Literature DB >> 28784170

Pregnancy, pregnancy loss, and the risk of cardiovascular disease in Chinese women: findings from the China Kadoorie Biobank.

Sanne A E Peters1, Ling Yang2, Yu Guo3, Yiping Chen2, Zheng Bian3, Xiaocao Tian4, Liang Chang5, Shuo Zhang6, Jiaqiu Liu7, Tao Wang8, Junshi Chen9, Liming Li3,10, Mark Woodward1,11,12, Zhengming Chen13.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pregnancy and pregnancy loss may be linked to cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, the evidence is still inconsistent, especially in East Asians, whose reproductive patterns differ importantly from those in the West. We examined the associations of pregnancy, miscarriage, induced abortion, and stillbirth with CVD incidence among Chinese women.
METHODS: In 2004-2008, the nationwide China Kadoorie Biobank recruited 302,669 women aged 30-79 years from ten diverse localities. During 7 years of follow-up, 43,968 incident cases of circulatory disease, 14,440 of coronary heart disease, and 19,925 of stroke (including 11,430 ischaemic and 2170 haemorrhagic strokes), were recorded among 289,573 women without prior CVD at baseline. Cox regression yielded multiple adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for CVD risks associated with pregnancy outcomes.
RESULTS: Overall, 99% of women had been pregnant, and among them 10%, 53%, and 7% reported having a history of miscarriage, induced abortion, and stillbirth, respectively. Each additional pregnancy was associated with an adjusted HR of 1.03 (95% confidence interval, CI: 1.02; 1.04) for circulatory disease. A history of miscarriage, induced abortion, and stillbirth, respectively, were associated with adjusted HRs of 1.04 (1.01; 1.07), 1.04 (1.02; 1.07), and 1.07 (1.03; 1.11) for circulatory disease. The relationship was stronger with recurrent pregnancy loss; adjusted HRs for each additional loss being 1.04 (1.00; 1.09) for miscarriage, 1.02 (1.01; 1.04) for induced abortion, and 1.04 (1.00; 1.08) for stillbirth.
CONCLUSIONS: Among Chinese women, increases in pregnancy, and a history and recurrence of miscarriage, induced abortion, and stillbirth are each associated with a higher risk of CVD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28784170      PMCID: PMC5547470          DOI: 10.1186/s12916-017-0912-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Med        ISSN: 1741-7015            Impact factor:   8.775


Background

Pregnancy poses a substantial challenge to the cardiovascular system of the mother [1-3], with most, but not all, studies suggesting that the number of pregnancies is positively associated with maternal risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) [4-6]. Globally, pregnancy loss is common — up to 20% of pregnancies end in a miscarriage [7], 35 induced abortions occurred annually per 1000 women aged 15–44 years worldwide in 2010–2014 [8], and an estimated 2.6 million stillbirths occurred in 2015 [9]. Several behavioural, biological, and socioeconomic factors related to pregnancy loss are also involved in the aetiology of CVD. However, despite possible shared aetiology, the long-term effects of miscarriage, induced abortion, and stillbirth on risk of CVD remain uncertain. A history of miscarriage or recurrent miscarriage has been linked to a higher risk of coronary heart disease (CHD), but not stroke, in previous studies, yet small study sizes, retrospective design, and inadequate adjustment for confounding factors hamper definitive conclusions [10]. Evidence relating induced abortion or stillbirth to CVD is scant and, where available, primarily comes from Western populations [11-13]. Examination of cardiovascular implications of pregnancy and pregnancy loss is particularly relevant to China, where the incidence of CVD is rising and reproductive patterns have changed considerably — not only following the introduction of the one child per family policy in the late 1970s — yet remain importantly different compared to those in the West [14]. We examined the association of pregnancy and pregnancy loss with risk of circulatory disease, CHD, and stroke, including its major subtypes, in women from the China Kadoorie Biobank (CKB) [15], a contemporary prospective cohort study in ten geographically diverse regions in China.

Methods

Baseline survey

Detailed information about the design of, and procedures in, CKB has previously been reported [15]. Briefly, 302,669 women and 210,222 men were recruited from five urban and five rural areas of China between June 2004 and July 2008. At the study assessment clinics, trained health workers administered a laptop-based questionnaire on demographic and socioeconomic status, lifestyle factors, and personal and family medical history. This included women’s reproductive factors, with information solicited on the number of pregnancies, miscarriages, induced abortions, and stillbirths. A range of physical measurements (e.g. height, weight, waist, blood pressure) were also taken using standard methods. A blood sample was collected for long-term storage and future analyses.

