Literature DB >> 28790640

MIDAZOLAM, A NEW MORE POTENT BENZODIAZEPINE, COMPARED WITH DIAZEPAM AS SEDATIVE DURING SPINAL ANALGESIA, A RANDOMISED DOUBLE BLIND STUDY.

Yudhvir Suri1, N S Lamba2.   

Abstract

Midazolam, a new benzodiazepine was compared with diazepam as intraoperative sedative during spinal anaesthesia in a double blind study. Eighty five patients participated in this clinical trial (placebo 25, midazolam 30, diazepam 30). Drug treatment was administered after spinal anaesthesia at 5 min of supine position. Level of spinal anaesthesia in terms of sympathetic blocade was similar in all the patients. Dosage of drug were tailored to the needs of each patient till the end point of undisturbed sleep. Intraoperative sedation based on predetermined criteria, recovery by Trieger's test at 4 hr after the drug administration, antegrade amnesia by memory card and haemodynamics were assessed. Mean doses of 240 μg kg-1 and 500 μg kg-1 of midazolam and diazepam were required to induce sleep which suggest an equivalent dose ratio of midazolam: diazepam as 1: 2.1. Both the drugs produced effective sedation during spinal anaesthesia, 86.6% patient with midazolam and 93.3% patients with diazepam had deep undisturbed sleep. Clinical recovery was fast in midazolam administered patients but did not meet the criteria of early discharge by Trieger's test at 4 hr after the administration of the drug. There were no gross changes in the circulatory effects of the two drugs. Decrease in mean systolic pressure (<10%) and marginal increase in heart rate was seen. The frequency of antegrade amnesia was greater with midazolam. Global assessment as judged by anaesthesiologist and patients satisfaction for anaesthesia and recovery was higher (93.3%) with midazolam as compared to (79.9%) diazepam.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Benzodiazepine drugs; Intraoperative sedation; Midazolam; Spinal anaesthesia

Year:  2017        PMID: 28790640      PMCID: PMC5531952          DOI: 10.1016/S0377-1237(17)30086-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India        ISSN: 0377-1237


  8 in total

1.  Delayed recovery from a sedative: correlation of the plasma levels of diazepam with clinical effects after oral and intravenous administration.

Authors:  E S Baird; D M Hailey
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1972-08       Impact factor: 9.166

2.  Measuring recovery from anesthesia--a simple test.

Authors:  M G Newman; N Trieger; J C Miller
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1969 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.108

3.  Relationship between plasma concentration and effect of midazolam after oral and intravenous administration.

Authors:  C Crevoisier; W H Ziegler; M Eckert; P Heizmann
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 4.335

4.  Comparison of midazolam and diazepam in doses of comparable potency during gastroscopy.

Authors:  J G Whitwam; D Al-Khudhairi; R F McCloy
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 9.166

5.  Haemodynamic effects of midazolam and thiopentone during induction of anaesthesia for coronary artery surgery.

Authors:  D Al-Khudhairi; J G Whitwam; M K Chakrabarti; H Askitopoulou; E M Grundy; S Powrie
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1982-08       Impact factor: 9.166

6.  Comparison of two benzodiazepines for anaesthesia induction: midazolam and diazepam.

Authors:  J G Reves; G Corssen; C Holcomb
Journal:  Can Anaesth Soc J       Date:  1978-05

7.  A randomized comparison of midazolam and diazepam for sedation in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Authors:  V C Magni; R A Frost; J W Leung; P B Cotton
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 9.166

Review 8.  Midazolam. A review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic use.

Authors:  J W Dundee; N J Halliday; K W Harper; R N Brogden
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 9.546

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.