Literature DB >> 28790396

A novel missense variant in the nuclear localization signal of POU4F3 causes autosomal dominant non-syndromic hearing loss.

Yin-Hung Lin1,2, Yi-Hsin Lin1,3, Ying-Chang Lu1, Tien-Chen Liu1, Chien-Yu Chen4, Chuan-Jen Hsu5,6, Pei-Lung Chen7,8,9,10,11, Chen-Chi Wu12,13.   

Abstract

Autosomal dominant non-syndromic hearing loss (ADNSHL) is genetically heterogeneous with more than 35 genes identified to date. Using a massively parallel sequencing panel targeting 159 deafness genes, we identified a novel missense variant of POU4F3 (c.982A>G, p.Lys328Glu) which co-segregated with the deafness phenotype in a three-generation Taiwanese family with ADNSHL. This variant could be classified as a "pathogenic variant" according to the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics guidelines. We then performed subcellular localization experiments and confirmed that p.Lys328Glu compromised transportation of POU4F3 from the cytoplasm to the nucleus. POU3F4 p.Lys328Glu was located within a bipartite nuclear localization signal (NLS), and was the first missense variant in bipartite NLS of POU4F3 validated in functional studies. These findings expanded the mutation spectrum of POU4F3 and provided insight into the pathogenesis associated with aberrant POU4F3 localization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28790396      PMCID: PMC5548901          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-08236-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


Introduction

Autosomal dominant non-syndromic hearing loss (ADNSHL) is a heterogeneous disease entity with more than 35 genes identified to date (http://hereditaryhearingloss.org/). From an epidemiological perspective, none of these ADNSHL genes is more prevalent than another, making it difficult to perform genetic testing using conventional Sanger sequencing[1]. Recently, massively parallel sequencing (MPS), also known as targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS), has been proven to be a powerful tool in addressing genetically heterogeneous hereditary hearing impairment[2]. By using MPS-based panels, genetic causes could be determined in >50% of cases with ADNSHL[3]. POU4F3 (MIM #602460) is one of the earliest deafness genes identified to cause ADNSHL DFNA15. In 1998, Vahava et al. detected an 8-base pair deletion in POU4F3 in a five-generation Israeli Jewish family[4]. To date, only 12 POU4F3 causative variants have been reported in the literature, that is, six missense variants[5-10], five frameshift deletions[4, 11–14], and a large deletion encompassing the entire gene[15, 16]. POU4F3 is located on 5q31 and encodes a protein of 338 amino acids, which functions as a transcription factor with two DNA-binding domains: the POU-specific domain and the POU homeodomain[17]. Two nuclear localization signals (NLSs) crucial for active protein transport into the nucleus are located within the POU homeodomain. The first is a monopartite NLS located at amino acids 274 to 278, and the second is a bipartite NLS located at amino acids 314 to 331[18]. According to previous reports, mutations in POU4F3 might lead to late-onset bilateral progressive hearing loss with down-sloping audiometric configurations[8].

Results

Clinical features

The proband of the family was a 45-year-old woman who had bilateral progressive hearing impairment since around 30 years of age. Audiogram of the better ear of the proband showed the following hearing acuity: 40 dB at 250 Hz, 80 dB at 500 Hz, 90 dB at 1000 Hz, 115 dB at 2000 Hz, 120 dB at 4000 Hz, and 110 dB at 8000 Hz. Audiometry showed a down-sloping configuration (Fig. 1b). Her grandfather, her mother, and her mother’s two half-sisters (with the same father) also presented with late onset progressive hearing impairment (Fig. 1a).
Figure 1

(a) The pedigree and segregation pattern of the family, which harbored POU4F3 p.Lys328Glu. (b) The audiogram of both ears in the proband of the family revealed profound hearing loss with down-sloping shape. Hearing levels of the right and the left ear are marked using red and blue lines, respectively. (c) MPS-based panel identified a POU4F3 c.982A>G, p.Lys328Glu variant in the proband and this variant was validated by Sanger sequencing.

