| Literature DB >> 28788577 |
Hu-Fan Song1, Ai-Zheng Chen2,3,4, Shi-Bin Wang5,6,7, Yong-Qiang Kang8, Shi-Fu Ye9, Yuan-Gang Liu10,11,12, Wen-Guo Wu13,14,15.
Abstract
Using ammonium bicarbonate (AB) particles as a porogen, chitosan (CS)-based hemostatic porous sponges were prepared in supercritical carbon dioxide due to its low viscosity, small surface tension, and good compatibility with organic solvent. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) spectra demonstrated that the chemical compositions of CS and poly-(methyl vinyl ether-co-maleic anhydride) (PVM/MA) were not altered during the phase inversion process. The morphology and structure of the sponge after the supercritical fluid (SCF) process were observed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The resulting hemostatic sponges showed a relatively high porosity (about 80%) with a controllable pore size ranging from 0.1 to 200 µm. The concentration of PVM/MA had no significant influence on the porosity of the sponges. Comparative experiments on biological assessment and hemostatic effect between the resulting sponges and Avitene® were also carried out. With the incorporation of PVM/MA into the CS-based sponges, the water absorption rate of the sponges increased significantly, and the CS-PVM/MA sponges showed a similar water absorption rate (about 90%) to that of Avitene®. The results of the whole blood clotting experiment and animal experiment also demonstrated that the clotting ability of the CS-PVM/MA sponges was similar to that of Avitene®. All these results elementarily verified that the sponges prepared in this study were suitable for hemostasis and demonstrated the feasibility of using SCF-assisted phase inversion technology to produce hemostatic porous sponges.Entities:
Keywords: chitosan; hemostatic sponge; porous structure; supercritical fluids
Year: 2014 PMID: 28788577 PMCID: PMC5453353 DOI: 10.3390/ma7042459
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1.Schematic diagram of the apparatus for the supercritical fluid (SCF) process.
Figure 2.Optical digital photo of the porous sponge.
Figure 3.SEM photos of porous sponges with different mean pore sizes of (a) 0.1 μm; (b) 60 μm; (c) 80 μm; and (d) 200 μm.
Figure 4.FTIR spectra of chitosan (CS) and poly-(methyl vinyl ether-co-maleic anhydride) (PVM/MA) after the SCF process.
Figure 5.(a) Pore volume per gram of plain CS, Avitene®, and CS-PVM/MA sponges; (b) porosity of plain CS, Avitene®, and CS-PVM/MA sponges; and (c) density of plain CS, Avitene®, and CS-PVM/MA sponges. The “*” indicates a significant difference between the prepared sponge and Avitene when p < 0.05, while the “**” indicates a significant difference between the prepared sponge and Avitene when p < 0.01 (Student’s t-test, n = 3).
Figure 6.Water absorption rate of different sponges. The “*” indicates a significant difference between the prepared sponge and Avitene when p < 0.05, while the “**” indicates a significant difference between the prepared sponge and Avitene when p < 0.01 (Student’s t-test, n = 3).
Figure 7.Results of whole blood clotting experiment. The “*” indicates a significant difference between the prepared sponge and Avitene when p < 0.05, while the “**” indicates a significant difference between the prepared sponge and Avitene when p < 0.01 (Student’s t-test, n = 3).
Figure 8.Photographs of (a) mouse leg after removing the hair; (b) trauma model on femoral artery of mouse; and (c) the hemostatic effect of sponge on mouse.
Figure 9.Hemostasis time of different sponges on mouse femoral artery. The “*” indicates a significant difference between the prepared sponge and Avitene (p < 0.05, Student’s t-test, n = 12).