Young Eun Moon1, Michael Y Lee2, Dong Hyun Kim3. 1. Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, College of Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, 222 Banpo-daero, Seocho-gu, Seoul, 137-701, Republic of Korea. anemoon@naver.com. 2. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Memorial Hospital, College of Medicine, The University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, USA. 3. Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, College of Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, 222 Banpo-daero, Seocho-gu, Seoul, 137-701, Republic of Korea.
Abstract
PURPOSE:Propofol causes injection pain. Although lidocaine pre-treatment via venous occlusion is known to be the most effective way, it still has some inconvenience. We implemented this study to compare the effect of a vapocoolant spray with lidocaine pre-treatment. METHODS:Participants (n = 90) were randomized to one of three groups. Group V: after placebo injection and tourniquet, the vapocoolant spray was applied; group L: after lidocaine injection and tourniquet, the placebo spray was applied; group C: after placebo injection and tourniquet, the placebo spray was applied. The intensity of propofol-induced pain, the incidence of metallic taste, and the satisfaction were assessed. RESULTS:Propofol-induced pain was significantly lower in groups V and L than in group C [0.5 (0-2.25), 0.5 (0-1), and 5 (1-7), median (interquartile range), respectively, p < 0.001]. There was no significant difference in pain intensity between groups V and L. Group L showed a significantly higher incidence of metallic taste than groups V and C (23, 0, and 0%, respectively; p = 0.001). Groups V and L showed higher satisfaction scores than group C [5 (4-5), 4 (3.75-5), and 2 (2-3), respectively; p < 0.001], and there was a significant difference between groups V and L (p = 0.012). CONCLUSION:Vapocoolant spray showed a similar effect to lidocaine in analgesia and lowered the incidence of a metallic taste. These resulted in greater satisfaction with the vapocoolant spray compared with lidocaine. Vapocoolant spray is an effective and convenient way to prevent propofol-induced pain.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE:Propofol causes injection pain. Although lidocaine pre-treatment via venous occlusion is known to be the most effective way, it still has some inconvenience. We implemented this study to compare the effect of a vapocoolant spray with lidocaine pre-treatment. METHODS:Participants (n = 90) were randomized to one of three groups. Group V: after placebo injection and tourniquet, the vapocoolant spray was applied; group L: after lidocaine injection and tourniquet, the placebo spray was applied; group C: after placebo injection and tourniquet, the placebo spray was applied. The intensity of propofol-induced pain, the incidence of metallic taste, and the satisfaction were assessed. RESULTS:Propofol-induced pain was significantly lower in groups V and L than in group C [0.5 (0-2.25), 0.5 (0-1), and 5 (1-7), median (interquartile range), respectively, p < 0.001]. There was no significant difference in pain intensity between groups V and L. Group L showed a significantly higher incidence of metallic taste than groups V and C (23, 0, and 0%, respectively; p = 0.001). Groups V and L showed higher satisfaction scores than group C [5 (4-5), 4 (3.75-5), and 2 (2-3), respectively; p < 0.001], and there was a significant difference between groups V and L (p = 0.012). CONCLUSION: Vapocoolant spray showed a similar effect to lidocaine in analgesia and lowered the incidence of a metallic taste. These resulted in greater satisfaction with the vapocoolant spray compared with lidocaine. Vapocoolant spray is an effective and convenient way to prevent propofol-induced pain.