses the effect of adding reduced erbium-doped ceria nanoparticles (REDC NPs) as a coating on silicon solar cells. Reduced ceria nanoparticles doped with erbium have the advantages of both improving conductivity and optical conversion of solar cells. Oxygen vacancies in ceria nanoparticles reduce Ce4+ to Ce3+ which follow the rule of improving conductivity of solar cells through the hopping mechanism. The existence of Ce3+ helps in the down-conversion from 430 nm excitation to 530 nm emission. The erbium dopant forms energy levels inside the low-phonon ceria host to up-convert the 780 nm excitations into green and red emissions. When coating reduced erbium-doped ceria nanoparticles on the back side of a solar cell, a promising improvement in the solar cell efficiency has been observed from 15% to 16.5% due to the mutual impact of improved electric conductivity and multi-optical conversions. Finally, the impact of the added coater on the electric field distribution inside the solar cell has been studied.Entities:
Keywords: ceria nanoparticles; conductivity; erbium dopant; solar cells; up-conversion
Year: 2015 PMID: 28793668 PMCID: PMC5458927 DOI: 10.3390/ma8115399
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1(a) Absorbance dispersion curves for reduced nanoparticles (REDC NPs) annealed at 700 °C and the non-reduced nanoparticles (EDC NPs); (b) the corresponding direct band gap of both REDC NPs and EDC NPs.
Figure 2(a) TEM image and (b) XRD pattern of REDC NPs at annealing temperature of 700 °C.
Figure 3Emission spectrum of REDC NPs under simultaneous excitations of both near-UV (430 nm) and IR (780 nm) excitations.
Figure 4(a) Surface profile of coated cell at the edge between coating and the electrode and (b) the profile distribution with the intensity map.
Figure 5(a) P–V curve and (b) I–V curve of silicon solar cells in both the uncoated (normal) case and those coated with REDC NPs.
Comparison between coated and un-coated cells.
| Condition | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Uncoated | 0.5155 | 0.1537 | 0.6301 | 15.1075 |
| coated cell | 0.5095 | 0.1718 | 0.6322 | 16.7452 |
Figure 6Normalized generation rate of silicon cells with/without REDC NP coating layer.
Figure 7Electric field distribution (a) before and (b) after REDC NP coating.
Figure 8Up- and down-conversion fluorescence setup.