Follow-up for morbidity and mortality

Study participants were followed for cause-specific morbidity and mortality through linkage with regional disease and death registers and with the national health insurance (HI) system. Causes of death were obtained from official death certificates and were, where necessary, supplemented by reviews of medical records. Data linkage with HI agencies was carried out every 6 months to retrieve all coded hospitalised events occurring in that period for study participants. To minimise attrition, active follow-up was performed annually. The main disease endpoints, based on the tenth edition of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10), for the present study were incident CHD (ICD-10 I20–I25), stroke (I60–I61, I63–I64), and all circulatory diseases (I00–I99). Haemorrhagic stroke (I61) and ischaemic stroke (I63) were secondary endpoints. Participants contributed only the first outcome (whether non-fatal or fatal) experienced during follow-up.

Statistical analyses

The present analysis involves all women without a self-reported history of CHD or stroke at baseline (n = 289,573). Analyses on the association between pregnancy loss and CVD outcomes were restricted to women who had ever been pregnant (n = 282,797). Baseline characteristics are presented as means (standard deviation) for continuous variables and as percentages for categorical variables. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for incident circulatory disease, CHD, and stroke by number of pregnancies, miscarriages, induced abortions, and stillbirths. The Cox proportional hazards assumption was checked using log cumulative hazard plots and appeared to be reasonable. All analyses were stratified by age at risk and area of residence and adjusted for highest level of education attained (none, primary, secondary, tertiary or above), household income (<5000 yuan, 5000–19,999 yuan, ≥20,000 yuan), smoking (current, former, never), alcohol use (weekly, occasionally, never), physical activity, systolic blood pressure (SBP), history of hypertension, body mass index (BMI), and history of diabetes at baseline. Analyses for miscarriage, induced abortion, and stillbirth were additionally adjusted for number of live births and, where appropriate, number of miscarriages, induced abortions, and stillbirths. For comparisons involving more than two groups, CIs were estimated using floating absolute risks [16]. In analyses restricted to women who had ever been pregnant, we estimated the HRs and CIs per additional pregnancy. Similarly, the HRs and CIs per additional miscarriage, induced abortion, or stillbirth were estimated among women who had experienced at least one miscarriage, induced abortion, or stillbirth. Subgroup analyses were conducted to obtain the HRs and CIs for incident circulatory disease, CHD, and stroke per additional pregnancy, miscarriage, induced abortion, or stillbirth by study region, age group, highest level of attained education, BMI, smoking status, history of diabetes, and history of hypertension. Separate models were fitted within each subgroup and tests for heterogeneity and trend were used to test for differences between subgroups. The heterogeneity test tests the null hypothesis that the coefficients of the variable of interest are zero for all subgroups against the alternative that at least one of them is not. The test statistic has a chi-squared distribution because it is a sum of independent N(0, 1) variables, due to its use of floating standard errors. The trend test tests whether the (independent normally distributed) coefficients follow a linear trend, for which the test statistic has a chi-squared distribution with one degree of freedom under the null. Analyses were performed using SAS version 9.3 and R version 3.1.2.

Results

Overall, the mean baseline age was 57 years, and 99% of women had ever been pregnant (Table 1). Among those who had ever been pregnant, 10% had a history of miscarriage, 53% had a history of induced abortion, and 7% had a history of stillbirth. Although the baseline characteristics of women who had been pregnant only once were generally more favourable compared to those of women who had never been pregnant or who had been pregnant multiple times, stratification for age and study area largely attenuated these differences (Additional file 1: Table S1). Women with a history of miscarriage had a lower prevalence of induced abortion or stillbirth compared to women without a history of miscarriage (Additional file 1: Table S2). Women with a history of induced abortion had a lower prevalence of miscarriage or stillbirth compared to women without a history of induced abortion (Additional file 1: Table S3). The prevalence of miscarriage was higher and the prevalence of induced abortion was lower among women with a history of stillbirth compared to women without a history of stillbirth (Additional file 1: Table S4).
Table 1

