Literature DB >> 2877912

A multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled comparison of nocturnal and twice-a-day famotidine in the treatment of active duodenal ulcer disease.

N Gitlin, A J McCullough, J L Smith, G Mantell, R Berman.   

Abstract

The efficacy and safety of famotidine, a potent new long-acting H2-receptor antagonist, was compared with placebo in a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study in the United States. A total of 384 patients with endoscopically proven acute duodenal ulcer disease were enrolled. Patients received either famotidine or a placebo. The patients receiving famotidine were treated with one of three dose regimens, 40 mg h.s., 40 mg b.i.d., or 20 mg b.i.d. Patients were reassessed by endoscopy at 2, 4, and 8 wk if ulcer healing had not occurred sooner. A diary was kept to record the duration and intensity of the day and night pain and the amount of Gelusil antacid (Parke-Davis, Morris Plains, N.J.) ingested. Three hundred sixty-three patients met the evaluation criteria. The results revealed a 4-wk healing rate of 70%, 75%, 67%, and 31% for the famotidine 40 mg h.s., 40 mg b.i.d., 20 mg b.i.d., and placebo groups, respectively. The 8-wk healing rates for the same respective groups were 83%, 82%, 82%, 45%. Ulcer pain and antacid consumption occurred less often in the famotidine groups. The clinical and laboratory safety profile of the famotidine groups was similar to that of the placebo group. Famotidine appears to be an effective and safe once-a-day therapy for the treatment of acute duodenal ulcer disease. The recommended dosage is 40 mg h.s.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 2877912     DOI: 10.1016/0016-5085(87)90838-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastroenterology        ISSN: 0016-5085            Impact factor:   22.682


  10 in total

1.  Peptic ulcer disease. Pathophysiology and current medical management.

Authors:  B F Scharschmidt
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1987-06

Review 2.  Famotidine. An updated review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic use in peptic ulcer disease and other allied diseases.

Authors:  H D Langtry; S M Grant; K L Goa
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  Omeprazole versus placebo in duodenal ulcer healing. The United States experience.

Authors:  D Y Graham; A McCullough; M Sklar; S J Sontag; W M Roufail; R C Stone; R H Bishop; N Gitlin; A J Cagliola; R S Berman
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  The growth capacity of hematopoietic progenitor cells in severe neutropenia induced by famotidine.

Authors:  T Liersch; J H Beyer; G Krieger; K Vehmeyer
Journal:  Ann Hematol       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 3.673

5.  Inhibition of nocturnal acidity is important but not essential for duodenal ulcer healing.

Authors:  G Bianchi Porro; F Parente; O Sangaletti
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 6.  pH, healing rate and symptom relief in acid-related diseases.

Authors:  J Q Huang; R H Hunt
Journal:  Yale J Biol Med       Date:  1996 Mar-Apr

Review 7.  Evaluation and management of patients with recurrent peptic ulcer disease after acid-reducing operations: a systematic review.

Authors:  Richard H Turnage; George Sarosi; Byron Cryer; Stuart Spechler; Walter Peterson; Mark Feldman
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2003 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 8.  Histamine H2-receptor antagonists in peptic ulcer disease. Efficacy in healing peptic ulcers.

Authors:  M Deakin; J G Williams
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 9.546

9.  Prospective multicentre study of risk factors associated with delayed healing of recurrent duodenal ulcers (RUDER). RUDER Study Group.

Authors:  D Armstrong; R Arnold; M Classen; M Fischer; H Goebell; A L Blum
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 23.059

10.  Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of famotidine in patients with reflux oesophagitis.

Authors:  U Gladziwa; S Wagner; K V Dakshinamurty; E el Desoky; B Dreuw; U Klotz
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.953

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.