Literature DB >> 28779000

Diabetes Presentation in Infancy: High Risk of Diabetic Ketoacidosis.

Lisa R Letourneau1, David Carmody2, Kristen Wroblewski3, Anna M Denson1, May Sanyoura1, Rochelle N Naylor1,4, Louis H Philipson1, Siri Atma W Greeley5,4.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2017        PMID: 28779000      PMCID: PMC5606305          DOI: 10.2337/dc17-1145

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Care        ISSN: 0149-5992            Impact factor:   19.112


× No keyword cloud information.
Diabetes in childhood has been associated with increased morbidity and mortality, but the risks for diabetes in infancy remain unclear. Cases with onset of hyperglycemia in the first 6 months of life consist predominantly of monogenic diabetes, whereas type 1 autoimmune diabetes accounts for the majority of cases beyond this threshold. Regardless of etiology, diabetes symptoms tend to be difficult to recognize in an infant, putting patients at increased risk for delays in diagnosis, which may lead to higher blood glucose levels and diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) at presentation. Here, we report a high degree of morbidity among a cohort of subjects with infancy-onset diabetes. We examined diagnosis records from 88 cases with diabetes onset ≤13 months of age collected through the University of Chicago Monogenic Diabetes Registry (1). We assessed laboratory values and sign/symptoms, and if a causal mutation for diabetes was detected, participants were subdivided by similar mutation subtypes. Data were managed using REDCap electronic data capture tools and analyzed using Stata version 14 (StataCorp, 2015). The majority of participants were male (n = 46, 52%), Caucasian (n = 55, 63%), and living in the United States (n = 83, 94%). There was no significant difference across mutation subtypes based on socioeconomic status (P = 0.19), race/ethnicity (P = 0.36), or sex (P = 0.07). KCNJ11-related diabetes was the most common form of infancy-onset diabetes (37.5%, n = 33), followed by “Unknown” (likely type 1 diabetes) (21.6%, n = 19); 14% (n = 12) had transient neonatal diabetes. Median age at diabetes diagnosis was 10.4 weeks and was significantly different by mutation subtype (Table 1). When grouped into permanent versus transient diabetes, diagnosis age was significantly lower in the transient group (median 15.2 weeks vs. 0.43 weeks, P < 0.001). The most commonly reported signs/symptoms were polyuria (n = 32), tachypnea (n = 31), flu-like symptoms (n = 30), tiredness/weakness (n = 28), dehydration (n = 27), and “not acting right” (n = 26). Blood glucose, pH, bicarbonate, HbA1c, and DKA were dependent on mutation subtype (Table 1). Overall frequency of DKA was 66.2% (Table 1), and odds of DKA increased with age at diagnosis (odds ratio per 1 month increase 1.23 [95% CI 1.04, 1.45]).
Table 1

Details of diabetes diagnosis by mutation subtype

KCNJ11/ABCC8*INS/EIF2AK3*6q24*FOXP3/IL2RA*GATA6/PDX1*Unknown (likely T1D)*Total*P value
Number of participants, n (%)41 (46.6)13 (14.8)10 (11.4)3 (3.4)2 (2.3)19 (21.6)88 (100)
Current age, years9.5 (5.2–14)5.3 (2.5–8.6)3.7 (1.4–5.4)3.3 (3.2–6.6)3.2 (2.2–4.2)10.9 (6.7–17.9)7.7 (4.1–14.0)
Age at diagnosis, weeks9.6 (6.1–18.3)10 (6.1–17.4)0.4 (0–0.9)14.8 (0–22.2)9.1 (0–18.3)42.6 (37.4–50.4)10.4 (5.2–26.5)<0.001
Glucose, mg/dL716.5 (563–870)435 (319–625)408 (300–502)920 (342–1,600)411 (355–467)736 (526–840)618 (477–800)<0.001
pH§7.07 (6.87–7.26)7.41 (7.4–7.43)7.43 (7.39–7.46)6.95 (6.9–7.0)7.11 (6.9–7.31)7.08 (7.0–7.27)7.08 (6.98–7.31)0.02
Bicarbonate, mmol/L6.0 (4.6–11.0)16.4 (15.0–25.0)21.1 (20.0–21.8)13.0 (6.0–20.0)16.0 (7.0–25.0)5.0 (4.0–10.4)7.0 (5.0–18.8)0.005
HbA1c, % [mmol/mol]12.0 [108] (9.3–13.6) ([78–125])9.9 [85] (8.5–10.9) ([69–96])NA4.9 [30]NA8.8 [73] (6.9–9.8) ([52–84])9.9 [85] (8.3–12.2) ([67–110])0.04
DKA, n (%)#26 (78.8)3 (30)0 (0)3 (100)1 (50)14 (87.5)47 (66.2)<0.001

