Literature DB >> 28789933

Radiation protection in dental radiology - Recent advances and future directions.

V Tsapaki1.   

Abstract

Dental radiology uses X-ray technology to diagnose and design treatment of various clinical problems related to the oral cavity and surrounding tissues. As technology quickly evolves, there are numerous X-ray modalities using different tools in the attempt to best image and treat efficiently these diseases, disorders or other related clinical conditions. The reported numbers of dental X-rays, the fact that these may be under-reported in many countries and because dental X-rays are performed more on younger individuals, whose teeth and dentition are still developing, calls for increased need on radiation protection. The objectives of this paper are to report on the latest technology updates and related radiation protection issues, to present future directions and define gaps. Most of existing radiation protection national and international guidelines are more than a decade old. Update is needed to account for newer technologies such as cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and digital imaging. Diagnostic Reference Levels (DRLs), a well established method for dose optimization, are not yet defined for CBCT and have to be set for various clinical indications. As far as shielding is concerned, recent data confirm that use of lead apron, even in pregnant patients, or gonadal shielding are not recommended, due to negligible radiation dose reduction. Thyroid lead shielding should be used in case the organ is in or close to the primary beam. Specifically for CBCT, leaded glasses, thyroid collars and collimation (smaller field of view (FOV) especially for paediatric patients) minimize the dose to organs outside the FOV.
Copyright © 2017 Associazione Italiana di Fisica Medica. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dental; Optimization; Radiation protection

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28789933     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2017.07.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med        ISSN: 1120-1797            Impact factor:   2.685


  6 in total

1.  A comparative study on image quality of two digital intraoral sensors-methodological, ethical and statistical issues.

Authors:  Fernanda Coelho-Silva; Rocharles Cavalcante Fontenele; Sergio Lins de-Azevedo-Vaz; Deborah Queiroz Freitas
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 2.419

Review 2.  Magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative diagnosis in third molar surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Adib Al-Haj Husain; Bernd Stadlinger; Sebastian Winklhofer; Marco Piccirelli; Silvio Valdec
Journal:  Oral Radiol       Date:  2022-04-09       Impact factor: 1.852

Review 3.  The missing link in image quality assessment in digital dental radiography.

Authors:  Kazutoshi Okamura; Kazunori Yoshiura
Journal:  Oral Radiol       Date:  2019-07-13       Impact factor: 1.852

4.  Evaluating the X-ray-Shielding Performance of Graphene-Oxide-Coated Nanocomposite Fabric.

Authors:  Serhat Süha Türkaslan; Şule Sultan Ugur; Banu Esencan Türkaslan; Nicholas Fantuzzi
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 3.623

5.  Knowledge, attitude, and behavior of Turkish dentists about radiation protection and radiation safety.

Authors:  Ayşegül Yurt; Ceren Ayrancıoğlu; Gülser Kılınç; Esin Ergönül
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2021-07-14       Impact factor: 2.419

6.  A Letter Regarding Recently Published Original Article: Comparative Evaluation of Intraoral and Extraoral Periapical Radiographic Techniques in Determination of Working Length: An In Vivo Study.

Authors:  Johan Km Aps
Journal:  Int J Clin Pediatr Dent       Date:  2020 Sep-Oct
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.