Literature DB >> 18319047

Risk and timing of neutropenic events in adult cancer patients receiving chemotherapy: the results of a prospective nationwide study of oncology practice.

Jeffrey Crawford1, David C Dale, Nicole M Kuderer, Eva Culakova, Marek S Poniewierski, Debra Wolff, Gary H Lyman.   

Abstract

This study was undertaken to describe the relationship between the occurrence and timing of neutropenic events and chemotherapy treatment in a community-based population of patients with cancer. The study included 2962 patients with breast, lung, colorectal, lymphoma, and ovarian cancers from a prospective U.S. registry of patients initiating a new chemotherapy regimen. Detailed patient-, disease-, and treatment-related data, including toxicities, were captured at baseline, the beginning of each cycle, and each midcycle blood draw for up to 4 cycles of treatment. Primary outcomes included febrile neutropenia (FN), severe neutropenia without fever/ infection, and relative dose intensity (RDI). Thirty-seven percent of patients were aged 65 years or older, 43.5% had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 1 or greater, and 27% had 1 or more comorbidities. Reductions in RDI to less than 85% of standard in the first cycle were planned in 23.6% of patients, whereas primary colony-stimulating factor prophylaxis was used in 18.2%. In the first 3 cycles of treatment, 10.7% of patients experienced FN, with most of these events (58.9%) occurring in the first cycle. This first-cycle pattern was consistently observed despite wide variations in event rates by tumor type, disease stage, chemotherapy regimen and dose, and patient characteristics. Despite frequent planned reductions from standard RDI, the incidence of FN remains high in community oncology practice in the United States. Improved methods of pretreatment assessment of patient risk factors for neutropenia are needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18319047     DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2008.0012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw        ISSN: 1540-1405            Impact factor:   11.908


  84 in total

1.  Usage of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor every 2 days is clinically useful and cost-effective for febrile neutropenia during early courses of chemotherapy.

Authors:  Yoshihiro Yakushijin; Hisaharu Shikata; Ikue Takaoka; Tamami Horikawa; Kazuhito Takeuchi; Jun Yamanouchi; Taichi Azuma; Hiroshi Narumi; Takaaki Hato; Masaki Yasukawa
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Re: personalized medicine and cancer supportive care: appropriate use of colony-stimulating factor support of chemotherapy.

Authors:  Arnold L Potosky; Jennifer L Malin; Benjamin Kim; Elizabeth A Chrischilles; Jane C Weeks
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2011-10-28       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Reversal of chemotherapy-induced leukopenia using granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor promotes bone metastasis that can be blocked with osteoclast inhibitors.

Authors:  Jinlu Dai; Yi Lu; Chunyan Yu; Jill M Keller; Atsushi Mizokami; Jian Zhang; Evan T Keller
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2010-05-25       Impact factor: 12.701

4.  National Cancer Institute Cancer Center designation and 30-day mortality for hospitalized, immunocompromised cancer patients.

Authors:  Christopher R Friese; Jeffrey H Silber; Linda H Aiken
Journal:  Cancer Invest       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.176

5.  Personalized medicine and cancer supportive care: appropriate use of colony-stimulating factor support of chemotherapy.

Authors:  Nicole M Kuderer; Gary H Lyman
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2011-06-13       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  Dose intensity in early-stage breast cancer: a community practice experience.

Authors:  Robert L Bretzel; Ralph Cameron; Marc Gustas; Maria A Garcia; Heather K Hoffman; Rosalind Malhotra; Karen Miller; Janine Prime; Anne Favret
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 3.840

7.  Neutrophil count in African Americans: lowering the target cutoff to initiate or resume chemotherapy?

Authors:  Matthew M Hsieh; John F Tisdale; Griffin P Rodgers; Neal S Young; Edward L Trimble; Richard F Little
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 8.  Outpatient care of patients with acute myeloid leukemia: Benefits, barriers, and future considerations.

Authors:  Jennifer E Vaughn; Sarah A Buckley; Roland B Walter
Journal:  Leuk Res       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 3.156

Review 9.  The association of hyperglycemia and diabetes mellitus and the risk of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia among cancer patients: A systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ebtihag O Alenzi; George A Kelley
Journal:  J Diabetes Complications       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 2.852

10.  Use of pegfilgrastim primary prophylaxis and risk of infection, by chemotherapy cycle and regimen, among patients with breast cancer or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Authors:  Wendy J Langeberg; Conchitina C Siozon; John H Page; P K Morrow; Victoria M Chia
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 3.603

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.