(a) The pedigree and segregation pattern of the family, which harbored POU4F3 p.Lys328Glu. (b) The audiogram of both ears in the proband of the family revealed profound hearing loss with down-sloping shape. Hearing levels of the right and the left ear are marked using red and blue lines, respectively. (c) MPS-based panel identified a POU4F3 c.982A>G, p.Lys328Glu variant in the proband and this variant was validated by Sanger sequencing.

Identification of the causative variant

Using MPS-based panel, the average depth of coverage reached 134 folds, with 99.7% of sequences having coverage greater than one fold, 90.2% greater than 30 folds, and 63.8% greater than 100 folds. There were 333 variants located within exons or splice sites of the targeted 159 genes, nearly half of them were synonymous (166 out of 333). After excluding synonymous variants, there were nine variants, including seven nonsynonymous variants and two non-frameshift deletions, with allele frequencies less than 0.5% in the NHLBI-ESP 6500 exome project, 1000 Genomes project, and the East Asian population of the ExAC project (Supplementary Table S1). Prediction of pathogenicity using seven algorithms concluded that POU4F3 p.Lys328Glu (c.982A>G) was the only candidate variant that matched the inheritance pattern. The c.982A>G is in exon 2 of POU4F3 (NM_002700.2). We performed Sanger sequencing (Fig. 1c) and found POU4F3 c.982A>G co-segregated with the deafness phenotype in the family (Fig. 1a). POU4F3 c.982A>G was absent in the NHLBI-ESP 6500 exome project, 1000 Genomes project, ExAC project, 100 normal-hearing Han Chinese controls, and Taiwan Biobank database. All seven of the algorithms reported deleterious effects of the POU4F3 p.Lys328Glu.

Effect of p.Lys328Glu on subcellular localization of POU4F3

The p.Lys328Glu is located within the bipartite NLS of the conserved POU homeodomain (Fig. 2a), suggesting the variant might affect the subcellular localization of POU4F3[18]. To confirm this, we expressed the wild-type or mutant POU4F3 in COS-7 cells. As shown in Fig. 3, whereas the wild-type POU4F3 was located almost exclusively in the nucleus, a portion of the mutant POU4F3 was retained in the cytoplasm, indicating the localization ability of the mutant protein was compromised. Quantification of the transfected cells revealed that the percentage of cells with mutant POU4F3 in the cytoplasm (88%) was much higher than that of cells with the wild-type protein in the cytoplasm (19%).
Figure 2

(a) The POU4F3 p.Lys328 indicated in red shading was located within the bipartite nuclear localization signal (NLS) in the POU homeodomain. The bipartite NLS was conserved across nine species. (b) The location of six reported POU4F3 missense variants and p.Lsy328Glu. POU-specific domain and POU homeodomain are indicated by black boxes. Two NLSs were indicated by red lines. (c) The predicted protein products of five reported POU4F3 frameshift variants. Boxes with slash indicate the new amino acid sequences after the frameshift.

Figure 3

The POU4F3 c.982A>G mutation altered the subcellular localization of transcription factor POU4F3. Nuclei stained with DAPI (blue) and POU4F3 detected by Anti-DYKDDDDK-Tag antibody (red) were visualized by confocal microscopy. The white arrows indicate POU4F3 outside the nuclei.

(a) The POU4F3 p.Lys328 indicated in red shading was located within the bipartite nuclear localization signal (NLS) in the POU homeodomain. The bipartite NLS was conserved across nine species. (b) The location of six reported POU4F3 missense variants and p.Lsy328Glu. POU-specific domain and POU homeodomain are indicated by black boxes. Two NLSs were indicated by red lines. (c) The predicted protein products of five reported POU4F3 frameshift variants. Boxes with slash indicate the new amino acid sequences after the frameshift. The POU4F3 c.982A>G mutation altered the subcellular localization of transcription factor POU4F3. Nuclei stained with DAPI (blue) and POU4F3 detected by Anti-DYKDDDDK-Tag antibody (red) were visualized by confocal microscopy. The white arrows indicate POU4F3 outside the nuclei.