Baseline characteristics of study participants by number of pregnancies

Total0 pregnancies1 pregnancy2 pregnancies3 pregnancies4 pregnancies≥5 pregnancies
Number of women (N)289,5732809 (1.0)26,891 (9.3)76,137 (26.3)76,802 (26.5)50,779 (17.5)56,155 (19.4)
Rural, %56.840.137.956.358.459.661.0
Age, years50.5 (10.3)49.9 (11.5)44.2 (7.7)46.1 (8.0)49.4 (9.0)53.1 (9.9)58.8 (10.4)
Education level, %
 Primary or below56.843.332.649.356.162.674.7
 Secondary or above43.256.767.450.743.937.425.3
Household income, %
 Low10.212.15.36.88.411.518.4
 Middle49.152.343.746.948.950.653.5
 High40.735.651.146.442.837.928.1
Current smoking, %4.96.73.42.94.05.68.9
Regular alcohol use, %36.542.141.735.736.336.435.2
Physical activity (MET hours/day)17.2 (11.0, 28.7)14.8 (9.3, 24.7)20.3 (12.8, 31.8)20.4 (12.3, 32.3)18.3 (11.2, 30.0)15.7 (10.3, 26.6)12.9 (8.4, 21.1)
Systolic blood pressure, mmHg129.4 (21.8)127.7 (23.0)123.0 (18.6)126.1 (19.9)128.7 (21.3)131.6 (22.3)136.0 (23.8)
Body mass index, kg/m2 23.8 (3.4)23.4 (3.8)23.6 (3.3)23.7 (3.3)23.8 (3.4)23.9 (3.5)23.8 (3.6)
History of hypertension, %10.29.05.57.29.712.415.6
History of diabetes, %2.92.71.41.82.63.34.9
Pregnancy loss, %
 History of miscarriage9.80.62.37.312.221.2
 History of induced abortion52.81.344.460.265.165.1
 History of stillbirth6.50.31.24.07.214.7
Ever use of oral contraceptives, %9.82.25.68.410.911.711.0

Values are percentages for categorical variables, and means and standard deviations for continuous variables, expect for physical activity where median and 25th and 75th percentiles are shown

MET metabolic equivalent

Baseline characteristics of study participants by number of pregnancies Values are percentages for categorical variables, and means and standard deviations for continuous variables, expect for physical activity where median and 25th and 75th percentiles are shown MET metabolic equivalent During a median of 7.1 years (Q1: 6.2; Q3: 8.1) follow-up, 43,968 incident cases of circulatory disease were recorded, including 14,440 cases of CHD, 19,925 cases of stroke, 11,430 cases of ischaemic stroke, and 2170 cases of haemorrhagic stroke.

Pregnancy and CVD risks

There was no difference in the risk of circulatory disease comparing gravid women to nulligravid women; adjusted HR (95% CI) 0.98 (0.89; 1.07). However, in gravid women, there was a log-linear association between the number of pregnancies and the risk of circulatory disease (Table 2 and Additional file 1: Figure S1), with adjusted HRs of 1.00 (0.96; 1.04), 1.07 (1.04; 1.09), 1.10 (1.08; 1.12), 1.13 (1.11; 1.15), and 1.19 (1.16; 1.22) for one (reference group), two, three, four, and five or more pregnancies, respectively. This dose-response relationship was consistent between women from rural and urban areas (Fig. 1). Each additional pregnancy was associated with a 1.03 (1.02; 1.04) higher risk of circulatory disease, with some indication of stronger effects among ever smokers or those with a history of hypertension (Fig. 2). Findings were similar in the analyses for CHD, stroke, and stroke subtypes (Table 2, Additional file 1: Table S5, and Figures S2 and S3).
Table 2

Adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) for incident coronary heart disease, stroke, and circulatory disease associated with number of pregnancies, miscarriages, induced abortions, and stillbirths

