| Literature DB >> 25769546 |
Marie Thérèse Rubio1, Myriam Labopin2, Didier Blaise3, Gerard Socié4, Rafael Rojas Contreras5, Patrice Chevallier6, Miguel A Sanz7, Stéphane Vigouroux8, Anne Huynh9, Avichai Shimoni10, Claude-Eric Bulabois11, Nerea Caminos12, Lucía López-Corral13, Arnon Nagler14, Mohamad Mohty15.
Abstract
The impact of the intensity of graft-versus-host-disease immunoprophylaxis on transplantation outcomes in patients undergoing transplantation following reduced-intensity conditioning is unclear. This study addresses this issue in 228 adult patients above 50 years of age with acute myeloid leukemia in first complete remission given peripheral blood stem cells from HLA-identical siblings after fludarabine and 2 days of intravenous busulfan reduced-intensity conditioning. A total of 152 patients received anti-thymocyte globulin, either in combination with cyclosporine A in 86 patients (group 1), or with cyclosporine A and mycophenolate mofetil or short course methotrexate in 66 patients (group 2). The remaining 76 patients did not receive anti-thymocyte globulin but were given cyclosporine A and methotrexate or mycophenolate mofetil (group 3). Incidences of grade II-IV acute graft-versus-host-disease were comparable in the three groups (16.5%, 29.5% and 19.5% in groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively, P=0.15). In multivariate analysis, the absence of anti-thymocyte globulin was the only factor associated with a higher risk of chronic graft-versus-host-disease (P=0.005), while the use of triple immunosuppression (group 3) was associated with an increased risk of relapse (P=0.003). In comparison to anti-thymocyte globulin and cyclosporine A alone, the other two strategies of graft-versus-host-disease prophylaxis were associated with reduced leukemia-free survival and overall survival (P=0.001 for each parameter), independently of the dose of anti-thymocyte globulin. These data suggest that fine tuning of the intensity of this prophylaxis can affect the outcome of transplantation and that anti-thymocyte globulin and cyclosporine A alone should be the preferred combination with the fludarabine-busulfan reduced-intensity conditioning regimen and sibling donors. Copyright© Ferrata Storti Foundation.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25769546 PMCID: PMC4420218 DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2014.119339
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Haematologica ISSN: 0390-6078 Impact factor: 9.941