Pathogenicity of POU4F3 p.Lys328Glu

When classified according to the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) guidelines[19], POU4F3 p.Lys328Glu was predicted as deleterious by multiple in silico algorithms, meeting the PP3 category; it co-segregated with deafness in the family, fulfilling the PP1 category; it was absent from controls in multiple population databases and located in a critical functional domain, thus fitting the PM2 and PM1 categories, respectively; and most importantly, our in vitro functional studies demonstrated that this variant compromised protein function, fulfilling the PS3 category. In summary, POU4F3 p.Lys328Glu met five criteria, namely, PS3, PM1, PM2, PP1, and PP3, and could be classified as a “pathogenic variant” according to the ACMG guidelines.

Prevalence of POU4F3 variants in hearing-impaired families

To determine whether POU4F3 variants cause deafness in other Taiwanese families, we sequenced both exons of POU4F3 in 13 additional unrelated families with ADNSHL by either Sanger sequencing or the MPS panel. None of these families harbored causative variants in POU4F3. Similarly, we did not identify any causative variants of POU4F3 in additional 210 hearing-impaired families, which have been subjected to our MPS-based panel for genetic testing, that is, 30 autosomal recessive, four X-linked, and 176 sporadic families. In another paper describing the MPS results of 1119 patients with hearing loss, POU4F3 was not included in the 49 genes in which pathogenic variants were detected[3]. In other words, variants in POU4F3 are a rare cause of deafness from an epidemiological perspective.

Discussion

In this study, we identified a novel missense variant POU4F3 p.Lys328Glu causing ADNSHL in a Taiwanese family. Functional experiments was performed to evaluate the pathogenesis of the mutant protein, and the mislocalization of the protein was detected. Among the 13 POU4F3 causative variants documented in the literature, POU4F3 p.Lys328Glu was the second missense mutation identified within the bipartite NLS (amino acids 314–331) of the POU homeodomain (Fig. 2b,c). Prior to this study, Kim et al. reported p.Arg326Lys in a Korean family with late-onset ADNSHL, but no functional studies were performed to examine the effect of p.Arg326Lys on the subcellular localization of POU4F3[8]. Previous in vitro experiments have demonstrated defected nuclear localization of POU4F3 if variants result in a truncated protein lacking the bipartite NLS alone[18] or both mono- and bipartite NLSs[11]. Our findings further add that missense variants involving key amino acid residues within NLSs might also affect POU4F3 protein trafficking. Monopartite NLSs contain one cluster of basic amino acids, whereas bipartite NLSs are composed of two clusters of basic amino acids separated by a linker[20]. POU4F3 contains both mono- and bipartite NLSs: the sequence of the monopartite NLS is RKRKR, and the sequence of the bipartite NLS is KKNVVRVWFCNLQRQKQKR[18]. Weiss et al. demonstrated that the first two (KK) and last two (KR) amino acids of bipartite NLS were crucial for the nuclear localization of POU4F3. The causative missense variant p.Lys328Glu identified in this study corresponded to the fourth last amino acid of the bipartite NLS. It is conceivable that the replacement of a basic lysine with an acidic glutamate significantly changes the molecular characteristics of the bipartite NLS, indicating that correct alignment of the basic amino acids clusters within NLSs is essential for protein localization. In addition to mislocalization, mutations in POU4F3 might also affect protein stability. Weiss et al. revealed that POU4F3 is a very short-lived protein and the half-life of the mutant protein (p.Ile295Thrfs*5) is longer than that of the wild-type protein[18]. Another study by Collin et al. examined the stability of two mutant POU4F3 proteins with missense variants, p.L223P and p.L289F. The stability of these mutant proteins was not different from that of the wild-type protein[5]. Recent studies have demonstrated a novel function of NLS in regulating protein stability through ubiquitin/proteasome system[21, 22]. Deletion of NLS containing lysine ubiquitination sites could decrease protein degradation[21]. The p.Ile295Thrfs*5 mutation disrupted the bipartite NLS of POU4F3, whereas p.L223P and p.L289F did not. This may explain the extended half-life of POU4F3 with the p.Ile295Thrfs*5 mutation. The p.Lys328Glu mutation identified in this study may also affect POU4F3 degradation, because of the substitution of a lysine residue for a glutamic acid residue within the NLS. Further studies are needed to elucidate the effects of different mutations on the stability of POU4F3. The pathogenetic mechanisms underlying hearing impairment of patients with POU3F4 variants remain unclear. The molecular mechanisms of dominant inheritance includes haploinsufficiency, gain of function and dominant-negative effect[23]. As a dominant-negative effect has been ruled out, haploinsufficiency is the most likely mechanism so far[5, 18]. Although heterozygous Pou4f3 knockout mice exhibited normal hearing comparable to wild-type mice[24], the mechanism of haploinsufficiency has been supported by two different studies. Deletion of the entire POU4F3 has been reported in a Brazilian family with ADNSHL[15]. A Japanese study also identified a POU4F3 frameshift variant (c.1007del), which would produce a transcript without in-frame stop codon (p. Ala336Valfs*? in Fig. 2c)[12], and presumably the nonstop mRNAs might be degraded through non-stop decay[25]. In other words, both variants caused the loss of one copy of POU4F3, indicating the mechanism of haploinsufficiency. The subcellular protein mislocalization shown in this study and others[5, 11, 18] also supports the mechanism of haploinsufficiency. In conclusion, by using an MPS-based genetic testing panel targeting 159 known deafness genes, we identified a novel POU4F3 pathogenic variant, p.Lys328Glu, in a Taiwanese family with ADNSHL. POU4F3 p.Lys328Glu interrupted the bipartite NLS and prevented the transportation of POU4F3 from the cytoplasm to the nucleus. These findings expanded the mutation spectrum of the rare deafness gene POU4F3, and provided insights into the pathogenetic mechanisms associated with aberrant POU4F3 localization.

