| Literature DB >> 28780706 |
Alberto Raggi1, Carlo Antozzi2, Fulvio Baggi2, Matilde Leonardi3, Lorenzo Maggi2, Renato Mantegazza2.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to report on the validity, reliability, and sensitivity of the myasthenia gravis activities of daily living profile (MG-ADL) in a sample of Italian patients. Patients with myasthenia gravis (MG) completed a protocol that included the MG-ADL, the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0), the Besta Neurological Institute rating scale for myasthenia gravis, and the MG-composite. Cronbach's alpha was used to test reliability, Spearman's correlation and intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) to test short-term test-retest, Kruskal-Wallis test to assess differences in MG-ADL between patients with different disease severity, and Wilcoxon signed-rank test to assess sensitivity to change. In total, 58 patients were enrolled: 44 were females, mean MG duration 10.5 ± 10.4 years, mean MG-ADL 3.98 ± 3.07. The MG-ADL showed good internal consistency (alpha = .774), stability (test-retest correlation = .98, ICC = .97). It was superior to the WHODAS 2.0 in differentiating patients with different MG type and severity (P < .001), it showed higher sensitivity to change (P = .001 for improved and P = .007 for worsened patients) and higher correlation with the MG-composite (RHO = .625). Our analysis shows that the Italian version of the MG-ADL is valid, reliable, stable, and sensitive to change.Entities:
Keywords: INCB-MG; MG-ADL; Myasthenia gravis; Reliability; Validity; WHODAS 2.0
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28780706 DOI: 10.1007/s10072-017-3083-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neurol Sci ISSN: 1590-1874 Impact factor: 3.307