| Literature DB >> 28792520 |
Lina Long1, Jiashun Chen2, Yonggang Zhang3, Xiao Liang4, Hengjia Ni2, Bin Zhang1, Yulong Yin1,2.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to compare the effect of dietary supplementation with low dose of porous and nano zinc oxide (ZnO) on weaning piglets, and to evaluate the possibility of using them as an alternative to high dose of regular ZnO. Piglets were randomly allocated into four treatment groups fed with four diets: (1) basal diet (NC), (2) NC+ 3000 mg/kg ZnO (PC), (3) NC + 500 mg/kg porous ZnO (HiZ) and (4) NC + 500 mg/kg nano ZnO (ZNP). The result showed that piglets in HiZ group had less diarrhea than ZNP group (P < 0.05). Besides, there was no significant difference between PC, HiZ and ZNP groups in terms of serum malondialdeyhde (MDA) concentration and glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px) activity (P > 0.05). Analysis of trace metal elements revealed that piglets fed with high dose of regular ZnO had the highest Zn level in kidney (P < 0.05), which may induce kidney stone formation. Additionally, a decrease in ileal crypt depth was observed in PC, HiZ and ZNP group, suggesting an effective protection against intestinal injury. Results of mRNA analysis in intestine showed that ZNP supplementation had better effects on up-regulated trefoil factor 3 (TFF3) and nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) levels in duodenum and jejunum than HiZ did (P < 0.05), implying that nano ZnO may possess higher anti-inflammatory capacity than porous ZnO. In conclusion, dietary supplementation with low dose of porous and nano ZnO had similar (even better) effect on improving growth performance and intestinal morphology, reducing diarrhea and intestinal inflammatory as high dose of regular ZnO in weaning piglets. Compared with nano ZnO, porous ZnO had better performance on reducing diarrhea but less effect on up-regulation of intestinal TFF3 and Nrf2.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28792520 PMCID: PMC5549748 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182550
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Composition of basal diet (as-fed basis).
| Ingredient | Content, % | Nutrient level | Content, % |
|---|---|---|---|
| Corn | 58.00 | DE (MJ/kg) | 14.01 |
| Soybean meal | 17.00 | CP | 22.84 |
| Extruded soybean | 7.00 | Ca | 0.86 |
| Fish meal | 4.50 | TP | 0.75 |
| Whey powder | 4.50 | Lys | 1.13 |
| Wheat bran | 5.00 | ||
| Dicalcium phosphate | 1.50 | ||
| Salt | 0.25 | ||
| Limestone | 1.10 | ||
| Lys | 0.15 | ||
| Premix | 1 | ||
| Total | 100 |
1The dietary treatments were: negative control (NC), basal diet; positive control (PC), basal diet + 3000ppm ZnO; low HiZox (LHZ), basal diet + 200 ppm HiZox; high HiZox (HHZ), basal diet + 500 ppm HiZox; ZnO nanoparticles (ZNP), basal diet + 500 ppm ZnO nanoparticles
2Premix supplied per kilogram of diet: VA1, 500 IU; VD3, 200 IU; VE, 10 IU; VK3, 0.5 mg; VB2, 3.6 mg; VB1, 1.0 mg; VB6, 1.5 mg; biotin, 0.05 mg; folic acid, 0.3 mg; d-pantothen, 10 mg; nicotinic acid, 10 mg; choline, 500 mg.
The primer sequences used in this study.
| Gene | Primer squence (5’-3’) | Size (bp) | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| IL-1 | F: | 196 | [ |
| IL-6 | F: | 253 | [ |
| TNF-α | F: | 199 | [ |
| IFN-γ | F: | 140 | [ |
| TFF3 | F: | 80 | [ |
| Nrf2 | F: | 190 | [ |
| β-actin | F: | 158 | [ |
1 IL-1, interleukin 1; IL-6, interleukin 6; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor α; IFN-γ, interferon γ; TFF3, trefoil factor 3; Nrf2, nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2.
Growth performance and the incidence rate of diarrhea.
| Item | NC | PC | HiZ | ZNP |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ADG (g/d) | 329.91±23.34 | 420.09±7.57 | 367.41±13.38 | 377.04±12.09 |
| ADFI (g/d) | 601.82±11.17 | 699.93±23.89 | 651.61±9.59 | 675.77±5.57 |
| F/G | 1.91±0.08 | 1.69±0.03 | 1.80±0.05 | 1.87±0.02 |
| Diarrhea incidence | 9.15±0.08 | 4.91±0.10 | 5.13±0.07 | 5.51±0.10 |
1ADFI, average daily feed intake; ADG, average daily gain; F/G, feed/gain ratio. Data were shown as the mean ± SEM, n = 8.
abc Mean values within different letters were significantly different (P<0.05).