Methods

Subjects and clinical evaluation

A three-generation deafness family with five affected members was recruited in the study (Fig. 1a). Comprehensive family history; previous medical records; and results of physical, neurological, audiological examinations were obtained and analyzed. Audiological results were characterized with respect to two parameters, namely, hearing levels and audiogram shapes[26]. Hearing level of the better ear, which was calculated using a 4-tone average (0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz), was labeled as mild (20–40 dBHL), moderate (41–70 dBHL), severe (71–95 dBHL), or profound ( > 95 dBHL) hearing loss (GENDEAF: http://audiology.unife.it/www.gendeaf.org/index.html). Informed consent was obtained from all participants and all the procedures used in the study were approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the National Taiwan University Hospital. All methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations.

Targeted MPS-based deafness panel

Genomic DNA of the proband was extracted from peripheral blood and subjected to an MPS-based deafness panel targeting 159 known deafness genes. The sequencing methods and analysis pipelines have been previously reported[27, 28]. In brief, genomic DNA was fragmented into 800 bps. After sample preparation, DNA fragments were enriched using custom probes designed to capture 1,299,144 base pairs with target regions encompassing 3,647 coding and non-coding exons of 159 deafness genes. Paired-end sequencing was performed by the Illumina Miseq platform (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA), which produced 300 bps reads.

Data analysis and filtering

We used BWA-MEM, Picard, GATK, and ANNOVAR to perform reads mapping, converting, sorting, variants calling, and annotation. Data filtering was conducted by an in-house perl script with the following steps: selection of variants located in the targeted 159 genes; filtering out of variants with allele frequencies more than 0.5% in the NHLBI-ESP 6500 exome project (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS/), 1000 Genomes project (http://www.1000genomes.org/), Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC) projects (http://exac.broadinstitute.org/), 100 normal-hearing Han Chinese subjects, and Taiwan Biobank database (https://taiwanview.twbiobank.org.tw/); prediction of the pathogenicity of retained missense variants by seven algorithms including PolyPhen-2, SIFT, LRT, MutationTaster, MutationAssessor, FATHMM, and MetaLR; and confirmation that candidate variants are located in conserved regions of nine species and co-segregate with the deafness phenotype.

