Maria Angelica Carrillo1, Axel Kroeger2, Rocio Cardenas Sanchez2, Sonia Diaz Monsalve2, Silvia Runge-Ranzinger3. 1. Centre for Medicine and Society, Master Programme Global Urban Health, Albert-Ludwigs- University Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany. maria.carrillo@zmg.uni-freiburg.de. 2. Centre for Medicine and Society, Master Programme Global Urban Health, Albert-Ludwigs- University Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany. 3. Institute of Global Health, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The rapid expansion of dengue, Zika and chikungunya with large scale outbreaks are an increasing public health concern in many countries. Additionally, the recent coronavirus pandemic urged the need to get connected for fast information transfer and exchange. As response, health programmes have -among other interventions- incorporated digital tools such as mobile phones for supporting the control and prevention of infectious diseases. However, little is known about the benefits of mobile phone technology in terms of input, process and outcome dimensions. The purpose of this scoping review is to analyse the evidence of the use of mobile phones as an intervention tool regarding the performance, acceptance, usability, feasibility, cost and effectiveness in dengue, Zika and chikungunya control programmes. METHODS: We conducted a scoping review of studies and reports by systematically searching: i) electronic databases (PubMed, PLOS ONE, PLOS Neglected Tropical Disease, LILACS, WHOLIS, ScienceDirect and Google scholar), ii) grey literature, using Google web and iii) documents in the list of references of the selected papers. Selected studies were categorized using a pre-determined data extraction form. Finally, a narrative summary of the evidence related to general characteristics of available mobile health tools and outcomes was produced. RESULTS: The systematic literature search identified 1289 records, 32 of which met the inclusion criteria and 4 records from the reference lists. A total of 36 studies were included coming from twenty different countries. Five mobile phone services were identified in this review: mobile applications (n = 18), short message services (n=7), camera phone (n = 6), mobile phone tracking data (n = 4), and simple mobile communication (n = 1). Mobile phones were used for surveillance, prevention, diagnosis, and communication demonstrating good performance, acceptance and usability by users, as well as feasibility of mobile phone under real life conditions and effectiveness in terms of contributing to a reduction of vectors/ disease and improving users-oriented behaviour changes. It can be concluded that there are benefits for using mobile phones in the fight against arboviral diseases as well as other epidemic diseases. Further studies particularly on acceptance, cost and effectiveness at scale are recommended.
BACKGROUND: The rapid expansion of dengue, Zika and chikungunya with large scale outbreaks are an increasing public health concern in many countries. Additionally, the recent coronavirus pandemic urged the need to get connected for fast information transfer and exchange. As response, health programmes have -among other interventions- incorporated digital tools such as mobile phones for supporting the control and prevention of infectious diseases. However, little is known about the benefits of mobile phone technology in terms of input, process and outcome dimensions. The purpose of this scoping review is to analyse the evidence of the use of mobile phones as an intervention tool regarding the performance, acceptance, usability, feasibility, cost and effectiveness in dengue, Zika and chikungunya control programmes. METHODS: We conducted a scoping review of studies and reports by systematically searching: i) electronic databases (PubMed, PLOS ONE, PLOS Neglected Tropical Disease, LILACS, WHOLIS, ScienceDirect and Google scholar), ii) grey literature, using Google web and iii) documents in the list of references of the selected papers. Selected studies were categorized using a pre-determined data extraction form. Finally, a narrative summary of the evidence related to general characteristics of available mobile health tools and outcomes was produced. RESULTS: The systematic literature search identified 1289 records, 32 of which met the inclusion criteria and 4 records from the reference lists. A total of 36 studies were included coming from twenty different countries. Five mobile phone services were identified in this review: mobile applications (n = 18), short message services (n=7), camera phone (n = 6), mobile phone tracking data (n = 4), and simple mobile communication (n = 1). Mobile phones were used for surveillance, prevention, diagnosis, and communication demonstrating good performance, acceptance and usability by users, as well as feasibility of mobile phone under real life conditions and effectiveness in terms of contributing to a reduction of vectors/ disease and improving users-oriented behaviour changes. It can be concluded that there are benefits for using mobile phones in the fight against arboviral diseases as well as other epidemic diseases. Further studies particularly on acceptance, cost and effectiveness at scale are recommended.
Entities:
Keywords:
Chikungunya; Dengue; Mobile phone; Mobile technology; Zika; mHealth
Authors: Helena R C Araújo; Danilo O Carvalho; Rafaella S Ioshino; André L Costa-da-Silva; Margareth L Capurro Journal: Insects Date: 2015-06-11 Impact factor: 2.769
Authors: Kishor Kumar Paul; Parnali Dhar-Chowdhury; C Emdad Haque; Hasan Mohammad Al-Amin; Doli Rani Goswami; Mohammad Abdullah Heel Kafi; Michael A Drebot; L Robbin Lindsay; Gias Uddin Ahsan; W Abdullah Brooks Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-06-21 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: I Made Subrata; Ngakan Putu Anom Harjana; Kadek Karang Agustina; Sang Gede Purnama; Made Pasek Kardiwinata Journal: Vet World Date: 2022-05-21
Authors: Larissa Braz Sousa; Stephen Fricker; Cameron E Webb; Katherine L Baldock; Craig R Williams Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-05-23 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Elisa Ruiz-Burga; Patricia Bruijning-Verhagen; Paulette Palmer; Annalisa Sandcroft; Georgina Fernandes; Marieke de Hoog; Lenroy Bryan; Russell Pierre; Heather Bailey; Carlo Giaquinto; Claire Thorne; Celia D C Christie Journal: JMIR Form Res Date: 2022-07-27