Concentrations of trace metal elements in muscle and kidney.
| Organ | Metal | NC | PC | HiZ | ZNP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Muscle (μg/g) | Cr | 0.13±0.01 | 0.11±0.00 | 0.11±0.01 | 0.13±0.02 |
| Mn | 0.08±0.01 | 0.06±0.00 | 0.06±0.00 | 0.07±0.01 | |
| Cu | 0.31±0.01 | 0.27±0.02 | 0.29±0.01 | 0.29±0.02 | |
| Zn | 1.5±0.06 | 1.51±0.05 | 1.38±0.13 | 1.39±0.09 | |
| Fe | 1.62±0.08 | 1.18±0.04 | 1.23±0.10 | 1.33±0.12 | |
| Ca | 22.59±1.9 | 23.9±0.5 | 21.53±1.6 | 22.82±0.10 | |
| Mg | 24.67±0.59 | 24.58±0.87 | 21.76±2.00 | 23.5±0.10 | |
| Kidney (μg/g) | Cr | 0.09±0.01 | 0.09±0.00 | 0.1±0.01 | 0.1±0.01 |
| Mn | 0.29±0.02 | 0.26±0.01 | 0.28±0.01 | 0.27±0.01 | |
| Cu | 4.82±0.46 | 6.12±0.53 | 4.92±0.76 | 4.65±0.48 | |
| Zn | 8.17±1.06 | 20.23±1.38 | 5.85±0.42 | 6.71±0.62 | |
| Fe | 0.29±0.02 | 0.26±0.01 | 0.28±0.01 | 0.27±0.01 | |
| Ca | 21.84±0.61 | 25.54±2.48 | 19.69±1.07 | 21.32±2.09 | |
| Mg | 16.55±0.68 | 18.21±0.22 | 16.58±0.45 | 16.24±0.56 |
1 Data were shown as the mean ± SEM, n = 8
ab Mean values within different letters were significantly different (P<0.05).
Fig 1Activities of diamine oxidase (DAO) (A) and glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px) (B), serum malondialdeyhde (MDA) concentration (C) in four groups.
Data were shown as the mean ± SEM, n = 8. a,bMean values within different letters were significantly different (P<0.05).
Effect of different sources of ZnO on intestinal morphology of weanling pigs.
| Item (μm) | NC | PC | HiZ | ZNP | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Duodenum | Villus height | 386.60±8.73 | 408.32±5.95 | 376.73±2.42 | 373.63±9.15 |
| Crypt depth | 154.49±10.60 | 156.30±6.45 | 153.68±8.46 | 151.05±10.47 | |
| V/C | 2.50±0.18 | 2.61±0.15 | 2.49±0.14 | 2.41±0.15 | |
| Jejunum | Villus height | 334.73±11.27 | 360.58±13.66 | 355.79±26.18 | 352.89±13.81 |
| Crypt depth | 133.79±6.93 | 156.7±3.91 | 150.03±5.08 | 133.79±7.95 | |
| V/C | 2.46±0.15 | 2.48±0.07 | 2.42±0.15 | 2.68±0.14 | |
| Ileum | Villus height | 320.40±15.01 | 305.40±20.21 | 321.03±16.78 | 322.45±14.86 |
| Crypt depth | 141.51±6.14 | 120.47±1.66 | 126.96±5.43 | 119.73±4.07 | |
| V/C | 2.30±0.11 | 2.59±0.16 | 2.43±0.13 | 2.50±0.20 |
1 Data were shown as the mean ± SEM, n = 8
2 V/C = Villus height/ Crypt depth
a,b Mean values within different letters were significantly different (P<0.05).
Fig 2Intestinal relative mRNA levels of inflammatory cytokines.
IL-1, interleukin 1; IL-6, interleukin 6; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor α; IFN-γ, interferon γ; TFF3, trefoil factor 3; Nrf2, nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2. Data were shown as the mean ± SEM, n = 8. a,bMean values within different letters were significantly different (P<0.05).