All data presented as median (interquartile range) unless otherwise specified. T1D, type 1 diabetes; NA, not available.

*In most cases, the mutation subtype was not reported in the medical record but rather was available for each case through the Monogenic Diabetes Registry data. Mutation subtypes were grouped according to functional similarities. All participants in the “Unknown” category did not have an identifiable monogenic cause of diabetes at the time of data analysis. Some of these participants had positive diabetes autoantibodies, and thus likely had autoimmune type 1 diabetes. “Total” category represents pooled participants.

†Statistically significant by Wilcoxon rank sum test, Kruskal-Wallis test, or Fisher exact test. Because of limited sample sizes, pairwise comparisons were not performed.

‡Data available from 73 participants.

§Data available from 49 participants.

‖Data available from 58 participants.

¶Data available from 27 participants; HbA1c <6 months are underestimated owing to fetal hemoglobin.

#Data available from 71 participants.

Details of diabetes diagnosis by mutation subtype All data presented as median (interquartile range) unless otherwise specified. T1D, type 1 diabetes; NA, not available. *In most cases, the mutation subtype was not reported in the medical record but rather was available for each case through the Monogenic Diabetes Registry data. Mutation subtypes were grouped according to functional similarities. All participants in the “Unknown” category did not have an identifiable monogenic cause of diabetes at the time of data analysis. Some of these participants had positive diabetes autoantibodies, and thus likely had autoimmune type 1 diabetes. “Total” category represents pooled participants. †Statistically significant by Wilcoxon rank sum test, Kruskal-Wallis test, or Fisher exact test. Because of limited sample sizes, pairwise comparisons were not performed. ‡Data available from 73 participants. §Data available from 49 participants. ‖Data available from 58 participants. ¶Data available from 27 participants; HbA1c <6 months are underestimated owing to fetal hemoglobin. #Data available from 71 participants. In this study—the largest of its kind—DKA was more frequent than in other early-onset U.S. studies (2,3) or other cohorts of patients with neonatal diabetes (4,5). One reason for this may be a delay in diagnosis, which is reflected in the increased likelihood of DKA at a later age of diagnosis found in our study. This delay may be related to the challenge of diagnosing diabetes in infants who cannot communicate symptoms and in whom polydipsia and polyuria may not be readily apparent and could even be reassuring to clinicians. Presentation characteristics were different by mutation subtype, therefore this information (in addition to genetic testing) may help to guide providers when making clinical decisions. Continuing to educate pediatric providers about the many ways that infants can present with diabetes may help to diagnose cases more efficiently and ultimately decrease the frequency of DKA at diagnosis. Further study is needed to develop effective strategies to reduce morbidity and mortality in this vulnerable population.
  5 in total

1.  Trends in the prevalence of ketoacidosis at diabetes diagnosis: the SEARCH for diabetes in youth study.

Authors:  Dana Dabelea; Arleta Rewers; Jeanette M Stafford; Debra A Standiford; Jean M Lawrence; Sharon Saydah; Giuseppina Imperatore; Ralph B D'Agostino; Elizabeth J Mayer-Davis; Catherine Pihoker
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2014-03-31       Impact factor: 7.124

2.  Creation of the Web-based University of Chicago Monogenic Diabetes Registry: using technology to facilitate longitudinal study of rare subtypes of diabetes.

