Geraint B Rogers1, Kenneth D Bruce, Lucas R Hoffman. 1. aSouth Australian Health and Medical Research Institute bSAHMRI Microbiome Research Laboratory, School of Medicine, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia cKing's College London, Institute of Pharmaceutical Science, London, United Kingdom dDepartments of Pediatrics and Microbiology, University of Washington, Seattle eSeattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Almost 15 years have now passed since bacterial community profiling techniques were first used to analyse respiratory samples from people with cystic fibrosis. Since then, many different analytical approaches have been used to try to better understand the contribution of the cystic fibrosis lung microbiota to disease, with varying degrees of success. We examine the extent to which cystic fibrosis respiratory microbiome research has been successful in informing clinical decision-making, and highlight areas that we believe have the potential to yield important insight. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent research on the cystic fibrosis lung microbiome can be broadly divided into efforts to better characterize microbiota composition, particularly relative to key clinical events, and attempts to understand the cystic fibrosis lung microbiology as an interactive microbial system. The latter, in particular, has led to the development of a number of models in which microbiome-mediated processes precipitate clinical events. SUMMARY: Growing technological sophistication is enabling increasingly detailed microbiological data to be generated from cystic fibrosis respiratory samples. However, translating these data into clinically useful measures that accurately predict outcomes and guide treatments remains a formidable challenge. The development of systems biology approaches that enable the integration of complex microbiome and host-derived data provide an exciting opportunity to address this goal.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Almost 15 years have now passed since bacterial community profiling techniques were first used to analyse respiratory samples from people with cystic fibrosis. Since then, many different analytical approaches have been used to try to better understand the contribution of the cystic fibrosis lung microbiota to disease, with varying degrees of success. We examine the extent to which cystic fibrosis respiratory microbiome research has been successful in informing clinical decision-making, and highlight areas that we believe have the potential to yield important insight. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent research on the cystic fibrosis lung microbiome can be broadly divided into efforts to better characterize microbiota composition, particularly relative to key clinical events, and attempts to understand the cystic fibrosis lung microbiology as an interactive microbial system. The latter, in particular, has led to the development of a number of models in which microbiome-mediated processes precipitate clinical events. SUMMARY: Growing technological sophistication is enabling increasingly detailed microbiological data to be generated from cystic fibrosis respiratory samples. However, translating these data into clinically useful measures that accurately predict outcomes and guide treatments remains a formidable challenge. The development of systems biology approaches that enable the integration of complex microbiome and host-derived data provide an exciting opportunity to address this goal.
Authors: F Armougom; F Bittar; N Stremler; J-M Rolain; C Robert; J-C Dubus; J Sarles; D Raoult; B La Scola Journal: Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis Date: 2009-05-16 Impact factor: 3.267
Authors: Amanda F Goddard; Benjamin J Staudinger; Scot E Dowd; Amruta Joshi-Datar; Randall D Wolcott; Moira L Aitken; Corinne L Fligner; Pradeep K Singh Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2012-08-07 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: T W V Daniels; G B Rogers; F A Stressmann; C J van der Gast; K D Bruce; G R Jones; G J Connett; J P Legg; M P Carroll Journal: J Cyst Fibros Date: 2012-06-18 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Perry S Brown; Christopher E Pope; Robyn L Marsh; Xuan Qin; Sharon McNamara; Ronald Gibson; Jane L Burns; Gail Deutsch; Lucas R Hoffman Journal: Ann Am Thorac Soc Date: 2014-09
Authors: Bryan Coburn; Pauline W Wang; Julio Diaz Caballero; Shawn T Clark; Vijaya Brahma; Sylva Donaldson; Yu Zhang; Anu Surendra; Yunchen Gong; D Elizabeth Tullis; Yvonne C W Yau; Valerie J Waters; David M Hwang; David S Guttman Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2015-05-14 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Christopher D Sibley; Kangmin Duan; Carrie Fischer; Michael D Parkins; Douglas G Storey; Harvey R Rabin; Michael G Surette Journal: PLoS Pathog Date: 2008-10-24 Impact factor: 6.823
Authors: Thiago Inácio Teixeira do Carmo; Victor Emanuel Miranda Soares; Jonatha Wruck; Fernanda Dos Anjos; Débora Tavares de Resende E Silva; Sarah Franco Vieira de Oliveira Maciel; Margarete Dulce Bagatini Journal: Inflamm Res Date: 2021-04-27 Impact factor: 4.575