Literature DB >> 28781330

Prolonged Right Ventricular Ejection Delay in Brugada Syndrome Depends on the Type of SCN5A Variant - Electromechanical Coupling Through Tissue Velocity Imaging as a Bridge Between Genotyping and Phenotyping.

Sophie C H Van Malderen1,2,3, Dorien Daneels4, Dirk Kerkhove5, Uschi Peeters4, Dominic A M J Theuns3, Steven Droogmans5, Guy Van Camp5, Caroline Weytjens5, Martine Biervliet4, Maryse Bonduelle4, Sonia Van Dooren4, Pedro Brugada1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with Brugada syndrome (BrS) and a history of syncope or sustained ventricular arrhythmia have longer right ventricular ejection delays (RVEDs) than asymptomatic BrS patients. Different types ofSCN5Avariants leading to different reductions in sodium current (INa) may have different effects on conduction delay, and consequently on electromechanical coupling (i.e., RVED). Thus, we investigated the genotype-phenotype relationship by measuring RVED to establish whether BrS patients carrying more severeSCN5Avariants leading to premature protein truncation (T) and presumably 100%INareduction have a longer RVED than patients carrying missense variants (M) with different degrees ofINareduction.Methods and 
Results: There were 34 BrS patients (mean [±SD] age 43.3±12.9 years; 52.9% male) carrying anSCN5Avariant and 66 non-carriers in this cross-sectional study. Patients carrying aSCN5Avariant were divided into T-carriers (n=13) and M-carriers (n=21). Using tissue velocity imaging, RVED and left ventricular ejection delay (LVED) were measured as the time from QRS onset to the onset of the systolic ejection wave at the end of the isovolumetric contraction. T-carriers had longer RVEDs than M-carriers (139.3±15.1 vs. 124.8±11.9 ms, respectively; P=0.008) and non-carriers (127.7±17.3 ms, P=0.027). There were no differences in LVED among groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Using the simple, non-invasive echocardiographic parameter RVED revealed a more pronounced 'electromechanical' delay in BrS patients carrying T variants ofSCN5A.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Brugada syndrome; Conduction delay; Right ventricular ejection delay; SCN5A

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28781330     DOI: 10.1253/circj.CJ-16-1279

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ J        ISSN: 1346-9843            Impact factor:   2.993


  4 in total

1.  Deep Mutational Scan of an SCN5A Voltage Sensor.

Authors:  Andrew M Glazer; Brett M Kroncke; Kenneth A Matreyek; Tao Yang; Yuko Wada; Tiffany Shields; Joe-Elie Salem; Douglas M Fowler; Dan M Roden
Journal:  Circ Genom Precis Med       Date:  2020-01-12

2.  Case report: Synergetic effect of ischaemia and increased vagal tone inducing ventricular fibrillation in a patient with Brugada syndrome.

Authors:  Sophie C H Van Malderen; Carl J Schultz; Luc Jordaens
Journal:  Eur Heart J Case Rep       Date:  2020-07-30

3.  Right Ventricular Longitudinal Conduction Delay in Patients with Brugada Syndrome.

Authors:  Namsik Yoon; Hyung Ki Jeong; Ki Hong Lee; Hyung Wook Park; Jeong Gwan Cho
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 2.153

4.  Identification of SCN5a p.C335R Variant in a Large Family with Dilated Cardiomyopathy and Conduction Disease.

Authors:  Farbod Sedaghat-Hamedani; Sabine Rebs; Ibrahim El-Battrawy; Safak Chasan; Tobias Krause; Jan Haas; Rujia Zhong; Zhenxing Liao; Qiang Xu; Xiaobo Zhou; Ibrahim Akin; Edgar Zitron; Norbert Frey; Katrin Streckfuss-Bömeke; Elham Kayvanpour
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 5.923

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.