Literature DB >> 28791801

One-piece internal zirconia abutments for single-tooth restorations on narrow and regular diameter implants: A 5-year prospective follow-up study.

Andrée Nilsson1, Lars-Åke Johansson1,2, Christina Lindh3, Anders Ekfeldt4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Studies have reported an increased risk for fractures of zirconia abutments compared with titanium abutments.
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate single-tooth implant restorations with one-piece yttria-stabilized internal zirconia abutments on narrow and regular diameter implants up to 6 years after insertion.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: This study comprises 52 consecutively treated patients, with a median age of 19 years. In total, 59 narrow (3.3 mm) and 10 regular (4.1 mm) diameter implants were installed. Sixty-five all-ceramic crowns were cemented on implant-supported one-piece internal zirconia abutments and 4 restorations were screw-retained.
RESULTS: Thirty-five patients with 48 implant restorations participated in the final examination and another 14 patients with 16 implant restorations were possible to reach and could be interviewed. The implant survival was 100% but the survival rate for the implant-supported ceramic restorations was lower, 87.5%. Three crowns (4.7%) were remade for different reasons. Five restorations (7.8%) were remade due to fracture of the internal one-piece zirconia abutment. Four of these fractures occurred in 3.3 mm implant abutments.
CONCLUSIONS: Narrow diameter implants offer an opportunity to restore small single-tooth edentulous gaps. For esthetical reasons the choice of an abutment in zirconia can be favorable, but at least with the used implant system, there seems to be an increased risk for fracture. Most patients were very satisfied with the esthetics and function of their implant restorations.
© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  abutments; bone loss; clinical study; complications; implant survival; prospective; zirconia

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28791801     DOI: 10.1111/cid.12515

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res        ISSN: 1523-0899            Impact factor:   3.932


  4 in total

1.  All-ceramic versus titanium-based implant supported restorations: Preliminary 12-months results from a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Paul Weigl; Georgia Trimpou; Eleftherios Grizas; Pablo Hess; Georg-Hubertus Nentwig; Hans-Christoph Lauer; Jonas Lorenz
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 1.904

2.  Fracture Resistance of Zirconia Abutments with or without a Titanium Base: An In Vitro Study for Tapered Conical Connection Implants.

Authors:  Shota Watanabe; Tamaki Nakano; Shinji Ono; Yasufumi Yamanishi; Takashi Matsuoka; Shoichi Ishigaki
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-05       Impact factor: 3.623

Review 3.  A systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the survival, the failure, and the complication rates of veneered and monolithic all-ceramic implant-supported single crowns.

Authors:  Bjarni Elvar Pjetursson; Irena Sailer; Andrey Latyshev; Kerstin Rabel; Ralf-Joachim Kohal; Duygu Karasan
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 5.021

4.  Cemented versus screw-retained zirconia-based single-implant restorations: 5-year results of a randomized controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Sofia T Lamperti; Karin Wolleb; Christoph H F Hämmerle; Ronald E Jung; Jürg Hüsler; Daniel S Thoma
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 5.021

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.