Sanger sequencing

Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood or saliva samples of four affected members and two unaffected members. Sanger sequencing was performed to validate the variants identified by the MPS panel and to examine the co-segregation of variants with deafness among the family members. Allele frequencies of variants segregating with the phenotype were also verified in a panel of 100 normal-hearing Han Chinese subjects.

Cell transfection and immunocytochemistry

COS-7 cells were transiently transfected by a lentivirus with constructs encoding either the wild-type or the mutant fusion protein pWPT-POU4F3-6XHis-Flag. Transfected COS-7 cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, permeabilized in 0.5% Triton X-100, and blocked in 10% goat serum. After incubation with DYKDDDDK Tag Antibody (Alexa Fluor 594 Conjugate, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), the samples were examined with a laser scanning confocal microscope (Zeiss LSM 510, Carl Zeiss, Germany). For quantitative analysis, 80-100 cells with mutant or wild-type POU4F3 mislocalization were counted, and the percentage of cells expressing POU4F3 in the cytoplasm was calculated.
  28 in total

Review 1.  Forty-six genes causing nonsyndromic hearing impairment: which ones should be analyzed in DNA diagnostics?

Authors:  Nele Hilgert; Richard J H Smith; Guy Van Camp
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2008-08-29       Impact factor: 2.433

2.  Brn-3.0: a POU-domain protein expressed in the sensory, immune, and endocrine systems that functions on elements distinct from known octamer motifs.

Authors:  M R Gerrero; R J McEvilly; E Turner; C R Lin; S O'Connell; K J Jenne; M V Hobbs; M G Rosenfeld
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1993-11-15       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Dual-utility NLS drives RNF169-dependent DNA damage responses.

Authors:  Liwei An; Yiyang Jiang; Howin H W Ng; Ellen P S Man; Jie Chen; Ui-Soon Khoo; Qingguo Gong; Michael S Y Huen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Mutation in transcription factor POU4F3 associated with inherited progressive hearing loss in humans.

Authors:  O Vahava; R Morell; E D Lynch; S Weiss; M E Kagan; N Ahituv; J E Morrow; M K Lee; A B Skvorak; C C Morton; A Blumenfeld; M Frydman; T B Friedman; M C King; K B Avraham
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-03-20       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Identification of a novel GATA3 mutation in a deaf Taiwanese family by massively parallel sequencing.

Authors:  Yin-Hung Lin; Chen-Chi Wu; Tun-Yen Hsu; Wei-Yih Chiu; Chuan-Jen Hsu; Pei-Lung Chen
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 2.433

6.  Deletion of the entire POU4F3 gene in a familial case of autosomal dominant non-syndromic hearing loss.

Authors:  Érika L Freitas; Jeanne Oiticica; Amanda G Silva; Roseli S M Bittar; Carla Rosenberg; Regina C Mingroni-Netto
Journal:  Eur J Med Genet       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 2.708

7.  Genomic copy number alterations in non-syndromic hearing loss.

Authors:  C Rosenberg; É L Freitas; D T Uehara; M T B M Auricchio; S S Costa; J Oiticica; A G Silva; A C Krepischi; R C Mingroni-Netto
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 4.438

8.  The DFNA15 deafness mutation affects POU4F3 protein stability, localization, and transcriptional activity.

Authors:  Sigal Weiss; Irit Gottfried; Itay Mayrose; Suvarna L Khare; Mengqing Xiang; Sally J Dawson; Karen B Avraham
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.272

9.  Comprehensive genetic testing in the clinical evaluation of 1119 patients with hearing loss.

Authors:  Christina M Sloan-Heggen; Amanda O Bierer; A Eliot Shearer; Diana L Kolbe; Carla J Nishimura; Kathy L Frees; Sean S Ephraim; Seiji B Shibata; Kevin T Booth; Colleen A Campbell; Paul T Ranum; Amy E Weaver; E Ann Black-Ziegelbein; Donghong Wang; Hela Azaiez; Richard J H Smith
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2016-03-11       Impact factor: 4.132

10.  Diverse spectrum of rare deafness genes underlies early-childhood hearing loss in Japanese patients: a cross-sectional, multi-center next-generation sequencing study.

