Literature DB >> 28785862

Administration options for pegfilgrastim prophylaxis: patient and physician preferences from a cross-sectional survey.

A Brett Hauber1, Brennan Mange1, Mark A Price2, Daniel Wolin3, Mark Bensink4, James A Kaye5, David Chandler4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Although clinical guidelines recommend administration of pegfilgrastim 1-4 days after a myelosuppressive chemotherapy cycle to decrease the incidence of febrile neutropenia (FN), some physicians administer pegfilgrastim on the same day as chemotherapy administration. A novel on-body injector (OBI) that automatically delivers pegfilgrastim the day after chemotherapy is also available. Our objective was to estimate patient and physician preferences among the pegfilgrastim administration options.
METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional survey of patients receiving pegfilgrastim and physicians prescribing pegfilgrastim. Respondents' preferences for pegfilgrastim administration options were elicited using direct elicitation; the relative importance of features associated with the options was estimated in a point-allocation exercise. Physicians considered two hypothetical patient profiles when completing the exercises.
RESULTS: The samples included 200 patients and 200 physicians. Patients generally preferred the administration option with which they had experience. Among patients, 48.5% with previous in-clinic injections 24 hours after chemotherapy preferred this option; 56.8% with previous OBI administration preferred this option. For a clinically compromised patient, 37.5% of physicians preferred an in-clinic injection option; 49.5% preferred the OBI. For a less compromised patient, 55.5% preferred an in-clinic injection option; 28.0% preferred the OBI. Avoiding the need to return to the clinic was chosen most often as the most important treatment feature for patients and physicians.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients and physicians identified that returning clinic visits for pegfilgrastim administration may be burdensome. A potential solution to mitigate this burden is the OBI, which allows adherence to the labeled use of pegfilgrastim without return visits to the clinic.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Febrile neutropenia; Patient; Pegfilgrastim; Physician; Preference

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28785862     DOI: 10.1007/s00520-017-3841-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Support Care Cancer        ISSN: 0941-4355            Impact factor:   3.603


  11 in total

1.  Assessing the impact of migraine onset on work productivity.

Authors:  Stephen H Landy; M Chris Runken; Christopher F Bell; Rachel L Higbie; Lisa S Haskins
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 2.162

2.  First and subsequent cycle use of pegfilgrastim prevents febrile neutropenia in patients with breast cancer: a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III study.

Authors:  Charles L Vogel; Marek Z Wojtukiewicz; Robert R Carroll; Sergei A Tjulandin; Luis Javier Barajas-Figueroa; Brian L Wiens; Theresa A Neumann; Lee S Schwartzberg
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-02-20       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  "Same-Day" administration of pegfilgrastim following myelosuppressive chemotherapy: clinical practice and provider rationale.

Authors:  Sarah Marion; Spiros Tzivelekis; Christina Darden; Mark A Price; Bintu Sherif; Jacob Garcia; James A Kaye; David Chandler
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2016-04-23       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Comparison of pharmacokinetics and safety of pegfilgrastim administered by two delivery methods: on-body injector and manual injection with a prefilled syringe.

Authors:  Bing-Bing Yang; Phuong Khanh Morrow; Xikun Wu; Michael Moxness; Desmond Padhi
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 3.333

5.  Comparison of current US risk strategy to screen for hepatitis C virus with a hypothetical targeted birth cohort strategy.

Authors:  Kenneth J Tomaszewski; Baris Deniz; Peter Tomanovich; Camilla S Graham
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 6.  Recommendations for the Use of WBC Growth Factors: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Update.

Authors:  Thomas J Smith; Kari Bohlke; Gary H Lyman; Kenneth R Carson; Jeffrey Crawford; Scott J Cross; John M Goldberg; James L Khatcheressian; Natasha B Leighl; Cheryl L Perkins; George Somlo; James L Wade; Antoinette J Wozniak; James O Armitage
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-07-13       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Generic substitution in the treatment of epilepsy: case evidence of breakthrough seizures.

Authors:  M J Berg; R A Gross; K J Tomaszewski; W M Zingaro; L S Haskins
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2008-08-12       Impact factor: 9.910

8.  Association of non-adherence to antiepileptic drugs and seizures, quality of life, and productivity: survey of patients with epilepsy and physicians.

Authors:  Collin A Hovinga; Miya R Asato; Ranjani Manjunath; James W Wheless; Stephanie J Phelps; Raj D Sheth; Jesus E Pina-Garza; Wendy M Zingaro; Lisa S Haskins
Journal:  Epilepsy Behav       Date:  2008-05-09       Impact factor: 2.937

9.  Risk and timing of neutropenic events in adult cancer patients receiving chemotherapy: the results of a prospective nationwide study of oncology practice.

Authors:  Jeffrey Crawford; David C Dale; Nicole M Kuderer; Eva Culakova; Marek S Poniewierski; Debra Wolff; Gary H Lyman
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 11.908

10.  Risk of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in cancer patients receiving pegfilgrastim prophylaxis: does timing of administration matter?

Authors:  Derek Weycker; Xiaoyan Li; Jacqueline Figueredo; Rich Barron; Spiros Tzivelekis; May Hagiwara
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 3.359

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Pegfilgrastim Biosimilars in US Supportive Oncology: A Narrative Review of Administration Options and Economic Considerations to Maximize Patient Benefit.

Authors:  Sophia Z Humphreys; Robert B Geller; Paul Walden
Journal:  Oncol Ther       Date:  2022-09-16

2.  Retrospective Analysis of Clinical Outcomes Associated With the Use of Pegfilgrastim On-body Injector in Patients Receiving Chemotherapy Requiring Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor Support.

Authors:  Jolly Patel; Rebecca Ann Rainess; Miranda J Benfield; Kate M L Rogers; Donald C Moore; Chris Larck; Justin R Arnall
Journal:  Hosp Pharm       Date:  2019-08-02

3.  Preferences for Adult Pneumococcal Vaccine Recommendations Among United States Health Care Providers.

Authors:  Patricia Sacco; Kelley Myers; Christine Poulos; Carolyn Sweeney; Kelly Hollis; Vincenza Snow; Jeffrey T Vietri
Journal:  Infect Dis Ther       Date:  2019-09-23

4.  Patient, nurse, and physician preferences: final results of the CONVENIENCE study evaluating pegfilgrastim prophylaxis via pre-filled syringe or on-body injector in cancer patients.

Authors:  Michael Metz; Dieter Semsek; Gunther Rogmans; Ulrich Hutzschenreuter; Thomas Fietz; Johanna Harde; Stefan Zacharias; Carsten Hielscher; Andreas Lorenz; Mark-Oliver Zahn; Dagmar Guth; Steffen Liebers; Michael Berghorn; Sina Grebhardt; Christiane D Matillon; Gerlinde Egerer; Karin Potthoff
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 3.603

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.