CHDStrokeCirculatory disease
No. eventsHR (95% CI)No. eventsHR (95% CI)No. eventsHR (95% CI)
Pregnancies
Ever vs. never 0.91 (0.78; 1.06) 0.98 (0.86; 1.12) 0.98 (0.89; 1.07)
 None1661.20 (1.03; 1.40)2111.06 (0.93; 1.22)4291.14 (1.04; 1.26)
 17791.00 (0.93; 1.08)9941.00 (0.94; 1.07)23331.00 (0.96; 1.04)
 225341.01 (0.96; 1.05)35010.99 (0.95; 1.02)89151.07 (1.04; 1.09)
 333061.03 (1.00; 1.07)47181.02 (0.99; 1.05)11,1931.10 (1.08; 1.12)
 430211.14 (1.10; 1.18)40641.03 (1.00; 1.06)88041.13 (1.11; 1.15)
  ≥ 546341.19 (1.15; 1.24)64371.09 (1.05; 1.13)12,2941.19 (1.16; 1.22)
Per additional a 1.04 (1.03; 1.05) 1.02 (1.02; 1.03) 1.03 (1.02; 1.04)
Miscarriages
Ever vs. never b 1.07 (1.02; 1.13) 1.04 (1.00; 1.09) 1.04 (1.01; 1.07)
None12,6291.00 (0.98; 1.02)17,4971.00 (0.98; 1.02)39,0891.00 (0.99; 1.01)
 112201.04 (0.98; 1.10)16951.04 (0.99; 1.09)33901.01 (0.98; 1.05)
 23041.19 (1.06; 1.33)3741.09 (0.99; 1.21)7791.12 (1.05; 1.21)
  ≥ 31211.26 (1.05; 1.51)1481.15 (0.98; 1.36)2811.12 (0.99; 1.26)
Per additional a 1.07 (1.01; 1.14) 1.04 (0.98; 1.10) 1.04 (1.00; 1.09)
Induced abortions
Ever vs. never b 1.11 (1.06; 1.15) 1.04 (1.01; 1.07) 1.04 (1.02; 1.07)
 None73341.00 (0.97; 1.03)10,0711.00 (0.98; 1.02)22,7751.00 (0.98; 1.02)
 137141.08 (1.05; 1.11)52171.04 (1.01; 1.06)11,8341.04 (1.02; 1.06)
 221601.13 (1.08; 1.18)29041.05 (1.01; 1.09)60321.05 (1.02; 1.07)
  ≥ 310661.14 (1.07; 1.21)15221.09 (1.04; 1.15)28981.09 (1.05; 1.13)
Per additional a 1.02 (1.00; 1.05) 1.03 (1.00; 1.05) 1.02 (1.01; 1.04)
Stillbirths
Ever vs. never b 1.00 (0.94; 1.07) 1.06 (1.01; 1.12) 1.07 (1.03; 1.11)
 None13,0781.00 (0.96; 1.04)17,8461.00 (0.97; 1.03)40,0521.00 (0.98; 1.02)
 18220.96 (0.90; 1.02)13551.05 (1.00; 1.11)25381.05 (1.01; 1.09)
 22401.08 (0.95; 1.23)3681.13 (1.02; 1.25)6621.12 (1.04; 1.21)
  ≥ 31341.31 (1.10; 1.56)1450.99 (0.84; 1.17)2871.13 (1.01; 1.28)
Per additional a 1.13 (1.06; 1.20) 1.02 (0.96; 1.08) 1.04 (1.00; 1.08)

HRs are stratified by age and study area, and adjusted for level of attained education, household income, smoking status, alcohol use, systolic blood pressure, history of hypertension, physical activity, body mass index, and history of diabetes. Analyses for miscarriage, induced abortion, and stillbirth were additionally adjusted for number of live births, and where appropriate, number of miscarriages, induced abortions, and stillbirths. aAnalyses are restricted to women with at least one pregnancy, miscarriage, induced abortion, or stillbirth, respectively. bAnalyses are restricted to women with at least one pregnancy

Fig. 1

Adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals (CIs)) for incident circulatory disease associated with number of pregnancies and pregnancy losses. Analyses are stratified by age at risk and study area and adjusted for level of attained education, household income, smoking status, alcohol use, systolic blood pressure, history of hypertension, physical activity, body mass index, and history of diabetes. Analyses for pregnancy loss are additionally adjusted for number of live births. The hazard ratios are plotted on a floating absolute scale. Each square has an area inversely proportional to the standard error of the log risk. Vertical lines indicate the corresponding 95% CIs. Analyses for pregnancy loss are among women with at least one pregnancy

Fig. 2

Adjusted hazard ratios for incident circulatory disease per additional pregnancy (left) and induced abortion (right) by baseline characteristics. Adjustments are as in Table 2. Each square has an area inversely proportional to the standard error of the log risk. The diamond indicates the overall risk of circulatory disease per additional pregnancy and induced abortion and its 95% CI. Analyses for pregnancy and induced abortion, respectively, are among women with at least one pregnancy or at least one induced abortion

Adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) for incident coronary heart disease, stroke, and circulatory disease associated with number of pregnancies, miscarriages, induced abortions, and stillbirths HRs are stratified by age and study area, and adjusted for level of attained education, household income, smoking status, alcohol use, systolic blood pressure, history of hypertension, physical activity, body mass index, and history of diabetes. Analyses for miscarriage, induced abortion, and stillbirth were additionally adjusted for number of live births, and where appropriate, number of miscarriages, induced abortions, and stillbirths. aAnalyses are restricted to women with at least one pregnancy, miscarriage, induced abortion, or stillbirth, respectively. bAnalyses are restricted to women with at least one pregnancy Adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals (CIs)) for incident circulatory disease associated with number of pregnancies and pregnancy losses. Analyses are stratified by age at risk and study area and adjusted for level of attained education, household income, smoking status, alcohol use, systolic blood pressure, history of hypertension, physical activity, body mass index, and history of diabetes. Analyses for pregnancy loss are additionally adjusted for number of live births. The hazard ratios are plotted on a floating absolute scale. Each square has an area inversely proportional to the standard error of the log risk. Vertical lines indicate the corresponding 95% CIs. Analyses for pregnancy loss are among women with at least one pregnancy Adjusted hazard ratios for incident circulatory disease per additional pregnancy (left) and induced abortion (right) by baseline characteristics. Adjustments are as in Table 2. Each square has an area inversely proportional to the standard error of the log risk. The diamond indicates the overall risk of circulatory disease per additional pregnancy and induced abortion and its 95% CI. Analyses for pregnancy and induced abortion, respectively, are among women with at least one pregnancy or at least one induced abortion

Miscarriage and CVD risks

Compared to women who had never had a miscarriage, women who had a history of miscarriage had an adjusted HR of 1.04 (1.01; 1.07) for circulatory disease. The adjusted HRs of circulatory disease associated with number of miscarriages were 1.01 (0.98; 1.05) for one, 1.12 (1.05; 1.21) for two, and 1.12 (0.99; 1.26) for three or more miscarriages (Table 2 and Additional file 1: Figure S1). The HR of circulatory disease for each additional miscarriage was 1.04 (1.00; 1.09), with little evidence of differences between subgroups of populations (Fig. 3). The strength of the association between miscarriage and risk of CHD and stroke was similar in direction, yet stronger in magnitude for CHD compared to that for stroke and total circulatory disease (Table 2 and Additional file 1: Figure S2). The HRs for CHD and stroke per additional miscarriage were 1.07 (1.01; 1.14) and 1.04 (0.98; 1.10), respectively, and were broadly consistent across different subgroups (Additional file 1: Figure S4). Analyses by stroke subtype showed that the association was predominantly driven by a higher risk of haemorrhagic, but not of ischaemic, stroke (Additional file 1: Table S5).
Fig. 3

Adjusted hazard ratios for incident circulatory disease per additional miscarriage (left) and stillbirth (right) by baseline characteristics. Adjustments are as in Table 2. Each square has an area inversely proportional to the standard error of the log risk. The diamond indicates the overall risk of circulatory disease per additional miscarriage and stillbirth and its 95% CI. Analyses for miscarriage and stillbirth, respectively, are among women with at least one miscarriage or at least one stillbirth

Adjusted hazard ratios for incident circulatory disease per additional miscarriage (left) and stillbirth (right) by baseline characteristics. Adjustments are as in Table 2. Each square has an area inversely proportional to the standard error of the log risk. The diamond indicates the overall risk of circulatory disease per additional miscarriage and stillbirth and its 95% CI. Analyses for miscarriage and stillbirth, respectively, are among women with at least one miscarriage or at least one stillbirth

Induced abortion and CVD risks

Compared to women who had never had an induced abortion, women with a history of induced abortion had an adjusted HR of 1.04 (1.02; 1.07) for circulatory disease. There was a log-linear association between the number of induced abortions and the risk of circulatory disease; the HRs were 1.04 (1.02; 1.06) for one, 1.05 (1.02; 1.07) for two, and 1.09 (1.05; 1.13) for three or more induced abortions (Table 2 and Additional file 1: Figure S1). Corresponding HRs for CHD were 1.08 (1.05; 1.11), 1.13 (1.08; 1.18), and 1.14 (1.07; 1.21), while for stroke they were 1.04 (1.01; 1.06), 1.05 (1.01; 1.09), and 1.09 (1.04; 1.15). Adjusted HRs for each additional induced abortion were 1.02 (1.01; 1.04) for circulatory disease, 1.02 (1.00; 1.05) for CHD, and 1.03 (1.00; 1.05) for stroke, with little heterogeneity across different population subgroups (Fig. 3 and Additional file 1: Figure S5). Analyses by stroke subtype yielded similar findings for ischaemic stroke, but no associations were found for haemorrhagic stroke (Additional file 1: Table S5).

