| Literature DB >> 28785652 |
Bjorn Cools1, Werner Budts2, Ruth Heying1, Derize Boshoff1, Benedicte Eyskens1, Stefan Frerich3, Els Troost2, Marc Gewillig1.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Data on long term function of the Melody valve are scarce. Patients and methods: single institution; results of percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation (PPVI) from 2006 to 2014. The function of the valved conduit was analyzed by Doppler echocardiography. Annual Chest X-ray after implant and permanent screening for events (e.g. Endocarditis).Entities:
Keywords: Endocarditis; Melody valved stent; Percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation; Pre-stenting; Stent fracture
Year: 2015 PMID: 28785652 PMCID: PMC5497227 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2015.02.014
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc ISSN: 2352-9067
Echocardiographic data PPVI.
| Indication for PPVI | Before implant | SD | After implant | SD | p-Values | 3 years after implant | SD | p-Value | 5 years after implant | SD | p-Value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stenosis PS | n = 48 | Mean | Mean | Mean | Mean | |||||||
| RVOT gradient (mm Hg) | 67.0 | 13.9 | 18.9 | 10.4 | < 0.001 | 27.4 | 13.0 | 0.330 | 30.6 | 9.6 | 0.220 | |
| RVOT Vmax (cm/s) | 3.5 | 0.7 | 1.7 | 0.85 | < 0.001 | 2.5 | 0.5 | 0.163 | 2.7 | 0.4 | 0.122 | |
| Regurgitation PR | n = 36 | |||||||||||
| Median | Range | Median | Range | Median | Range | Median | Range | |||||
| PR (grade at 4) | 3.5 | 0–4 | 0.25 | 0–1 | < 0.001 | 0.5 | 0–1 | 0.729 | 0.5 | 0–2 | 0.835 | |
| Mixed PS and PR | n = 26 | |||||||||||
| Mean | Mean | Mean | Mean | |||||||||
| RVOT gradient (mm Hg) | 52.5 | 11.1 | 20.9 | 8.5 | < 0.001 | 31.3 | 19.9 | 0.824 | 38.0 | 18 | 0.689 | |
| RVOT Vmax (cm/s) | 3.3 | 0.9 | 2.0 | 0.75 | < 0.001 | 2.6 | 0.9 | 0.103 | 3.0 | 0.9 | 0.417 | |
| Median | Range | Median | Range | Median | Range | Median | Range | |||||
| PR (grade at 4) | 2 | 0–3 | 0 | 0–2 | < 0.001 | 1 | 0–1 | 0.979 | 1 | 0–1 | 0.505 | |
Pulmonary regurgitation is expressed in grade: 0 = none, 1 = slight, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate and 4 = severe.
Statistical difference with baseline condition (before implant).
Fig. 1Evolution of peak Doppler RVOT gradient expressed in mm Hg before, immediately after implant and during follow-up. Indication for PPVI: (blue) pulmonary stenosis, (green) pulmonary regurgitation, (brown) mixed PS/PR and (purple) overall the 3 groups. Error bars express the 95% confidence interval. Valves at risk: pre: 112; post 111; 1 year: 90; 3 years: 36; 5 years: 10.
Fig. 2Evolution of pulmonary regurgitation before, immediately after implant and during follow-up. Indication for PPVI: (blue) pulmonary stenosis, (green) pulmonary regurgitation, (brown) mixed PS/PR and (purple) overall the 3 groups. Error Bars express the 95% confidence interval. Valves at risk: pre: 112; post 111; 1 year: 90; 3 years: 36; 5 years: 10.
Fig. 3Kaplan Meier survival analysis free from re-intervention. The green line shows the valve related freedom from re-intervention, the blue line is the overall freedom from re-intervention including e.g. balloon dilation for somatic growth. Valves at risk: time 0: 112; 2 years: 55; 4 years: 20; 6 years: 8.
Fig. 4Kaplan Meier survival free from stent fractures. The indication for PPVI was (blue) pulmonary stenosis, (green) pulmonary regurgitation, (brown) mixed PS/PR and ](purple) overall the 3 groups. Log rank p = 0.910. Valves at risk: time 0: 112; 2 years: 57; 4 years: 18; 6 years: 9.
Fig. 5Kaplan Meier survival free from endocarditis. Valves at risk: time 0: 112; 2 years: 59; 4 years: 26; 6 years: 11.