Literature DB >> 28791294

The Use of Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Assessing the Insertion of Bone Conduction Hearing Implants.

Tim George Ate Calon1, Martin Lars Johansson2,3, Elske Larissa van den Burg1, Anna Maria Louisa Janssen4, Marc van Hoof1, Robert Jan Stokroos1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare postoperative cone beam CT (CBCT) imaging to implant stability quotient (ISQ) measurement and direct caliper measurements as a suitable technique to assess bone conduction hearing implant (BCHI) seating and insertion depth.
METHODS: In vitro, BCHIs were completely (n = 9) and partially inserted (n = 9) in bone blocks of different densities and subsequently scanned. Scans were processed using 3DSlicer 4.3.1 and Mathematica 10.3. ISQ measurements were obtained for all BCHIs mounted with different abutment lengths (9, 12, and 14 mm). CBCT imaging was performed for patients with a clinical indication.
RESULTS: In vitro, 95% prediction intervals for partially inserted and completely inserted BCHIs were determined. ISQ values significantly decreased with partial insertion, low-density artificial bone, and longer abutment lengths. Evaluation of in vitro and in vivo 3D models allowed for assessment of insertion depth and inclination.
CONCLUSION: CBCT imaging allows to study implant seating and insertion depth after BCHI surgery. This can be useful when visual confirmation is limited. It is possible to distinguish a partial BCHI insertion from a complete insertion in artificial bone blocks. This technique could prove to be a valuable research tool. In vitro, ISQ values for Ponto BCHIs relate to abutment length, insertion depth, and artificial bone density.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BAHA; Osstell; bone-anchored hearing implants; implant stability; radiology; resonance frequency analysis

Year:  2017        PMID: 28791294      PMCID: PMC5522863          DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2017.00038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Surg        ISSN: 2296-875X


  18 in total

Review 1.  Application and Interpretation of Resonance Frequency Analysis in Auditory Osseointegrated Implants: A Review of Literature and Establishment of Practical Recommendations.

Authors:  Rik C Nelissen; Stina Wigren; Mark C Flynn; Gert J Meijer; Emmanuel A M Mylanus; Myrthe K S Hol
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.311

2.  Punch and Drill: Implantation of Bone Anchored Hearing Device Through a Minimal Skin Punch Incision Versus Implantation With Dermatome and Soft Tissue Reduction.

Authors:  Thibaud Dumon; Marimar Medina; Neil M Sperling
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 1.547

Review 3.  Factors Affecting Dental Implant Stability Measured Using the Ostell Mentor Device: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Francisco J Manzano-Moreno; Francisco J Herrera-Briones; Tala Bassam; Manuel F Vallecillo-Capilla; Candela Reyes-Botella
Journal:  Implant Dent       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.454

4.  Analysis of the accuracy of linear measurements obtained by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT-NewTom).

Authors:  C A Lascala; J Panella; M M Marques
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.419

5.  Comparison of radiation dose for implant imaging using conventional spiral tomography, computed tomography, and cone-beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Anson C M Chau; Karl Fung
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  2009-01-25

6.  Minimally Invasive Surgery for Osseointegrated Auditory Implants: A Comparison of Linear versus Punch Techniques.

Authors:  Steven A Gordon; Daniel H Coelho
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2015-02-24       Impact factor: 3.497

7.  Short-term results from seventy-six patients receiving a bone-anchored hearing implant installed with a novel minimally invasive surgery technique.

Authors:  M L Johansson; R J Stokroos; R Banga; M K Hol; E A Mylanus; H Savage Jones; J R Tysome; P Vannucchi; J R Hof; J W Brunings; J van Tongeren; R W Lutgert; A Banerjee; J P Windfuhr; A Caruso; A L Giannuzzi; S Bordin; J Hanif; N Schart-Morén; S Singam; S Jonhede; M Holmberg; C W Cremers; M Hultcrantz
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 2.597

8.  The punch method for bone-anchored hearing aid placement.

Authors:  Richard Andrew Goldman; Alexandros Georgolios; Wayne Thomas Shaia
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 3.497

9.  Controlled Clinical Trial on Bone-anchored Hearing Implants and a Surgical Technique With Soft-tissue Preservation.

Authors:  Christine A den Besten; Arjan J Bosman; Rik C Nelissen; Emmanuel A M Mylanus; Myrthe K S Hol
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 2.311

10.  A Proposed Method for Accurate 3D Analysis of Cochlear Implant Migration Using Fusion of Cone Beam CT.

Authors:  Guido Dees; Marc van Hoof; Robert Stokroos
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2016-01-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.