Stillbirth and CVD risks

A history of stillbirth was associated with a higher risk of circulatory disease (1.07, 1.03; 1.11) and stroke (1.06, 1.00; 1.12), yet there was no apparent association with CHD (1.00, 0.94; 1.07) (Table 2). The HR for circulatory disease associated with the number of stillbirths was 1.05 (1.01; 1.09) for one, 1.12 (1.04; 1.21) for two, and 1.13 (1.01; 1.28) for three or more stillbirths (Table 2 and Additional file 1: Figure S1). The corresponding HRs for CHD were 0.96 (0.90; 1.02), 1.07 (0.94; 1.22), and 1.29 (1.08; 1.54) (Table 2 and Additional file 1: Figure S2). There was no clear dose-response association between the number of stillbirths and stroke (Table 2 and Fig. 1). The HRs associated with each additional stillbirth were 1.04 (1.00; 1.08) for circulatory disease, 1.13 (1.06; 1.20) for CHD, and 1.02 (0.96; 1.08) for stroke. Analyses by stroke subtype yielded broadly similar patterns for ischaemic stroke but somewhat stronger associations for haemorrhagic stroke (Additional file 1: Table S5). There were no material differences across population subgroups in the association between each additional stillbirth and the risk of circulatory disease, CHD, or stroke (Fig. 3 and Additional file 1: Figure S6). Analyses stratified by age at risk and study area only yielded similar results compared to those from the main analyses for all comparisons (Additional file 1: Tables S5 and S6).

Discussion

This large study of almost 300,000 women in China provides a comprehensive assessment of the relationships of pregnancy, pregnancy loss, and CVD incidence in later life. There was a J-shaped relationship between the number of pregnancies and CVD, with women who had never been pregnant or with multiple pregnancies being at a higher risk of CVD, compared with those who had been pregnant once. Furthermore, a history of miscarriage, induced abortion, and stillbirth each were associated with a higher risk of CVD. Although the strength of the relationships varied between types of pregnancy loss, the relationships generally became stronger with recurrent pregnancy loss. These results were not accounted for by adjustment for a range of potential confounders, and they were broadly consistent across major demographic and clinical subpopulations. Previous studies of mostly Western populations have provided inconclusive evidence on the association between pregnancy loss and CVD risk, which may in part be limited by retrospective design, small study sizes, different exposure definitions, and varied levels of adjustment [11–13, 17–19]. A meta-analysis of ten cohort and case-control studies reported that women with a history of miscarriage are at a 45% higher risk of CHD, compared to women who have not experienced miscarriage; recurrent miscarriage was associated with a twofold risk of CHD [10]. No association was found between a history of miscarriage and future stroke. A large-scale population-based study among more than one million women in Denmark found that a history of miscarriage was associated with an about 15% higher risk of myocardial infarction and stroke, and the associations were stronger in women with repeated miscarriages [13]. Moreover, a study among 60,105 women in Scotland reported that miscarriage, but only when consecutive, was associated with a higher risk of CHD but not of stroke; HRs for CHD were 1.75 for two and 3.18 for three or more consecutive miscarriages, respectively [20]. This study concurs with previous findings and shows reliably that the risk of circulatory disease, CHD, and stroke is higher with increasing number of miscarriages. Prospective evidence on the relevance of stillbirth for the long-term risk of CVD outcomes is scarce. However, studies generally direct towards a positive relationship [12, 13, 19, 20], particularly for CHD, with adjusted HRs for CHD ranging from 1.25 among 78,000 women in the Women's Health Initiative [19] to 3.5 among 11,500 women from the EPIC-Heidelberg cohort [12]. The only study so far in a Chinese population found no evidence of a relationship between the number of miscarriages or stillbirths and the risk of coronary or stroke death, although the small number of events limited reliable assessments of these relationships [11]. The present study included a much larger number of well-characterised incident CVD events than any of these previous studies, and hence considerably expands previous findings by providing a detailed picture of the relevance of miscarriage and stillbirth on the risk of CVD in a contemporary population of Chinese women. Miscarriage and stillbirth may be aetiologically linked to CVD through an underlying vascular pathology, particularly endothelial dysfunction, that could contribute to poor placental function during pregnancy, resulting in pregnancy loss and a higher risk of CVD [21, 22]. Indeed, a previous small-scale study reported that women with a history of recurrent pregnancy loss had more severe endothelial dysfunction compared to women who experienced uncomplicated pregnancies [22]. Autoimmune disorders, including the antiphospholipid syndrome and systemic lupus erythematosus [23, 24], are commonly implicated in the occurrence of miscarriage and stillbirth. Hence, it may be that systemic inflammatory processes associated with autoimmune conditions and the progression of atherosclerosis lead to endothelial dysfunction and, in turn, increase the risk of both pregnancy loss and CVD [25]. A genetic predisposition might be involved, as parents of women who experienced recurrent miscarriage are more likely to experience CHD compared to parents of women without such a history [26]. Factor V Leiden or prothrombin gene mutations considerably increase the risk of abnormal placentation and recurrent miscarriage, and may predispose carriers to thrombotic disease in later life [27, 28]. Research on the health sequelae of induced abortion has primarily focussed on the risks of adverse obstetric or perinatal outcomes in subsequent pregnancies. For example, induced abortion might increase the risk of low birth weight and preterm birth [29], which has been linked to maternal CVD risk in later life in several studies [30, 31], even after accounting for socioeconomic factors, smoking, and pregnancy-related complications [32]. Conversely, a history of induced abortion has been associated with a lower risk of preeclampsia in subsequent pregnancies [33, 34], which is in accordance with the protective effects of a previous birth on preeclampsia risk in later pregnancies [35, 36], but at odds with the higher risk of cardiometabolic outcomes seen among women with a history of preeclampsia [37]. We report a graded relationship between the number of induced abortions and risk of CVD outcomes, which is in contrast with findings from previous studies that found no evidence for such a relationship [11, 12]. The present study has a number of strengths, including a large sample size, prospective design, and ability to adjust for a range of potential confounders. The generalisability of our findings was enhanced by the inclusion of women from ten diverse areas in China. While our findings were robust and consistent in a comprehensive series of analyses, the effect sizes of some estimates were small and may be subject to unmeasured or residual confounding, particularly those related to physiological, cultural, or socioeconomic factors underlying the number of pregnancies and pregnancy losses. Future Mendelian randomisation studies might help to assess the causality of our findings. Furthermore, pregnancies and pregnancy losses were self-reported and, for some women, solicited several years after their reproductive age. For example, miscarriages early in pregnancy are often silent and may have been underreported. This could have led to measurement error, which, if random, would have underestimated the true strengths of the observed associations. Data on the sequence and spacing of pregnancies and pregnancy losses across the reproductive life span were not available. Nevertheless, analyses adjusted for the total number of pregnancies and pregnancy losses throughout the reproductive lifespan or restricted to women who had reported exclusively on one type of pregnancy loss yielded virtually identical results, as in previous studies [20]. Finally, our study did not collect data on CVD risk factors either before or during pregnancy that might determine pregnancy loss as well as future CVD risk. For example, women with pre-existing or pregnancy-induced conditions such as type 1 diabetes, gestational diabetes, gestational obesity, preeclampsia, or polycystic ovary syndrome might be more likely to experience pregnancy loss than women without these risk factors.

