BACKGROUND: The efficacy of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) surgery to produce weight loss has been well-documented, but few studies have measured the key components of energy balance, food intake, and energy expenditure longitudinally. METHODS: Male Sprague-Dawley rats on a high-fat diet underwent either RYGB, sham operation, or pair feeding and were compared to chow-fed lean controls. Body weight and composition, food intake and preference, energy expenditure, fecal output, and gastric emptying were monitored before and up to 4 months after intervention. RESULTS: Despite the recovery of initially decreased food intake to levels slightly higher than before surgery and comparable to sham-operated rats after about 1 month, RYGB rats maintained a lower level of body weight and fat mass for 4 months that was not different from chow-fed age-matched controls. Energy expenditure corrected for lean body mass at 1 and 4 months after RYGB was not different from presurgical levels and from all other groups. Fecal energy loss was significantly increased at 6 and 16 weeks after RYGB compared to sham operation, and there was a progressive decrease in fat preference after RYGB. CONCLUSIONS: In this rat model of RYGB, sustained weight loss is achieved by a combination of initial hypophagia and sustained increases in fecal energy loss, without change in energy expenditure per lean mass. A shift away from high-fat towards low-fat/high-carbohydrate food preference occurring in parallel suggests long-term adaptive mechanisms related to fat absorption.
BACKGROUND: The efficacy of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) surgery to produce weight loss has been well-documented, but few studies have measured the key components of energy balance, food intake, and energy expenditure longitudinally. METHODS: Male Sprague-Dawley rats on a high-fat diet underwent either RYGB, sham operation, or pair feeding and were compared to chow-fed lean controls. Body weight and composition, food intake and preference, energy expenditure, fecal output, and gastric emptying were monitored before and up to 4 months after intervention. RESULTS: Despite the recovery of initially decreased food intake to levels slightly higher than before surgery and comparable to sham-operated rats after about 1 month, RYGB rats maintained a lower level of body weight and fat mass for 4 months that was not different from chow-fed age-matched controls. Energy expenditure corrected for lean body mass at 1 and 4 months after RYGB was not different from presurgical levels and from all other groups. Fecal energy loss was significantly increased at 6 and 16 weeks after RYGB compared to sham operation, and there was a progressive decrease in fat preference after RYGB. CONCLUSIONS: In this rat model of RYGB, sustained weight loss is achieved by a combination of initial hypophagia and sustained increases in fecal energy loss, without change in energy expenditure per lean mass. A shift away from high-fat towards low-fat/high-carbohydrate food preference occurring in parallel suggests long-term adaptive mechanisms related to fat absorption.
Authors: E Bobbioni-Harsch; P Morel; O Huber; F Assimacopoulos-Jeannet; G Chassot; T Lehmann; M Volery; A Golay Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2000-12 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Nicolas V Christou; John S Sampalis; Moishe Liberman; Didier Look; Stephane Auger; Alexander P H McLean; Lloyd D MacLean Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2004-09 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Sai Krupa Das; Susan B Roberts; Megan A McCrory; L K George Hsu; Scott A Shikora; Joseph J Kehayias; Gerard E Dallal; Edward Saltzman Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2003-07 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Philip R Schauer; Bartolome Burguera; Sayeed Ikramuddin; Dan Cottam; William Gourash; Giselle Hamad; George M Eid; Samer Mattar; Ramesh Ramanathan; Emma Barinas-Mitchel; R Harsha Rao; Lewis Kuller; David Kelley Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2003-10 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Gregory M Holmes; Charles H Hubscher; Andrei Krassioukov; Lyn B Jakeman; Naomi Kleitman Journal: J Spinal Cord Med Date: 2019-09-26 Impact factor: 1.985