Literature DB >> 28780735

RNA folding kinetics using Monte Carlo and Gillespie algorithms.

Peter Clote1, Amir H Bayegan2.   

Abstract

RNA secondary structure folding kinetics is known to be important for the biological function of certain processes, such as the hok/sok system in E. coli. Although linear algebra provides an exact computational solution of secondary structure folding kinetics with respect to the Turner energy model for tiny ([Formula: see text]20 nt) RNA sequences, the folding kinetics for larger sequences can only be approximated by binning structures into macrostates in a coarse-grained model, or by repeatedly simulating secondary structure folding with either the Monte Carlo algorithm or the Gillespie algorithm. Here we investigate the relation between the Monte Carlo algorithm and the Gillespie algorithm. We prove that asymptotically, the expected time for a K-step trajectory of the Monte Carlo algorithm is equal to [Formula: see text] times that of the Gillespie algorithm, where [Formula: see text] denotes the Boltzmann expected network degree. If the network is regular (i.e. every node has the same degree), then the mean first passage time (MFPT) computed by the Monte Carlo algorithm is equal to MFPT computed by the Gillespie algorithm multiplied by [Formula: see text]; however, this is not true for non-regular networks. In particular, RNA secondary structure folding kinetics, as computed by the Monte Carlo algorithm, is not equal to the folding kinetics, as computed by the Gillespie algorithm, although the mean first passage times are roughly correlated. Simulation software for RNA secondary structure folding according to the Monte Carlo and Gillespie algorithms is publicly available, as is our software to compute the expected degree of the network of secondary structures of a given RNA sequence-see http://bioinformatics.bc.edu/clote/RNAexpNumNbors .

Entities:  

Keywords:  Expected network degree; Gillespie algorithm mean recurrence time; Mean first passage time; Metropolis algorithm; RNA secondary structure; Refolding kinetics

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28780735     DOI: 10.1007/s00285-017-1169-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Math Biol        ISSN: 0303-6812            Impact factor:   2.259


  45 in total

1.  Nucleic acid sequence design via efficient ensemble defect optimization.

Authors:  Joseph N Zadeh; Brian R Wolfe; Niles A Pierce
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2010-08-17       Impact factor: 3.376

2.  Understanding the kinetic mechanism of RNA single base pair formation.

Authors:  Xiaojun Xu; Tao Yu; Shi-Jie Chen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Simulating RNA folding kinetics on approximated energy landscapes.

Authors:  Xinyu Tang; Shawna Thomas; Lydia Tapia; David P Giedroc; Nancy M Amato
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2008-02-13       Impact factor: 5.469

4.  Constructing multi-resolution Markov State Models (MSMs) to elucidate RNA hairpin folding mechanisms.

Authors:  Xuhui Huang; Yuan Yao; Gregory R Bowman; Jian Sun; Leonidas J Guibas; Gunnar Carlsson; Vijay S Pande
Journal:  Pac Symp Biocomput       Date:  2010

5.  Assessing the reliability of RNA folding using statistical mechanics.

Authors:  M Huynen; R Gutell; D Konings
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1997-04-18       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 6.  Everything you wanted to know about Markov State Models but were afraid to ask.

Authors:  Vijay S Pande; Kyle Beauchamp; Gregory R Bowman
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2010-06-04       Impact factor: 3.608

7.  How does a protein fold?

Authors:  A Sali; E Shakhnovich; M Karplus
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1994-05-19       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Rfam 12.0: updates to the RNA families database.

Authors:  Eric P Nawrocki; Sarah W Burge; Alex Bateman; Jennifer Daub; Ruth Y Eberhardt; Sean R Eddy; Evan W Floden; Paul P Gardner; Thomas A Jones; John Tate; Robert D Finn
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2014-11-11       Impact factor: 19.160

9.  Efficient procedures for the numerical simulation of mid-size RNA kinetics.

Authors:  Iddo Aviram; Ilia Veltman; Alexander Churkin; Danny Barash
Journal:  Algorithms Mol Biol       Date:  2012-09-07       Impact factor: 1.405

10.  Using the fast fourier transform to accelerate the computational search for RNA conformational switches.

Authors:  Evan Senter; Saad Sheikh; Ivan Dotu; Yann Ponty; Peter Clote
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  G1/S transcription factors assemble in increasing numbers of discrete clusters through G1 phase.

Authors:  Labe Black; Sylvain Tollis; Guo Fu; Jean-Bernard Fiche; Savanna Dorsey; Jing Cheng; Ghada Ghazal; Stephen Notley; Benjamin Crevier; Jeremy Bigness; Marcelo Nollmann; Mike Tyers; Catherine Ann Royer
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2020-09-07       Impact factor: 10.539

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.