Conclusions

In conclusion, increases in pregnancy, and a history and recurrence of miscarriage, induced abortion, and stillbirth are each associated with a higher risk of CVD outcomes in Chinese women. Further studies are needed to elucidate the physiological, behavioural, and socioeconomic factors involved. If causal, more frequent screening and timely intervention might help to delay or prevent the onset of CVD among women with large numbers of pregnancies or recurrent pregnancy loss.
  37 in total

1.  Risk of cardiovascular disease among postmenopausal women with prior pregnancy loss: the women's health initiative.

Authors:  Donna R Parker; Bing Lu; Megan Sands-Lincoln; Candyce H Kroenke; Cathy C Lee; Mary O'Sullivan; Hannah L Park; Nisha Parikh; Robert S Schenken; Charles B Eaton
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 5.166

2.  Abortion and its effect on risk of preeclampsia and transient hypertension.

Authors:  J L Eras; A F Saftlas; E Triche; C D Hsu; H A Risch; M B Bracken
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.822

Review 3.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of pregnancy outcomes in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and lupus nephritis.

Authors:  Andrew Smyth; Guilherme H M Oliveira; Brian D Lahr; Kent R Bailey; Suzanne M Norby; Vesna D Garovic
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 8.237

4.  Pregnancy loss and risk of cardiovascular disease: a prospective population-based cohort study (EPIC-Heidelberg).

Authors:  Elham Kharazmi; Laure Dossus; Sabine Rohrmann; Rudolf Kaaks
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 5.994

5.  Is normal pregnancy atherogenic?

Authors:  U Martin; C Davies; S Hayavi; A Hartland; F Dunne
Journal:  Clin Sci (Lond)       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 6.124

6.  Reproductive history and mortality from cardiovascular disease among women textile workers in Shanghai, China.

Authors:  Lisa G Gallagher; Lora B Davis; Roberta M Ray; Bruce M Psaty; Dao Li Gao; Harvey Checkoway; David B Thomas
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2011-10-03       Impact factor: 7.196

7.  Pregnancy loss and later risk of atherosclerotic disease.

Authors:  Mattis Flyvholm Ranthe; Elisabeth A Wreford Andersen; Jan Wohlfahrt; Henning Bundgaard; Mads Melbye; Heather A Boyd
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Long term effects of childbearing on health.

