Literature DB >> 12697174

Factors affecting EDTA extraction of lead from lead-contaminated soils.

Chulsung Kim1, Yongwoo Lee, Say Kee Ong.   

Abstract

The effects of solution:soil ratio, major cations present in soils, and the ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA):lead stoichiometric ratio on the extraction of lead using EDTA were studied for three different Superfund site soils, one rifle range soil, and one artificially lead-contaminated soil. Extraction of lead from the lead-contaminated soils was not affected by a solution:soil ratio as low as 3:1 but instead was dependent on the quantity of EDTA present. Results of the experiments showed that the extraction efficiencies were different for each soil. If sufficiently large amount of EDTA was applied (EDTA-Pb stoichiometric ratio greater than 10), most of the lead were extracted for all soils tested except for a Superfund site soil from a lead mining area. The differences in extraction efficiencies may be due to the major cations present in soils which may compete with lead for active sites on EDTA. For example, iron ions most probably competed strongly with lead for EDTA ligand sites for pH less than 6. In addition, copper and zinc may potentially compete with lead for EDTA ligand sites. Experimental results showed that addition of EDTA to the soil resulted in a very large increase in metals solubility. The total molar concentrations of major cations extracted were as much as 20 times the added molar concentration of EDTA. For some of the soils tested, lead may have been occluded in the iron oxides present in the soil which may affect lead extraction. While major cations present in the soil may be one of the factors affecting lead extraction efficiency, the type of lead species present also play a role.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12697174     DOI: 10.1016/S0045-6535(03)00155-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chemosphere        ISSN: 0045-6535            Impact factor:   7.086


  9 in total

1.  Enhanced electrokinetic remediation of lead-contaminated soil by complexing agents and approaching anodes.

Authors:  Tao Zhang; Hua Zou; Minhui Ji; Xiaolin Li; Liqiao Li; Tang Tang
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Bioaccessibility and radioisotopes of lead in soils around a fertilizer industry in Lebanon.

Authors:  Dany Saba; Nastaran Manouchehri; Stephane Besançon; Omar El Samad; Rana Baydoun; Rola Bou Khozam; Lina Nafeh Kassir; Amine Kassouf; Hanna Chebib; Naim Ouaini; Philippe Cambier
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2019-06-04       Impact factor: 4.609

3.  Investigation of different ethylenediamine-N,N'-disuccinic acid-enhanced washing configurations for remediation of a Cu-contaminated soil: process kinetics and efficiency comparison between single-stage and multi-stage configurations.

Authors:  Alberto Ferraro; Massimiliano Fabbricino; Eric D van Hullebusch; Giovanni Esposito
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Effect of EDTA, EDDS, NTA and citric acid on electrokinetic remediation of As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Ni, Pb and Zn contaminated dredged marine sediment.

Authors:  Yue Song; Mohamed-Tahar Ammami; Ahmed Benamar; Salim Mezazigh; Huaqing Wang
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Selective leaching of lead from lead smelter residues using EDTA.

Authors:  Thupten Palden; Lieven Machiels; Bieke Onghena; Mercedes Regadío; Koen Binnemans
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 4.036

6.  Leaching variations of heavy metals in chelator-assisted phytoextraction by Zea mays L. exposed to acid rainfall.

Authors:  Yayin Lu; Dinggui Luo; Lirong Liu; Zicong Tan; An Lai; Guowei Liu; Junhui Li; Jianyou Long; Xuexia Huang; Yongheng Chen
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-09-11       Impact factor: 4.223

7.  Plant response to lead in the presence or absence EDTA in two sunflower genotypes (cultivated H. annuus cv. 1114 and interspecific line H. annuus × H. argophyllus).

Authors:  Snezhana Doncheva; Michael Moustakas; Kalina Ananieva; Martina Chavdarova; Emiliya Gesheva; Rumyana Vassilevska; Plamen Mateev
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 4.223

8.  Mobilization of heavy metals from contaminated paddy soil by EDDS, EDTA, and elemental sulfur.

Authors:  Guoqing Wang; Gerwin F Koopmans; Jing Song; Erwin J M Temminghoff; Yongming Luo; Qiguo Zhao; Jan Japenga
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2007-04-13       Impact factor: 4.898

9.  Removal of Chromium from a Contaminated Soil Using Oxalic Acid, Citric Acid, and Hydrochloric Acid: Dynamics, Mechanisms, and Concomitant Removal of Non-Targeted Metals.

Authors:  Yuhuan Sun; Feng Guan; Weiwei Yang; And Fayuan Wang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-08-02       Impact factor: 3.390

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.