Literature DB >> 28779228

Group and within-group variable selection for competing risks data.

Kwang Woo Ahn1, Anjishnu Banerjee2, Natasha Sahr2, Soyoung Kim2.   

Abstract

Variable selection in the presence of grouped variables is troublesome for competing risks data: while some recent methods deal with group selection only, simultaneous selection of both groups and within-group variables remains largely unexplored. In this context, we propose an adaptive group bridge method, enabling simultaneous selection both within and between groups, for competing risks data. The adaptive group bridge is applicable to independent and clustered data. It also allows the number of variables to diverge as the sample size increases. We show that our new method possesses excellent asymptotic properties, including variable selection consistency at group and within-group levels. We also show superior performance in simulated and real data sets over several competing approaches, including group bridge, adaptive group lasso, and AIC / BIC-based methods.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adaptive penalty; Clustered data; Competing risks data; Group bridge

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28779228      PMCID: PMC5797529          DOI: 10.1007/s10985-017-9400-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal        ISSN: 1380-7870            Impact factor:   1.588


  14 in total

1.  Competing risks regression for clustered data.

Authors:  Bingqing Zhou; Jason Fine; Aurelien Latouche; Myriam Labopin
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2011-10-31       Impact factor: 5.899

2.  Variable selection for multivariate failure time data.

Authors:  Jianwen Cai; Jianqing Fan; Runze Li; Haibo Zhou
Journal:  Biometrika       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.445

3.  Score test of homogeneity for survival data.

Authors:  D Commenges; P K Andersen
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.588

4.  The impact of graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis in reduced-intensity conditioning allogeneic stem cell transplant in acute myeloid leukemia: a study from the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation.

Authors:  Marie Thérèse Rubio; Myriam Labopin; Didier Blaise; Gerard Socié; Rafael Rojas Contreras; Patrice Chevallier; Miguel A Sanz; Stéphane Vigouroux; Anne Huynh; Avichai Shimoni; Claude-Eric Bulabois; Nerea Caminos; Lucía López-Corral; Arnon Nagler; Mohamad Mohty
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 9.941

5.  Outcomes of pediatric bone marrow transplantation for leukemia and myelodysplasia using matched sibling, mismatched related, or matched unrelated donors.

Authors:  Peter J Shaw; Fangyu Kan; Kwang Woo Ahn; Stephen R Spellman; Mahmoud Aljurf; Mouhab Ayas; Michael Burke; Mitchell S Cairo; Allen R Chen; Stella M Davies; Haydar Frangoul; James Gajewski; Robert Peter Gale; Kamar Godder; Gregory A Hale; Martin B A Heemskerk; John Horan; Naynesh Kamani; Kimberly A Kasow; Ka Wah Chan; Stephanie J Lee; Wing H Leung; Victor A Lewis; David Miklos; Machteld Oudshoorn; Effie W Petersdorf; Olle Ringdén; Jean Sanders; Kirk R Schultz; Adriana Seber; Michelle Setterholm; Donna A Wall; Lolie Yu; Michael A Pulsipher
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2010-07-29       Impact factor: 22.113

6.  Model selection in competing risks regression.

Authors:  Deborah Kuk; Ravi Varadhan
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2013-02-24       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  The analysis of failure times in the presence of competing risks.

Authors:  R L Prentice; J D Kalbfleisch; A V Peterson; N Flournoy; V T Farewell; N E Breslow
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1978-12       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Marginal models for clustered time-to-event data with competing risks using pseudovalues.

Authors:  Brent R Logan; Mei-Jie Zhang; John P Klein
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Antilymphocyte Globulin for Prevention of Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease.

Authors:  Nicolaus Kröger; Carlos Solano; Christine Wolschke; Giuseppe Bandini; Francesca Patriarca; Massimo Pini; Arnon Nagler; Carmine Selleri; Antonio Risitano; Giuseppe Messina; Wolfgang Bethge; Jaime Pérez de Oteiza; Rafael Duarte; Angelo Michele Carella; Michele Cimminiello; Stefano Guidi; Jürgen Finke; Nicola Mordini; Christelle Ferra; Jorge Sierra; Domenico Russo; Mario Petrini; Giuseppe Milone; Fabio Benedetti; Marion Heinzelmann; Domenico Pastore; Manuel Jurado; Elisabetta Terruzzi; Franco Narni; Andreas Völp; Francis Ayuk; Tapani Ruutu; Francesca Bonifazi
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  VARIABLE SELECTION FOR CENSORED QUANTILE REGRESION.

Authors:  Huixia Judy Wang; Jianhui Zhou; Yi Li
Journal:  Stat Sin       Date:  2013-01-01       Impact factor: 1.261

View more
  5 in total

1.  Nonparametric competing risks analysis using Bayesian Additive Regression Trees.

Authors:  Rodney Sparapani; Brent R Logan; Robert E McCulloch; Purushottam W Laud
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 3.021

2.  Risk Factor Identification in Heterogeneous Disease Progression with L1-Regularized Multi-state Models.

Authors:  Xuan Dang; Shuai Huang; Xiaoning Qian
Journal:  J Healthc Inform Res       Date:  2021-01-04

3.  Scalable Algorithms for Large Competing Risks Data.

Authors:  Eric S Kawaguchi; Jenny I Shen; Marc A Suchard; Gang Li
Journal:  J Comput Graph Stat       Date:  2020-12-11       Impact factor: 1.884

4.  Bi-level variable selection for case-cohort studies with group variables.

Authors:  Soyoung Kim; Kwang Woo Ahn
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2018-10-11       Impact factor: 3.021

5.  Optimal treatment regimes for competing risk data using doubly robust outcome weighted learning with bi-level variable selection.

Authors:  Yizeng He; Soyoung Kim; Mi-Ok Kim; Wael Saber; Kwang Woo Ahn
Journal:  Comput Stat Data Anal       Date:  2021-01-14       Impact factor: 2.035

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.