PURPOSE: To develop a preliminary version of a disease-specific, patient-reported disability assessment instrument for myasthenia gravis (MG) based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF): the MG-DIS. METHODS: Five consecutive steps were taken: literature review and selection of outcome measures; linking of measures' concepts to ICF categories and selection of those reported by 30% of the instruments; comparison of linking results with a previous selection of MG-relevant ICF categories; patient interview; development of questions based on retained ICF categories. RESULTS: Thirty-one papers containing 21 different outcome measures were found: 13 ICF categories were linked to them. Fifty-five items were retained after the comparison with the list of MG-specific categories, and were used for patient interview. Thirteen interviews were conducted before saturation of data was reached and the final list was composed of 42 categories: based upon them, 44 questions were developed. CONCLUSIONS: The preliminary version of the MG-DIS contains more information than each single MG-specific tool, in particular, for the component of environmental factors. Further research is needed to test its psychometric properties. IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATION: It is important that patient-reported outcome is incorporated in MG patient's assessment. MG features can be evaluated with ICF-based methods. An MG-specific patient-reported disability assessment instrument can be used to monitor changes of functioning in patients on MG-specific treatments, and can be used in clinical trials as outcome measure.
PURPOSE: To develop a preliminary version of a disease-specific, patient-reported disability assessment instrument for myasthenia gravis (MG) based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF): the MG-DIS. METHODS: Five consecutive steps were taken: literature review and selection of outcome measures; linking of measures' concepts to ICF categories and selection of those reported by 30% of the instruments; comparison of linking results with a previous selection of MG-relevant ICF categories; patient interview; development of questions based on retained ICF categories. RESULTS: Thirty-one papers containing 21 different outcome measures were found: 13 ICF categories were linked to them. Fifty-five items were retained after the comparison with the list of MG-specific categories, and were used for patient interview. Thirteen interviews were conducted before saturation of data was reached and the final list was composed of 42 categories: based upon them, 44 questions were developed. CONCLUSIONS: The preliminary version of the MG-DIS contains more information than each single MG-specific tool, in particular, for the component of environmental factors. Further research is needed to test its psychometric properties. IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATION: It is important that patient-reported outcome is incorporated in MG patient's assessment. MG features can be evaluated with ICF-based methods. An MG-specific patient-reported disability assessment instrument can be used to monitor changes of functioning in patients on MG-specific treatments, and can be used in clinical trials as outcome measure.
Authors: Sophie Cleanthous; Ann-Christin Mork; Antoine Regnault; Stefan Cano; Henry J Kaminski; Thomas Morel Journal: Orphanet J Rare Dis Date: 2021-10-30 Impact factor: 4.123