Authors:  Hideki Mutai; Naohiro Suzuki; Atsushi Shimizu; Chiharu Torii; Kazunori Namba; Noriko Morimoto; Jun Kudoh; Kimitaka Kaga; Kenjiro Kosaki; Tatsuo Matsunaga
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 4.123

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Gene therapy development in hearing research in China.

Authors:  Zhen Zhang; Jiping Wang; Chunyan Li; Wenyue Xue; Yazhi Xing; Feng Liu
Journal:  Gene Ther       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 5.250

2.  A New Pathogenic Variant in POU3F4 Causing Deafness Due to an Incomplete Partition of the Cochlea Paved the Way for Innovative Surgery.

Authors:  Ahmet M Tekin; Marco Matulic; Wim Wuyts; Masoud Zoka Assadi; Griet Mertens; Vincent van Rompaey; Yongxin Li; Paul van de Heyning; Vedat Topsakal
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 4.096

3.  A Missense Mutation in POU4F3 Causes Midfrequency Hearing Loss in a Chinese ADNSHL Family.

Authors:  Xue Gao; Jin-Cao Xu; Wei-Qian Wang; Yong-Yi Yuan; Dan Bai; Sha-Sha Huang; Guo-Jian Wang; Yu Su; Jia Li; Dong-Yang Kang; Mei-Guang Zhang; Xi Lin; Pu Dai
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-04-04       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  An integrative approach for pediatric auditory neuropathy spectrum disorders: revisiting etiologies and exploring the prognostic utility of auditory steady-state response.

Authors:  Pei-Hsuan Lin; Chuan-Jen Hsu; Yin-Hung Lin; Yi-Hsin Lin; Shu-Yu Yang; Ting-Hua Yang; Pei-Lung Chen; Chen-Chi Wu; Tien-Chen Liu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Four Novel Variants in POU4F3 Cause Autosomal Dominant Nonsyndromic Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Tian-Yi Cui; Xue Gao; Sha-Sha Huang; Yan-Yan Sun; Si-Qi Zhang; Xin-Xia Jiang; Yan-Zhong Yang; Dong-Yang Kang; Qing-Wen Zhu; Yong-Yi Yuan
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 3.599

6.  Unique spectra of deafness-associated mutations in Mongolians provide insights into the genetic relationships among Eurasian populations.

Authors:  Jargalkhuu Erdenechuluun; Yin-Hung Lin; Khongorzul Ganbat; Delgermaa Bataakhuu; Zaya Makhbal; Cheng-Yu Tsai; Yi-Hsin Lin; Yen-Hui Chan; Chuan-Jen Hsu; Wei-Chung Hsu; Pei-Lung Chen; Chen-Chi Wu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-21       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Comprehensive Etiologic Analyses in Pediatric Cochlear Implantees and the Clinical Implications.

Authors:  Chee-Yee Lee; Pei-Hsuan Lin; Cheng-Yu Tsai; Yu-Ting Chiang; Hong-Ping Chiou; Ko-Yin Chiang; Pei-Lung Chen; Jacob Shu-Jui Hsu; Tien-Chen Liu; Hung-Pin Wu; Chen-Chi Wu; Chuan-Jen Hsu
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2022-07-31

8.  Identification of two novel mutations in POU4F3 gene associated with autosomal dominant hearing loss in Chinese families.

Authors:  Xiaohui Bai; Fengguo Zhang; Yun Xiao; Yu Jin; Qingyin Zheng; Haibo Wang; Lei Xu
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 5.310

9.  Genetic Epidemiology and Clinical Features of Hereditary Hearing Impairment in the Taiwanese Population.

Authors:  Chen-Chi Wu; Cheng-Yu Tsai; Yi-Hsin Lin; Pey-Yu Chen; Pei-Hsuan Lin; Yen-Fu Cheng; Che-Ming Wu; Yin-Hung Lin; Chee-Yee Lee; Jargalkhuu Erdenechuluun; Tien-Chen Liu; Pei-Lung Chen; Chuan-Jen Hsu
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 4.096

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.