Literature DB >> 28785664

Hypertension should be ruled out in patients with hyperdynamic left ventricle on radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging, diastolic dysfunction and dyspnea on exertion.

Fatih Yalçin1, Thomas Schindler2, Theodore P Abraham1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diastolic dysfunction; Dyspnea on exertion; Hyperdynamic left ventricle; Hypertension; Radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging

Year:  2015        PMID: 28785664      PMCID: PMC5497229          DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2015.04.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc        ISSN: 2352-9067


× No keyword cloud information.
We have read with great interest the report by Gorantla RS. et al. [1] on the relation of hyperdynamic myocardial response to stress induction and diastolic dysfunction using radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging [1]. They evaluated the patients presenting dyspnea on exertion (DOE) who were found to have hyperdynamic left ventricle (equal or greater LVEF than 70%) on stress radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging and diastolic dysfunction on echocardiography. They selected the study group who had no evidence of reversible ischemia in addition to hyperdynamic LV function. They concluded that hyperdynamic LV function is a significant predictor of diastolic dysfunction in the patients with DOE who have no evidence of ischemia. In the result part of the article, there is no information regarding the prevalence of hypertension in the study group. Hypertension and concentric LV remodeling were mentioned in the paper; however, we strongly believe that prevalence of resting hypertension and blood pressure response to exercise in normotensives at rest in all study groups should be mentioned. Association between hyperdynamic LV function and exaggerated blood pressure response to exercise in normotensive subjects at rest was described precisely using first-pass radionuclide angiography long time ago [2]. In a large group of healthy individuals who developed exercise-induced LV remodeling, we recently have pointed out the importance of complete elimination of this phenomenon in diagnosis of physiologic LVH [3]. Even in healthy individuals, this phenomenon can be associated with increased incidence of hypertensive LV remodeling which was clearly shown by Gottdiener et al. [4]. In hypertensive patients with LV remodeling, hyperdynamic LV could be related to increased sympathetic response to stress induction. In fact, correlation between increased sympathetic activity and LV myocardial mass was shown precisely by microneurography in hypertension [5]. In addition to cardiac index and ejection fraction determination during stress test as mentioned above, hyperdynamic LV could be determined on tissue level. In fact, we found stress-induced hyperdynamic LV performance in hypertensive individuals using combined tissue Doppler imaging and stress induction [6]. We also suggested that this comprehensive approach in follow-up of hypertensive patients could contribute to early management to prevent heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, predominantly seen in hypertension, female gender [7]. The authors also mentioned that cardiac etiology for this group of patients with DOE could be alternated as diastolic dysfunction or heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. However, hypertension could possibly be mentioned as the potential etiologic reason in the conclusion, because in addition to DOE and diastolic dysfunction, majority of hypertensive patients also have stress-induced hyperdynamic LV function [8], [9]. It is known that blood pressure measurement at exercise may have prognostic information in healthy individuals [10]. In fact, previously undiagnosed cases are not rare and becoming important health problems, in fact, some part of missed hypertensive patients could be associated with target organ damage [11]. We have mentioned in a large review that the diagnosis of exaggerated hypertension as well as the determination of increased rate-pressure product at peak exercise may need more comprehensive evaluation during exercise test [12]. Nevertheless, lack of prevalence of hypertension and hemodynamic data under exercise stress could have been mentioned in the article of Gorantla RS. et al. [1]. Therefore, physicians should pay more attention to exercise-induced increases in arterial blood pressure as it may raise the awareness of early developing arterial hypertension and end organ damage may be prevented if appropriate preventive medical care is installed in a timely fashion.
  11 in total

1.  Prognostic significance of exercise blood pressure and heart rate in middle-aged men.

Authors:  J Filipovský; P Ducimetière; M E Safar
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 10.190

2.  Letter by Yalcin et al regarding article, "Left ventricular wall thickness and the presence of asymmetric hypertrophy in healthy young army recruits: data from the LARGE Heart Study".

Authors:  Fatih Yalçin; Theodore P Abraham; John S Gottdiener
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 7.792

3.  Exaggerated systolic blood pressure response to exercise: a normal variant or a hyperdynamic phase of essential hypertension?

Authors:  A S Iskandrian; J Heo
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 4.164

4.  Hyperdynamic myocardial response to beta-adrenergic stimulation in patients with chest pain and normal coronary arteries.

Authors:  Juraj Madaric; Jozef Bartunek; Katia Verhamme; Martin Penicka; Eddy Van Schuerbeeck; Paul Nellens; Guy R Heyndrickx; William Wijns; Marc Vanderheyden; Bernard De Bruyne
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2005-10-04       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Left ventricular hypertrophy in men with normal blood pressure: relation to exaggerated blood pressure response to exercise.

Authors:  J S Gottdiener; J Brown; J Zoltick; R D Fletcher
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1990-02-01       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 6.  Quantitative left ventricular contractility analysis under stress: a new practical approach in follow-up of hypertensive patients.

Authors:  F Yalçin; H Yalçin; N Küçükler; T P Abraham
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2010-11-25       Impact factor: 3.012

7.  Relation between cardiac sympathetic activity and hypertensive left ventricular hypertrophy.

Authors:  Markus P Schlaich; David M Kaye; Elisabeth Lambert; Marcus Sommerville; Flora Socratous; Murray D Esler
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2003-07-07       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Target organ damage and cardiovascular risk factors among subjects with previously undiagnosed hypertension.

Authors:  Päivi E Korhonen; Hannu Kautiainen; Salme Järvenpää; Ilkka Kantola
Journal:  Eur J Prev Cardiol       Date:  2013-01-18       Impact factor: 7.804

9.  Hypercontractile cardiac states simulating hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  P C Come; B H Bulkley; Z D Goodman; G M Hutchins; B Pitt; N J Fortuin
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1977-06       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 10.  Stress induced hypertensive response: should it be evaluated more carefully?

Authors:  Nagehan Kucukler; Fatih Yalçin; Theodore P Abraham; Mario J Garcia
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2011-08-16       Impact factor: 2.062

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Basal Septal Hypertrophy as the Early Imaging Biomarker for Adaptive Phase of Remodeling Prior to Heart Failure.

Authors:  Fatih Yalçin; Hulya Yalçin; Nagehan Küçükler; Serbay Arslan; Oguz Akkuş; Alparslan Kurtul; Maria Roselle Abraham
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-12-24       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 2.  Hemodynamic stress and microscopic remodeling.

Authors:  Fatih Yalçin; Hulya Yalçin; Roselle Abraham; Theodore P Abraham
Journal:  Int J Cardiol Cardiovasc Risk Prev       Date:  2021-11-02
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.