Literature DB >> 28782086

Investigation of different ethylenediamine-N,N'-disuccinic acid-enhanced washing configurations for remediation of a Cu-contaminated soil: process kinetics and efficiency comparison between single-stage and multi-stage configurations.

Alberto Ferraro1,2,3, Massimiliano Fabbricino4, Eric D van Hullebusch5,6, Giovanni Esposito7.   

Abstract

A comparison of Cu extraction yields for three different ethylenediamine-N,N'-disuccinic acid (EDDS)-enhanced washing configurations was performed on a Cu-contaminated soil. Batch experiments were used to simulate a single-stage continuous stirred tank reactor (CSTR) and a multi-stage (side feeding and counter-current) reactor. Single-stage CSTR conditions were simulated for various EDDS:(Cu + Cd + Pb + Co + Ni + Zn) molar ratio (EDDS:M ratio) (from 1 to 30) and liquid to soil (L/S) ratio (from 15 to 45). The highest Cu extraction yield (≃56%) was achieved with EDDS:M = 30. In contrast, a Cu extraction yield decrease was observed with increasing L/S ratio with highest extracted Cu achievement (≃48%) for L/S = 15. Side feeding configuration was tested in four experimental conditions through different fractionation mode of EDDS dose and treatment time at each washing step. Results from the four tests showed all enhanced Cu extraction (maximum values from ≃43 to ≃51%) achieved at lower treatment time and lower EDDS:M molar ratio compared to CSTR configuration with L/S = 25 and EDDS:M = 10. The counter-current washing was carried out through two washing flows achieving a process performance enhancement with 27% increase of extracted Cu compared to single-stage CSTR configuration. Higher Cu extraction percentage (36.8%) was observed in the first washing phase than in the second one (24.7%).

Entities:  

Keywords:  CSTR configuration; Counter-current configuration; Cu extraction yield; EDDS-enhanced soil washing; Multi-step washing; Side feeding configuration

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28782086     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-017-9844-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  26 in total

1.  Metal associations in soils before and after EDTA extractive decontamination: implications for the effectiveness of further clean-up procedures.

Authors:  A Barona; I Aranguiz; A Elías
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 8.071

2.  Electrochemical separation and reuse of EDTA after extraction of Cu contaminated soil.

Authors:  David Voglar; Domen Lestan
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2010-04-09       Impact factor: 10.588

3.  Process evaluation for optimization of EDTA use and recovery for heavy metal removal from a contaminated soil.

Authors:  Teik-Thye Lim; Peng-Cheong Chui; Kok-Hui Goh
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 7.086

4.  Influence of EDDS on metal speciation in soil extracts: measurement and mechanistic multicomponent modeling.

Authors:  Gerwin F Koopmans; Walter D C Schenkeveld; Jing Song; Yongming Luo; Jan Japenga; Erwin J M Temminghoff
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2008-02-15       Impact factor: 9.028

5.  Recovery of EDTA and metal precipitation from soil flushing solutions.

Authors:  L Di Palma; P Ferrantelli; C Merli; F Biancifiori
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2003-10-01       Impact factor: 10.588

6.  Chelant-aided enhancement of lead mobilization in residential soils.

Authors:  Dibyendu Sarkar; Syam S Andra; Sumathi K M Saminathan; Rupali Datta
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2008-05-13       Impact factor: 8.071

7.  Factors affecting EDTA extraction of lead from lead-contaminated soils.

Authors:  Chulsung Kim; Yongwoo Lee; Say Kee Ong
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 7.086

8.  Extraction of heavy metals from soils using biodegradable chelating agents.

Authors:  Susan Tandy; Karin Bossart; Roland Mueller; Jens Ritschel; Lukas Hauser; Rainer Schulin; Bernd Nowack
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2004-02-01       Impact factor: 9.028

9.  The study of operating variables in soil washing with EDTA.

Authors:  Zeli Zou; Rongliang Qiu; Weihua Zhang; Hanying Dong; Zhihao Zhao; Tao Zhang; Xiange Wei; Xinde Cai
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2008-09-06       Impact factor: 8.071

10.  Pressure-assisted chelation extraction of lead from contaminated soil.

Authors:  P K Andy Hong; Xiaoxiao Cai; Zhixiong Cha
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 8.071

View more
  5 in total

1.  Ethylenediamine-N,N'-Disuccinic Acid (EDDS)-Enhanced Flushing Optimization for Contaminated Agricultural Soil Remediation and Assessment of Prospective Cu and Zn Transport.

Authors:  Marco Race; Alberto Ferraro; Massimiliano Fabbricino; Agostino La Marca; Antonio Panico; Danilo Spasiano; Alice Tognacchini; Francesco Pirozzi
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-03-18       Impact factor: 3.390

2.  Data of OECD soil and leachate resulting from irrigation with aqueous solution containing trace metals at increasing sodium concentration.

Authors:  Ludovico Pontoni; Marco Race; Eric D van Hullebusch; Massimiliano Fabbricino; Giovanni Esposito; Francesco Pirozzi
Journal:  Data Brief       Date:  2019-07-17

3.  Suitability of environmental indices in assessment of soil remediation with conventional and next generation washing agents.

Authors:  Barbara K Klik; Zygmunt M Gusiatin; Dorota Kulikowska
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 4.  Port Sediments: Problem or Resource? A Review Concerning the Treatment and Decontamination of Port Sediments by Fungi and Bacteria.

Authors:  Grazia Cecchi; Laura Cutroneo; Simone Di Piazza; Giovanni Besio; Marco Capello; Mirca Zotti
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2021-06-11

5.  Sorption Mechanism and Optimization Study for the Bioremediation of Pb(II) and Cd(II) Contamination by Two Novel Isolated Strains Q3 and Q5 of Bacillus sp.

Authors:  Parviz Heidari; Antonio Panico
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-06-06       Impact factor: 3.390

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.