| Literature DB >> 28791149 |
Eric J Pedersen1,2, Patrick L Thompson1, R Aaron Ball1, Marie-Josée Fortin3, Tarik C Gouhier4, Heike Link1,5, Charlotte Moritz6,7, Hedvig Nenzen8, Ryan R E Stanley9, Zofia E Taranu10, Andrew Gonzalez1, Frédéric Guichard1, Pierre Pepin11.
Abstract
The Northwest Atlantic cod stocks collapsed in the early 1990s and have yet to recover, despite the subsequent establishment of a continuing fishing moratorium. Efforts to understand the collapse and lack of recovery have so far focused mainly on the dynamics of commercially harvested species. Here, we use data from a 33-year scientific trawl survey to determine to which degree the signatures of the collapse and recovery of the cod are apparent in the spatial and temporal dynamics of the broader groundfish community. Over this 33-year period, the groundfish community experienced four phases of change: (i) a period of rapid, synchronous biomass collapse in most species, (ii) followed by a regime shift in community composition with a concomitant loss of functional diversity, (iii) followed in turn by periods of slow compositional recovery, and (iv) slow biomass growth. Our results demonstrate how a community-wide perspective can reveal new aspects of the dynamics of collapse and recovery unavailable from the analysis of individual species or a combination of a small number of species. Overall, we found evidence that such community-level signals should be useful for designing more effective management strategies to ensure the persistence of exploited marine ecosystems.Entities:
Keywords: community ecology; community synchrony; ecosystem-based management; marine ecology; regime shifts; spatial ecology
Year: 2017 PMID: 28791149 PMCID: PMC5541544 DOI: 10.1098/rsos.170215
Source DB: PubMed Journal: R Soc Open Sci ISSN: 2054-5703 Impact factor: 2.963
Figure 1.Trends in biomass and community synchrony. (a) Trends in mean population biomass of different community subsets: the total community (solid line) and the community excluding the commercially important species (dotted line). Vertical bars represent ±1 Jackknife standard errors (n = 421 (s.d. = 62) per year). The inset shows biomass dynamics of the non-commercial species alone, to show the scale of decline in this community. (b) Biomass trends for the four most abundant, commercially important species in the community. (c) Interspecific synchrony of community subsets. Full (empty) points denote statistically (in)significant community-wide synchrony in that community subset. Line colour denotes the direction of population change in that period: blue (red) denotes declining (increasing) biomasses in that community subset. Important transitions marked by vertical lines: 1990 is considered the start of the cod collapse, and the gear change occurred in 1995.
Figure 2.Trends in exogenous ecosystem drivers. (a) Time series of fishing effort focused on benthic fish, measured in megatonne-days. (b) Time series of the Newfoundland aggregated climatic index. The index is scaled so that negative values correspond to colder conditions.
Figure 3.Changes in community composition across the study period. (a,b) Shifts in community composition illustrated by two-dimensional NMDS using the Bray–Curtis dissimilarity: (a) all species (b) non-commercial species. Colours denote key periods: blue are years prior to collapse, yellow are years following the collapse and light green are post-gear change years. (c) Shifts over time in the fraction of total community biomass held in the four most abundant species. Colours denote the four most abundant, commercially important species and white area denotes the remaining 26 non-commercial species. Vertical dashed lines are as in figure 1.
Figure 4.Time series of the biomass-weighted functional dispersion (FDis) of the regional groundfish community. FDis for all species (solid line) and the non-commercial species (dotted line) are shown. ±1 Jackknife standard errors (n = 421 (s.d. = 62) per year) are too small to be visible. Vertical lines are as in figure 1.
Figure 5.Change in spatial arrangement of the groundfish community over time. (a) Changes in spatial distribution of community clusters. Grey polygons did not have surveys in that period. (b) Mean depth of each polygon. (c) Mean fractions of the top four species in each of the seven clusters in (a). Area of each bar represents the fraction of that species averaged across all polygon-years for that cluster.
Figure 6.Changes over time in variance of community composition explained by (a) geographical distance and (b) differences in depth between sites. Lines indicate estimated value, with vertical bars indicating ±1 Jackknife standard error (n = 421 (s.d. = 62) per year). Separate trends are plotted for all species (solid line) and the non-commercial species (dashed line).
Figure 7.Relative change of different community metrics over time. Each line has been scaled between 0 and 100, where 100 is equal to the reference value in 1981. Black: mean per-trawl biomass; light blue: mean per-trawl cod biomass; green: community composition, measured as the Bray–Curtis dissimilarity of the community in a given year from the community in 1981; red: functional dispersion. Vertical lines are as in figure 1.