AIMS: To evaluate the impact of amyloid PET imaging on diagnosis and patient management in a multicenter, randomized, controlled study. METHODS:Physicians identified patients seeking a diagnosis for mild cognitive impairment or dementia, possibly due to Alzheimer disease (AD), and recorded a working diagnosis and a management plan. The patients underwent florbetapir PET scanning and were randomized to either immediate or delayed (1-year) feedback regarding amyloid status. At the 3-month visit, the physician updated the diagnosis and recorded a summary of the actual patient management since the post-scan visit. The study examined the impact of immediate versus delayed feedback on patient diagnosis/management at 3 and 12 months. RESULTS: A total of 618 subjects were randomized (1:1) to immediate or delayed feedback arms, and 602 subjects completed the 3-month primary endpoint visit. A higher proportion of patients in the immediate feedback arm showed a change in diagnosis compared to the controls (32.6 vs. 6.4%; p = 0.0001). Similarly, a higher proportion of patients receiving immediate feedback had a change in management plan (68 vs. 55.5%; p < 0.002), mainly driven by changes in AD medication. Specifically, acetylcholinesterase inhibitors were prescribed to 67% of the amyloid-positive and 27% of the amyloid-negative subjects in the information group compared with 56 and 43%, respectively, in the control group (p < 0.0001). These between-group differences persisted until the 12-month visit. CONCLUSION: Knowledge of the amyloid status affects the diagnosis and alters patient management.
RCT Entities:
AIMS: To evaluate the impact of amyloid PET imaging on diagnosis and patient management in a multicenter, randomized, controlled study. METHODS: Physicians identified patients seeking a diagnosis for mild cognitive impairment or dementia, possibly due to Alzheimer disease (AD), and recorded a working diagnosis and a management plan. The patients underwent florbetapir PET scanning and were randomized to either immediate or delayed (1-year) feedback regarding amyloid status. At the 3-month visit, the physician updated the diagnosis and recorded a summary of the actual patient management since the post-scan visit. The study examined the impact of immediate versus delayed feedback on patient diagnosis/management at 3 and 12 months. RESULTS: A total of 618 subjects were randomized (1:1) to immediate or delayed feedback arms, and 602 subjects completed the 3-month primary endpoint visit. A higher proportion of patients in the immediate feedback arm showed a change in diagnosis compared to the controls (32.6 vs. 6.4%; p = 0.0001). Similarly, a higher proportion of patients receiving immediate feedback had a change in management plan (68 vs. 55.5%; p < 0.002), mainly driven by changes in AD medication. Specifically, acetylcholinesterase inhibitors were prescribed to 67% of the amyloid-positive and 27% of the amyloid-negative subjects in the information group compared with 56 and 43%, respectively, in the control group (p < 0.0001). These between-group differences persisted until the 12-month visit. CONCLUSION: Knowledge of the amyloid status affects the diagnosis and alters patient management.
Authors: C G Schipke; O Peters; I Heuser; T Grimmer; M N Sabbagh; O Sabri; C Hock; M Kunz; J Kuhlmann; C Reininger; M Blankenburg Journal: Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord Date: 2012-07-20 Impact factor: 2.959
Authors: Bruno Dubois; Howard H Feldman; Claudia Jacova; Harald Hampel; José Luis Molinuevo; Kaj Blennow; Steven T DeKosky; Serge Gauthier; Dennis Selkoe; Randall Bateman; Stefano Cappa; Sebastian Crutch; Sebastiaan Engelborghs; Giovanni B Frisoni; Nick C Fox; Douglas Galasko; Marie-Odile Habert; Gregory A Jicha; Agneta Nordberg; Florence Pasquier; Gil Rabinovici; Philippe Robert; Christopher Rowe; Stephen Salloway; Marie Sarazin; Stéphane Epelbaum; Leonardo C de Souza; Bruno Vellas; Pieter J Visser; Lon Schneider; Yaakov Stern; Philip Scheltens; Jeffrey L Cummings Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2014-06 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: J Lewis; D W Dickson; W L Lin; L Chisholm; A Corral; G Jones; S H Yen; N Sahara; L Skipper; D Yager; C Eckman; J Hardy; M Hutton; E McGowan Journal: Science Date: 2001-08-24 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Abhinay D Joshi; Michael J Pontecorvo; Chrisopher M Clark; Alan P Carpenter; Danna L Jennings; Carl H Sadowsky; Lee P Adler; Karel D Kovnat; John P Seibyl; Anupa Arora; Krishnendu Saha; Jason D Burns; Mark J Lowrey; Mark A Mintun; Daniel M Skovronsky Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2012-02-13 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Anthony S Zannas; P Murali Doraiswamy; Katie S Shpanskaya; Kelly R Murphy; Jeffrey R Petrella; James R Burke; Terence Z Wong Journal: Neurocase Date: 2013-05-14 Impact factor: 0.881
Authors: Natalie Nelissen; Koen Van Laere; Lennart Thurfjell; Rikard Owenius; Mathieu Vandenbulcke; Michel Koole; Guy Bormans; David J Brooks; Rik Vandenberghe Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2009-07-17 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Michael Grundman; Keith A Johnson; Ming Lu; Andrew Siderowf; Grazia Dell'Agnello; Anupa K Arora; Daniel M Skovronsky; Mark A Mintun; Michael J Pontecorvo Journal: Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord Date: 2016-01-08 Impact factor: 2.959
Authors: Arno de Wilde; Wiesje M van der Flier; Wiesje Pelkmans; Femke Bouwman; Jurre Verwer; Colin Groot; Marieke M van Buchem; Marissa Zwan; Rik Ossenkoppele; Maqsood Yaqub; Marleen Kunneman; Ellen M A Smets; Frederik Barkhof; Adriaan A Lammertsma; Andrew Stephens; Erik van Lier; Geert Jan Biessels; Bart N van Berckel; Philip Scheltens Journal: JAMA Neurol Date: 2018-09-01 Impact factor: 18.302
Authors: Enrico R Fantoni; Anastasia Chalkidou; John T O' Brien; Gill Farrar; Alexander Hammers Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Date: 2018 Impact factor: 4.472
Authors: Michael J Pontecorvo; Michael D Devous; Ian Kennedy; Michael Navitsky; Ming Lu; Nicholas Galante; Stephen Salloway; P Murali Doraiswamy; Sudeepti Southekal; Anupa K Arora; Anne McGeehan; Nathaniel C Lim; Hui Xiong; Stephen P Truocchio; Abhinay D Joshi; Sergey Shcherbinin; Brian Teske; Adam S Fleisher; Mark A Mintun Journal: Brain Date: 2019-06-01 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Eva María Triviño-Ibáñez; Raquel Sánchez-Vañó; Pablo Sopena-Novales; Juan Carlos Romero-Fábrega; Antonio Rodríguez-Fernández; Cristóbal Carnero Pardo; María Dolores Martínez Lozano; Manuel Gómez-Río Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Date: 2019-07 Impact factor: 1.817
Authors: Clifford R Jack; Heather J Wiste; Hugo Botha; Stephen D Weigand; Terry M Therneau; David S Knopman; Jonathan Graff-Radford; David T Jones; Tanis J Ferman; Bradley F Boeve; Kejal Kantarci; Val J Lowe; Prashanthi Vemuri; Michelle M Mielke; Julie A Fields; Mary M Machulda; Christopher G Schwarz; Matthew L Senjem; Jeffrey L Gunter; Ronald C Petersen Journal: Brain Date: 2019-10-01 Impact factor: 13.501