| Literature DB >> 28781978 |
Drew A Lansdown1, Sonia Lee2, Craig Sam2, Roland Krug2, Brian T Feeley1, C Benjamin Ma1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Current evaluation of muscle fatty infiltration has been limited by subjective classifications. Quantitative fat evaluation through magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may allow for an improved longitudinal evaluation of the effect of surgical repair on the progression of fatty infiltration. HYPOTHESES: We hypothesized that (1) patients with isolated full-thickness supraspinatus tendon tears would have less progression in fatty infiltration compared with patients with full-thickness tears of multiple tendons and (2) patients with eventual failed repair would have higher baseline levels of fatty infiltration. STUDYEntities:
Keywords: fatty infiltration; quantitative imaging; rotator cuff tears
Year: 2017 PMID: 28781978 PMCID: PMC5521346 DOI: 10.1177/2325967117718537
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Orthop J Sports Med ISSN: 2325-9671
Figure 1.Sagittal magnetic resonance images are shown for a study patient (A, B) before surgery and (C, D) 6 months after rotator cuff repair. Proton density–weighted images are shown in A and C, while IDEAL (iterative decomposition of echoes of asymmetric length) images are presented in B and D. The supraspinatus fat fraction increased from 8.00% at baseline to 9.46% after surgical repair. An example region of interest for the supraspinatus is drawn in A. All muscles were segmented on 4 consecutive slices.
Overall Demographics
| Mean (SD) | |
|---|---|
| Age, y | 61.5 (10.5) |
| Body mass index, kg/m2 | 26.2 (5.1) |
| Tear size, mm | 21.7 (13.5) |
| Retraction, mm | 14.6 (14.4) |
| Time from baseline imaging to surgery, d | 55.5 (75.0) |
| Time to follow-up imaging, d | 189.0 (24.3) |
| n (%) | |
| Sex | |
| Female | 17 (48.6) |
| Male | 18 (51.4) |
| Tendons involved | |
| Isolated tears | |
| Supraspinatus | 19 (54.3) |
| Subscapularis | 1 (2.9) |
| Multitendon tears | |
|
| 10 (28.6) |
|
| 4 (11.4) |
|
| 1 (2.9) |
| Repair status at 6 months | |
| Intact repair | 26 (74.3) |
| Failed repair | 9 (25.7) |
Demographic Comparisons Between Isolated Supraspinatus and Multitendon Tears
| Isolated Supraspinatus Tears (n = 19), Mean (SD) | Multitendon Tears (n = 15), Mean (SD) |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, y | 59.2 (12.5) | 64.7 (6.7) | .13 |
| Body mass index, kg/m2 | 26.9 (5.8) | 25.3 (4.2) | .40 |
| Tear size, mm | 13.3 (6.9) | 32.4 (12.8) | <.0001 |
| Retraction, mm | 8.6 (8.2) | 23.1 (16.7) | .0024 |
| Time from baseline imaging to surgery, d | 62.1 (87.6) | 46.7 (55.8) | .56 |
| Time to follow-up imaging, d | 195.4 (26.9) | 183.3 (17.9) | .14 |
| Isolated Supraspinatus Tears (n = 19), n (%) | Multitendon Tears (n = 15), n (%) |
| |
| Sex | |||
| Female | 10 (29.4) | 7 (20.6) | |
| Male | 9 (26.5) | 8 (23.5) | .50 |
Demographic Comparisons Between Intact Repairs and Magnetic Resonance Imaging–Diagnosed Failures at 6 Months
| Intact Repair (n = 26), Mean (SD) | Failed Repair (n = 9), Mean (SD) |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, y | 60.5 (10.6) | 64.2 (10.1) | .37 |
| Body mass index, kg/m2 | 25.9 (5.5) | 27.1 (3.6) | .54 |
| Tear size, mm | 18.8 (12.9) | 30 (12.6) | .030 |
| Retraction, mm | 11.7 (13.5) | 22.9 (14.6) | .043 |
| Time from baseline imaging to surgery, d | 85.1 (121.2) | 45.3 (50.3) | .17 |
| Time to follow-up imaging, d | 188.4 (21.2) | 190.6 (33.1) | .82 |
| Intact Repair (n = 26), n (%) | Failed Repair (n = 9), n (%) |
| |
| Sex | |||
| Female | 15 (42.9) | 2 (5.7) | |
| Male | 11 (31.4) | 7 (20.0) | .073 |
Figure 2.The overall fat fractions for all patients at baseline and at 6 months after surgical repair. There was a significant increase in the fat fraction for the supraspinatus (*P = .025) and infraspinatus (**P = .027).
Figure 3.The supraspinatus fat fraction for isolated supraspinatus tears (n = 19) showed a significant increase from baseline to follow-up (*P = .0083). No significant differences were observed in the other muscles, though a trend towards a significant increase was seen in the infraspinatus fat fraction (**P = .074).
Figure 4.The fat fractions for multitendon tears are displayed for all rotator cuff muscles. There were no statistically significant differences between baseline and follow-up values.
Figure 5.The supraspinatus fat fraction was significantly higher at baseline for patients with an eventual repair failure relative to patients with an intact repair at 6 months (*P = .037). No statistical differences were noted for the other 3 muscles.