Authors:  V Beral
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 3.710

Review 9.  Cardiovascular disease risk in women with pre-eclampsia: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Morven Caroline Brown; Kate Elizabeth Best; Mark Stephen Pearce; Jason Waugh; Stephen Courtenay Robson; Ruth Bell
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2013-02-09       Impact factor: 8.082

10.  Temporal trends of main reproductive characteristics in ten urban and rural regions of China: the China Kadoorie biobank study of 300 000 women.

Authors:  Sarah Lewington; LiMing Li; Serini Murugasen; Lai-san Hong; Ling Yang; Yu Guo; Zheng Bian; Rory Collins; Junshi Chen; Hui He; Ming Wu; Tianyou He; Xiaolan Ren; Jinhuai Meng; Richard Peto; Zhengming Chen
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 7.196

View more
  10 in total

1.  Infertility, recurrent pregnancy loss, and risk of stroke: pooled analysis of individual patient data of 618 851 women.

Authors:  Chen Liang; Hsin-Fang Chung; Annette J Dobson; Kunihiko Hayashi; Yvonne T van der Schouw; Diana Kuh; Rebecca Hardy; Carol A Derby; Samar R El Khoudary; Imke Janssen; Sven Sandin; Elisabete Weiderpass; Gita D Mishra
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2022-06-22

2.  Pregnancy loss and risk of cardiovascular disease: the Nurses' Health Study II.

Authors:  Yi-Xin Wang; Lidia Mínguez-Alarcón; Audrey J Gaskins; Liang Wang; Ming Ding; Stacey A Missmer; Janet W Rich-Edwards; JoAnn E Manson; Jorge E Chavarro
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 35.855

3.  Number of parity is associated with low-grade albuminuria in middle-aged and elderly Chinese women.

Authors:  Kan Sun; Diaozhu Lin; Feng Qiling; Feng Li; Yiqin Qi; Wanting Feng; Meng Ren; Li Yan; Dan Liu
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2019-10-07       Impact factor: 2.809

4.  Pregnancy, pregnancy loss and the risk of diabetes in Chinese women: findings from the China Kadoorie Biobank.

Authors:  Sanne A E Peters; Ling Yang; Yu Guo; Yiping Chen; Zheng Bian; Huarong Sun; Yanjie Li; Liming Li; Mark Woodward; Zhengming Chen
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 8.082

5.  Maternal reproductive history and premenopausal risk of hypertension and cardiovascular disease: a Danish cohort study.

Authors:  Shannon X Chen; Kathleen M Rasmussen; Julia Finkelstein; H Støvring; Ellen Aa Nøhr; Helene Kirkegaard
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-11-04       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  The Efficacy of the Yasmin[Ethinylestradiol-Drospirenone (0.03/3 mg)] Treatment for Postoperative Abortion: A Protocol of Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Tian Tian; Huiyan Feng; Xiaoqian Liao; Qiling Su; Yunhui Li; Xiaomao Li
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-04-15

7.  Pregnancy loss and subsequent risk of prediabetes, diabetes and metabolic syndrome in couples: Tehran lipid and glucose study.

Authors:  Maryam Rahmati; Marzieh Saei Ghare Naz; Fereidoun Azizi; Fahimeh Ramezani Tehrani
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 8.440

8.  Early or late pregnancy loss and development of clinical cardiovascular disease risk factors: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  J Horn; L J Tanz; J J Stuart; A R Markovitz; G Skurnik; E B Rimm; S A Missmer; J W Rich-Edwards
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2018-09-23       Impact factor: 6.531

9.  Phenome-Wide Analysis of Short- and Long-Run Disease Incidence Following Recurrent Pregnancy Loss Using Data From a 39-Year Period.

Authors:  David Westergaard; Anna Pors Nielsen; Laust Hvas Mortensen; Henriette Svarre Nielsen; Søren Brunak
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2020-04-17       Impact factor: 5.501

10.  Effects of multiparity on left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in women: cross-sectional study of the KoRean wOmen'S chest pain rEgistry (KoROSE).

Authors:  Hyun-Jin Kim; Myung-A Kim; Hack-Lyoung Kim; Wan Joo Shim; Seong Mi Park; Mina Kim; Hyun Ju Yoon; Mi Seung Shin; Kyung-Soon Hong; Gil Ja Shin; Yong-Hyun Kim; Jin Oh Na; Jin-Ok Jeong
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-12-27       Impact factor: 2.692

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.