| Literature DB >> 28793020 |
Argemiro Sanavria1, Claudia Bezerra da Silva2, Érica Heleno Electo1, Lidiane Cristina Rocha Nogueira1, Sandra Maria Gomes Thomé1, Isabele da Costa Angelo1, Gilmar Ferreira Vita3, Talles Eduardo Cabral Sanavria4, Elisa Domingues Padua1, Denise Glória Gaiotte1.
Abstract
The aim of this research was to monitor the presence of females of Aedes aegypti (Linnaeus, 1762) on the Seropédica municipality, Rio de Janeiro State, from 2010 to 2013. For this purpose, the Intelligent Dengue Monitoring (IM-Dengue) and Intelligent Virus Monitoring (IM-Virus) developed by Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (Ecovec - Minas Gerais, Brazil), were used. IM-Dengue is a tool that allows achieving a weekly overview of A. aegypti infestation, while IM-Virus is another tool that allows detecting dengue virus directly from the mosquito, by Real Time-PCR. Both tools were developed for diagnosis in a prepathogenesis period of the disease, before infection occurrence. Traps were distributed in 19 locations inside the municipality and the bugs were collected weekly during the years of the research. As a result, the presence of 163 females of A. aegypti was recorded over the period; there was no circulation of the virus in the municipality. In one of the 19 study sites, a high degree of disease transmission risk was verified. The study concluded that the municipality, as a whole, showed no risk of disease transmission throughout the field research period.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28793020 PMCID: PMC5626224 DOI: 10.1590/S1678-9946201759051
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo ISSN: 0036-4665 Impact factor: 1.846
Figure 1Map showing the trap location and each trap ID number, Seropédica Municipality, Rio de Janeiro -State
Number of inspected traps, collected females of Aedes aegypti (IFMA), by deployed locations (ID), Seropédica municipality, RJ, from 2010 to 2013
| Years | IDs | Number of traps inspected | Number of | IFMA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 |
| 2 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | |
| 3 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | |
| 4 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | |
| 5 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | |
| 6 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | |
| 7 | 2 | 0 | 0.50 | |
| 8 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | |
| 9 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | |
| 10 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | |
| 11 | 1 | 2 | 2.00 | |
| 12 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | |
| 13 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | |
| 14 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | |
| 15 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | |
| 16 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | |
| 17 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | |
| 18 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | |
| 19 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | |
| 2011 | 1 | 50 | 47 | 0.94 |
| 2 | 50 | 3 | 0.06 | |
| 3 | 50 | 0 | 0.00 | |
| 4 | 50 | 0 | 0.00 | |
| 5 | 50 | 2 | 0.04 | |
| 6 | 50 | 2 | 0.04 | |
| 7 | 50 | 2 | 0.04 | |
| 8 | 50 | 1 | 0.02 | |
| 9 | 50 | 0 | 0.00 | |
| 10 | 50 | 4 | 0.08 | |
| 11 | 50 | 2 | 0.04 | |
| 12 | 50 | 2 | 0.04 | |
| 13 | 50 | 0 | 0.00 | |
| 14 | 50 | 0 | 0.00 | |
| 15 | 50 | 3 | 0.06 | |
| 16 | 50 | 0 | 0.00 | |
| 17 | 50 | 1 | 0.02 | |
| 18 | 50 | 3 | 0.06 | |
| 19 | 37 | 1 | 0.02 | |
| 2012 | 1 | 49 | 43 | 0.87 |
| 2 | 49 | 4 | 0.08 | |
| 2012 | 3 | 48 | 0 | 0.00 |
| 4 | 49 | 3 | 0.06 | |
| 5 | 49 | 2 | 0.04 | |
| 6 | 49 | 2 | 0.04 | |
| 7 | 49 | 0 | 0.00 | |
| 8 | 49 | 3 | 0.06 | |
| 9 | 48 | 1 | 0.02 | |
| 10 | 49 | 3 | 0.06 | |
| 11 | 48 | 2 | 0.04 | |
| 12 | 47 | 1 | 0.02 | |
| 13 | 49 | 0 | 0.00 | |
| 14 | 49 | 0 | 0.00 | |
| 15 | 49 | 1 | 0.02 | |
| 16 | 48 | 0 | 0.00 | |
| 17 | 49 | 2 | 0.04 | |
| 18 | 48 | 1 | 0.02 | |
| 19 | 49 | 2 | 0.04 | |
| 2013 | 1 | 16 | 15 | 0.93 |
| 2 | 16 | 1 | 0.06 | |
| 3 | 16 | 0 | 0.00 | |
| 4 | 16 | 0 | 0.00 | |
| 5 | 16 | 0 | 0.00 | |
| 6 | 16 | 1 | 0.06 | |
| 7 | 16 | 0 | 0.00 | |
| 8 | 16 | 0 | 0.00 | |
| 9 | 16 | 1 | 0.06 | |
| 10 | 16 | 0 | 0.00 | |
| 11 | 16 | 0 | 0.00 | |
| 12 | 16 | 0 | 0.00 | |
| 13 | 16 | 0 | 0.00 | |
| 14 | 16 | 0 | 0.00 | |
| 15 | 16 | 0 | 0.00 | |
| 16 | 16 | 0 | 0.00 | |
| 17 | 16 | 0 | 0.00 | |
| 18 | 16 | 0 | 0.00 | |
| 19 | 16 | 0 | 0.00 | |
| Total | 2,197 | 163 | 0.07* | |
| * IMFA average total of the municipality of
| ||||
Total number of collected mosquitoes during the period from December 2010 to 2013, in the studied locations of the Seropédica municipality, RJ, with the determination of species and sex
| Species | Sex | Years | Total | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | |||
|
| Male | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Female | 1 | 25 | 7 | 3 | 36 | |
|
| Male | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 5 |
| Female | 2 | 73 | 70 | 18 | 163 | |
|
| Male | 0 | 11 | 5 | 14 | 30 |
| Female | 11 | 233 | 335 | 126 | 705 | |
|
| Male | 9 | 180 | 154 | 47 | 390 |
| Female | 23 | 323 | 443 | 123 | 912 | |
| Total | 48 | 848 | 1,016 | 331 | 2,243 | |
Figure 2Number of collected females of Aedes aegypti, by epidemiologic week, during the period from December 2010 to April 2013, in 19 locations from the Seropédica municipality, RJ
Figure 3Average index of females of Aedes aegypti (IFMA), calculated by epidemiological week and the inspected trap locations (IDs), from December 2010 to April 2013, in the Seropédica municipality, RJ, indicating the transmission risk levels of the disease
Figure 4Scatter plot of the number of females of Aedes aegypti with average environmental temperature and average rainfall, in the 52 weeks of the research period (2010-2013), in the Seropédica municipality, RJ: summer (Jan/Feb/Mar) - weeks 1 to 13, autumn (Apr/May/Jun) - weeks 14 to 26, winter (Jul/Aug/Sep) - weeks 27-39 and spring (Oct/Nov/Dec) - weeks 40-52