| Literature DB >> 28781391 |
N Rastak1, A Pajunoja2, J C Acosta Navarro1, J Ma3, M Song4,5, D G Partridge1, A Kirkevåg6, Y Leong2,7, W W Hu8,9, N F Taylor10, A Lambe11,12, K Cerully13, A Bougiatioti14,15, P Liu16, R Krejci1, T Petäjä17, C Percival18, P Davidovits12, D R Worsnop11, A M L Ekman19, A Nenes13,14,15,20, S Martin12, J L Jimenez8,9, D R Collins10, D O Topping18,21, A K Bertram5, A Zuend3, A Virtanen2, I Riipinen1.
Abstract
A large fraction of atmospheric organic aerosol (OA) originates from natural emissions that are oxidized in the atmosphere to form secondary organic aerosol (SOA). Isoprene (IP) and monoterpenes (MT) are the most important precursors of SOA originating from forests. The climate impacts from OA are currently estimated through parameterizations of water uptake that drastically simplify the complexity of OA. We combine laboratory experiments, thermodynamic modeling, field observations, and climate modeling to (1) explain the molecular mechanisms behind RH-dependent SOA water-uptake with solubility and phase separation; (2) show that laboratory data on IP- and MT-SOA hygroscopicity are representative of ambient data with corresponding OA source profiles; and (3) demonstrate the sensitivity of the modeled aerosol climate effect to assumed OA water affinity. We conclude that the commonly used single-parameter hygroscopicity framework can introduce significant error when quantifying the climate effects of organic aerosol. The results highlight the need for better constraints on the overall global OA mass loadings and its molecular composition, including currently underexplored anthropogenic and marine OA sources.Entities:
Keywords: aerosol‐climate interactions; aerosol‐water interactions; atmospheric aerosol; hygroscopicity; secondary organic aerosol
Year: 2017 PMID: 28781391 PMCID: PMC5518298 DOI: 10.1002/2017GL073056
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Geophys Res Lett ISSN: 0094-8276 Impact factor: 4.720
Figure 1Optical images of micrometer scale SOA particles with increasing relative humidity. (a) Isoprene‐derived SOA for mass concentrations of 70–80 μg m−3 and (b) α‐pinene‐derived SOA for a mass concentration of 110 μg m−3 [Figure 1a is from the current study while Figure 1b was reproduced from Renbaum‐Wolff et al., 2016]. Note that the light gray circles at the center of the particles are due to an optical effect caused by the hemispherical shape of the particles deposited on a substrate. Illustrations are shown below the images for clarity. Green: organic‐rich phase. Blue: water‐rich phase. The scale bar represents 20 μm.
Figure 2The RH dependencies of the effective hygroscopicity parameter κ OA,eff for isoprene‐ and monoterpene‐derived SOA. (a) The hygroscopicity parameter κ OA,eff for laboratory‐generated 100 nm particles from IP photooxidation [blue diamonds, O:C = 0.89; Pajunoja et al., 2015], organic aerosol sampled at the SOAS site in Alabama (red squares, O:C = 0.63 ± 0.06), and as predicted using two state‐of‐the‐art thermodynamic models (SPARC and AIOMFAC). The SPARC equilibrium calculations are presented for a case accounting for the solubility of the SOA components only (dashed lines) as well as a case including also treatment of adsorptive water uptake and nonideality of the aqueous phase. The AIOMFAC + EVAPORATION calculations account for mixture nonideality, a potential liquid‐liquid phase separation, coupled gas‐particle partitioning of semivolatile organic vapors and water, and a mass‐transfer correction for semisolid organic particles at low RH. (b) Same as Figure 2a but for MT ozonolysis SOA [red diamonds, O:C = 0.56; Pajunoja et al., 2015] and organic aerosol sampled at the SMEAR II station in Hyytiälä, Finland (blue squares, O:C = 0.63 ± 0.06). For details of the experiments and the model calculations, see SI.
Figure 3Sensitivities of two CMIP5 climate models to κ OA. (a) Difference in the top‐of‐the‐atmosphere (TOA) radiative flux in NorESM model simulations of the present‐day atmosphere (22 years simulated) for κ OA varying between 0.05 and 0.15 (see SI). (b) Difference in the top‐of‐the‐atmosphere radiative flux in the ECHAM6‐HAM2 model simulations (7 years simulated) of the present‐day atmosphere for κ OA varying between 0.05 and 0.15 (see SI). (c) TOA radiative flux difference for κ OA varying between 0.05 and 0.15 as a function of RH for NorESM (left axis, black symbols) and ECHAM (right axis, red symbols). Only grid points over land and outside of the polar regions have been considered. (d) The contribution of the direct versus indirect aerosol effects to the model sensitivity for NorESM (left axis, black symbols) and ECHAM (right axis, red symbols). Crosses refer to mean and dots to median values.