Literature DB >> 28792901

An Automated Classification of Pathological Gait Using Unobtrusive Sensing Technology.

Elham Dolatabadi, Babak Taati, Alex Mihailidis.   

Abstract

This paper integrates an unobtrusive and affordable sensing technology with machine learning methods to discriminate between healthy and pathological gait patterns as a result of stroke or acquired brain injury. A feature analysis is used to identify the role of each body part in separating pathological patterns from healthy patterns. Gait features, including the orientations of the hips and spine (trunk), shoulders and neck (upper limb), knees and ankles (lower limb), are calculated during walking based on Kinect skeletal tracking sequences. Sequences of these features during three types of walking conditions were examined: 1) walking at self-pace (WSP); 2) walking at distracted (WD); and 3) walking at fast pace (WFP). Two machine learning approaches, an instance-based discriminative classifier ( -nearest neighbor) and a dynamical generative classifier (using Gaussian Process Latent Variable Model), are examined to distinguish between healthy and pathological gaits. Nested cross validation is implemented to evaluate the performance of the two classifiers using three metrics: F1-score, macro-averaged error, and micro-averaged error. The discriminative model outperforms the generative model in terms of the F1-score (discriminative: WSP > 0.95, WD > 0.96, and WFP > 0.95 and generative: WSP > 0.87, WD > 0.85, and WFP > 0.68) and macro-averaged error (discriminative: WSP < 0.08, WD < 0.1, and WFP < 0.09 and generative: WSP < 0.11, WD < 0.12, and WFP < 0.14). The dynamical generative model on the other hand obtains better micro-averaged error (discriminative: WSP < 0.37, WD < 0.3, and WFP < 0.35 and generative: WSP < 0.15, WD < 0.2, and WFP < 0.2). The high-dimensional gait features are divided into five subsets: lower limb, upper limb, trunk, velocity, and acceleration. An instance-based feature analysis method (ReliefF) is used to assign weights to each subset of features according to its discriminatory power. The feature analysis establishes the most informative features (upper limb, lower limb, and trunk) for identifying pathological gait.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28792901     DOI: 10.1109/TNSRE.2017.2736939

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng        ISSN: 1534-4320            Impact factor:   3.802


  9 in total

1.  Machine learning algorithms trained with pre-hospital acquired history-taking data can accurately differentiate diagnoses in patients with hip complaints.

Authors:  Michiel Siebelt; Dirk Das; Amber Van Den Moosdijk; Tristan Warren; Peter Van Der Putten; Walter Van Der Weegen
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2021-02-12       Impact factor: 3.717

2.  Automatic Detection of Compensation During Robotic Stroke Rehabilitation Therapy.

Authors:  Ying Xuan Zhi; Michelle Lukasik; Michael H Li; Elham Dolatabadi; Rosalie H Wang; Babak Taati
Journal:  IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 3.316

3.  Gait analysis with the Kinect v2: normative study with healthy individuals and comprehensive study of its sensitivity, validity, and reliability in individuals with stroke.

Authors:  Jorge Latorre; Carolina Colomer; Mariano Alcañiz; Roberto Llorens
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2019-07-26       Impact factor: 4.262

4.  Machine-learning-based children's pathological gait classification with low-cost gait-recognition system.

Authors:  Linghui Xu; Jiansong Chen; Fei Wang; Yuting Chen; Wei Yang; Canjun Yang
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 2.819

Review 5.  Machine Learning in Orthopedics: A Literature Review.

Authors:  Federico Cabitza; Angela Locoro; Giuseppe Banfi
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2018-06-27

6.  The Accuracy of the Microsoft Kinect V2 Sensor for Human Gait Analysis. A Different Approach for Comparison with the Ground Truth.

Authors:  Diego Guffanti; Alberto Brunete; Miguel Hernando; Javier Rueda; Enrique Navarro Cabello
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-08-07       Impact factor: 3.576

7.  Out-of-Distribution Detection of Human Activity Recognition with Smartwatch Inertial Sensors.

Authors:  Philip Boyer; David Burns; Cari Whyne
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 3.576

8.  Detection and Classification of Stroke Gaits by Deep Neural Networks Employing Inertial Measurement Units.

Authors:  Fu-Cheng Wang; Szu-Fu Chen; Chin-Hsien Lin; Chih-Jen Shih; Ang-Chieh Lin; Wei Yuan; You-Chi Li; Tien-Yun Kuo
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-07       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 9.  A Survey of Human Gait-Based Artificial Intelligence Applications.

Authors:  Elsa J Harris; I-Hung Khoo; Emel Demircan
Journal:  Front Robot AI       Date:  2022-01-03
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.