| Literature DB >> 28789691 |
Chiara Valtolina1, Arie B Vaandrager2, Robert P Favier3, Maidina Tuohetahuntila2, Anne Kummeling3, Isabelle Jeusette4, Jan Rothuizen3, Joris H Robben3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A link between lipid metabolism and disease has been recognized in cats. Since hepatic lipidosis is a frequent disorder in cats, the aim of the current study was to evaluate liver and plasma lipid dimorphism in healthy cats and the effects of gonadectomy on lipid profiling. From six female and six male cats plasma and liver lipid profiles before and after spaying/neutering were assessed and compared to five cats (three neutered male and two spayed female) diagnosed with hepatic lipidosis.Entities:
Keywords: Cats; Feline hepatic lipidosis; Lipid dimorphism; Sex hormones; Sphingomyelin
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28789691 PMCID: PMC5549355 DOI: 10.1186/s12917-017-1152-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Vet Res ISSN: 1746-6148 Impact factor: 2.741
Effect of sex hormones and spaying/neutering on liver and plasma lipids of healthy cats (means ± SD)
| Liver | Plasma | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group 1 | Group 2 | Group 3 | Group 4 | Group 1 | Group 2 | Group 3 | Group 4 | |
| Male intact ( | Male neutered ( | Female intact ( | Female spayed ( | Male intact ( | Male neutered ( | Female intact ( | Female spayed ( | |
| Total TAG1 | ||||||||
| (nmol/mg prot) | 51 ± 35 | 58 ± 45 | 99 ± 70 | 78 ± 52 | ||||
| (mmol/l) | 0.22 ± 0.05abc | 0.30 ± 0.10 abc | 0.15 ± 0.03 ac | 0.14 ± 0.05 ac | ||||
| TAG 56:6/72 (%) | 0.6 ± 0.2 | 0.8 ± 0.4 | 0.7 ± 0.1 b | 0.5 ± 0.1b | 0.7 ± 0.3 | 0.8 ± 0.3 | 0.8 ± 0.2 | 0.7 ± 0.2 |
| TAG unsat/sat3 | 1.0 ± 0.3 | 1.1 ± 0.4 | 1.1 ± 0.4 | 0.8 ± 0.3 | 1.8 ± 0.4 | 1.8 ± 0.2 | 2.0 ± 0.6 | 1.8 ± 0.4 |
| Cholesterol (rel. Units) | 13.1 ± 1.7 | 14.2 ± 1.3 | 15.3 ± 1.6 | 13.6 ± 2.0 | 8.9 ± 0.7 | 9.9 ± 1.2 | 9.3 ± 1.1 | 9.0 ± 0.6 |
| Cholesterol ester (rel. Units) | 7.8 ± 2.9 | 7.6 ± 2.6 | 10.3 ± 4.6 | 9.1 ± 3.0 | 61 ± 8 | 62 ± 10 | 56 ± 6 | 59 ± 3 |
| Total PC4 | ||||||||
| (nmol/mg prot) | 24.2 ± 3.8 | 24.1 ± 3.2 | 27.5 ± 3.1 | 24.1 ± 2.3 | ||||
| (mmol/l) | 0.16 ± 0.02 | 0.17 ± 0.03 | 0.15 ± 0.03 | 0.15 ± 0.03 | ||||
| SM5 16:0 (% of PC) | 3.8 ± 0.8 | 3.8 ± 0.5 | 3.4 ± 0.9 | 3.9 ± 0.8 | 7.4 ± 0.7 | 6.9 ± 0.5 | 7.4 ± 0.7 | 7.5 ± 1.1 |
1. TAG = triacylglycerol
2. TAG 56:6/7 = TAG containing relative long unsatured acyl chains
3. TAG unsat/sat = the ratio between TAG with 5 or 6 double bonds versus 2 or 3 double bonds
4. PC = phosphatidylcholine
5. SM = sphingomyelin (SM)
a P < 0.05 male vs female (gender)
