Literature DB >> 28784484

Validation of projective mapping as potential sensory screening tool for application by the honeybush herbal tea industry.

Erika Ilette Moelich1, Magdalena Muller2, Elizabeth Joubert3, Tormod Næs4, Martin Kidd5.   

Abstract

Honeybush herbal tea is produced from the endemic South African Cyclopia species. Plant material subjected to a high-temperature oxidation step ("fermentation") forms the bulk of production. Production lags behind demand forcing tea merchants to use blends of available material to supply local and international markets. The distinct differences in the sensory profiles of the herbal tea produced from the different Cyclopia species require that special care is given to blending to ensure a consistent, high quality product. Although conventional descriptive sensory analysis (DSA) is highly effective in providing a detailed sensory profile of herbal tea infusions, industry requires a method that is more time- and cost-effective. Recent advances in sensory science have led to the development of rapid profiling methodologies. The question is whether projective mapping can successfully be used for the sensory characterisation of herbal tea infusions. Trained assessors performed global and partial projective mapping to determine the validity of this technique for the sensory characterisation of infusions of five Cyclopia species. Similar product configurations were obtained when comparing results of DSA and global and partial projective mapping. Comparison of replicate sessions showed RV coefficients >0.8. A similarity index, based on multifactor analysis, was calculated to determine assessor repeatability. Global projective mapping, demonstrated to be a valid method for providing a broad sensory characterisation of Cyclopia species, is thus suitable as a rapid quality control method of honeybush infusions. Its application by the honeybush industry could improve the consistency of the sensory profile of blended products.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cyclopia species; Descriptive sensory analysis; Multiple factor analysis; Panel performance; Projective mapping; Similarity index

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28784484     DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2017.05.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Food Res Int        ISSN: 0963-9969            Impact factor:   6.475


  2 in total

1.  Preference Ranking Procedure: Method Validation with Dogs.

Authors:  Han Li; Rachel Wyant; Greg Aldrich; Kadri Koppel
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-19       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 2.  An Overview of Sensory Characterization Techniques: From Classical Descriptive Analysis to the Emergence of Novel Profiling Methods.

Authors:  Catarina Marques; Elisete Correia; Lia-Tânia Dinis; Alice Vilela
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2022-01-18
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.