b = P < 0.05 intact vs spayed/neutered (time)
c = P < 0.05 interaction between gender and time
Fig. 1Effect of sex (gender), spaying/neutering (time) and their interaction (gender x time) on species distribution of phosphatidylcholine (means ± SD). The major phosphatidylcholine (PC) species were determined in liver biopsies (a) and plasma (b). PC36:4 and PC38:4 contain arachidonic acid (20:4). PC38:6 and PC40:6 contain docosahexaenoic acid (22:6). a = P < 0.05 male vs female (gender), b = P < 0.05 intact vs spayed/neutered (time), c = P < 0.05 interaction between gender and time
Fig. 2Effect of sex and castration on palmitoyl-arachidonoyl-phosphatidylcholine (PC36:4). The phosphatidylcholine (16:0, 20:4) species (PC36:4) were determined in liver biopsies from 6 cats per group. Significant differences were present in liver PC 36:4 between male and female cats (gender) and between male cats pre and post neutering and female cats pre and post spaying. Notice how in the male cats, neutering increases the PC 36:4 liver values. In female cats, spaying decreases the PC 36:4 liver values. # intact cat had low estrogen level
Comparison of liver and plasma lipids between healthy and cats with hepatic lipidosis (HL)
| Liver | Plasma | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cats spayed/neutered | HL cats | Cats spayed/neutered | HL cats | |
| ( | ( | ( | ( | |
| Total TAG1 | ||||
| (nmol/mg prot) | 68 ± 48 | 584 ± 277a | ||
| (mmol/l) | 0.22 ± 0.11 | 0.40 ± 0.25 | ||
| %TAG 56:6/72 | 0.7 ± 0.3 | 1.0 ± 0.3a | 0.8 ± 0.3 | 1.8 ± 1.4 |
| TAG unsat/sat3 | 1.0 ± 0.4 | 1.0 ± 0.7 | 1.8 ± 0.3 | 1.0 ± 0.7 |
| Total PC4 | ||||
| (nmol/mg prot) | 24.1 ± 2.7 | 10.2 ± 5.0 a | ||
| (mmol/l) | 0.16 ± 0.03 | 0.16 ± 0.04 | ||
| % PC4 34:2 | 16.9 ± 2.4 | 20.7 ± 4.0 | 18.3 ± 2.2 | 19.3 ± 1.9 |
| % PC 34:1 | 8.2 ± 1.3 | 12.5 ± 4.3 | 6.4 ± 1.6 | 12.8 ± 7.0 |
| % PC 36:4 | 6.6 ± 0.6 | 5.3 ± 1.5 | 7.1 ± 1.0 | 5.8 ± 2.0 |
| % PC 36:3 | 8.4 ± 1.4 | 6.4 ± 2.5 | 11.0 ± 2.0 | 8.4 ± 2.3a |
| % PC 36:2 | 24.0 ± 2.5 | 24.0 ± 6.2 | 22.6 ± 1.6 | 22.8 ± 3.0 |
| % PC 36:1 | 10.6 ± 1.1 | 11.6 ± 3.6 | 8.4 ± 0.9 | 10.2 ± 2.7 |
| % PC 38:4 | 13.6 ± 1.7 | 8.8 ± 3.9 a | 11.8 ± 2.2 | 10.0 ± 3.2 |
| % PC 38:6 | 3.8 ± 1.1 | 3.7 ± 1.7 | 4.2 ± 1.4 | 4.0 ± 1.5 |
| % PC 40:6 | 4.0 ± 1.6 | 3.7 ± 2.0 | 4.2 ± 1.6 | 3.7 ± 2.0 |
| SM 16:05 (% of PC) | 3.8 ± 0.6 | 8.0 ± 3.5 a | 7.2 ± 0.9 | 14.2 ± 6.4a |
1. TAG = triacylglycerol
2. TAG 56:6/7 = TAG containing relative long unsatured acyl chains
3. TAG unsat/sat = the ratio between TAG with 5 or 6 double bonds versus 2 or 3 double bonds
4. PC = phosphatidylcholine
5. SM = sphingomyelin (SM)
a = P < 0.005 HL vs healthy cats