Authors:  Siri Atma W Greeley; Rochelle N Naylor; Lindsay S Cook; Susan E Tucker; Rebecca B Lipton; Louis H Philipson
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2011-07-01

3.  Switching from insulin to oral sulfonylureas in patients with diabetes due to Kir6.2 mutations.

Authors:  Ewan R Pearson; Isabelle Flechtner; Pål R Njølstad; Maciej T Malecki; Sarah E Flanagan; Brian Larkin; Frances M Ashcroft; Iwar Klimes; Ethel Codner; Violeta Iotova; Annabelle S Slingerland; Julian Shield; Jean-Jacques Robert; Jens J Holst; Penny M Clark; Sian Ellard; Oddmund Søvik; Michel Polak; Andrew T Hattersley
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-08-03       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Characteristics at diagnosis of type 1 diabetes in children younger than 6 years.

Authors:  Maryanne Quinn; Amy Fleischman; Bernard Rosner; Daniel J Nigrin; Joseph I Wolfsdorf
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.406

5.  Activating mutations in the gene encoding the ATP-sensitive potassium-channel subunit Kir6.2 and permanent neonatal diabetes.

Authors:  Anna L Gloyn; Ewan R Pearson; Jennifer F Antcliff; Peter Proks; G Jan Bruining; Annabelle S Slingerland; Neville Howard; Shubha Srinivasan; José M C L Silva; Janne Molnes; Emma L Edghill; Timothy M Frayling; I Karen Temple; Deborah Mackay; Julian P H Shield; Zdenek Sumnik; Adrian van Rhijn; Jerry K H Wales; Penelope Clark; Shaun Gorman; Javier Aisenberg; Sian Ellard; Pål R Njølstad; Frances M Ashcroft; Andrew T Hattersley
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-04-29       Impact factor: 91.245

  5 in total
  18 in total

Review 1.  Neonatal Diabetes Mellitus: An Update on Diagnosis and Management.

Authors:  Michelle Blanco Lemelman; Lisa Letourneau; Siri Atma W Greeley
Journal:  Clin Perinatol       Date:  2017-12-16       Impact factor: 3.430

Review 2.  Monogenic diabetes: the impact of making the right diagnosis.

Authors:  Anastasia G Harris; Lisa R Letourneau; Siri Atma W Greeley
Journal:  Curr Opin Pediatr       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 2.856

Review 3.  Precision Medicine: Long-Term Treatment with Sulfonylureas in Patients with Neonatal Diabetes Due to KCNJ11 Mutations.

Authors:  Lisa R Letourneau; Siri Atma W Greeley
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 4.810

4.  Successful transition from insulin to sulphonylurea in a child with neonatal diabetes mellitus diagnosed beyond six months of age due to C42R mutation in the KCNJ11 gene.

Authors:  Sarah Wing-Yiu Poon; Brian Hon-Yin Chung; Mandy Ho-Yin Tsang; Joanna Yuet-Ling Tung
Journal:  Clin Pediatr Endocrinol       Date:  2022-05-17

Review 5.  Congenital forms of diabetes: the beta-cell and beyond.

Authors:  Lisa R Letourneau; Siri Atma W Greeley
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 5.578

Review 6.  Overview of Atypical Diabetes.

Authors:  Jaclyn Tamaroff; Marissa Kilberg; Sara E Pinney; Shana McCormack
Journal:  Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am       Date:  2020-10-14       Impact factor: 4.741

7.  Uncommon Presentations of Diabetes: Zebras in the Herd.

Authors:  Karen L Shidler; Lisa R Letourneau; Lucia M Novak
Journal:  Clin Diabetes       Date:  2020-01

Review 8.  Congenital Diabetes: Comprehensive Genetic Testing Allows for Improved Diagnosis and Treatment of Diabetes and Other Associated Features.

Authors:  Lisa R Letourneau; Siri Atma W Greeley
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 4.810

9.  Clinical and molecular characteristics of infantile-onset diabetes mellitus in Egypt.

Authors:  Yasmine Abdelmeguid; Ehsan Wafa Mowafy; Iman Marzouk; Elisa De Franco; Shaymaa ElSayed
Journal:  Ann Pediatr Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2022-01-26

10.  Early Intensive Insulin Use May Preserve β-Cell Function in Neonatal Diabetes Due to Mutations in the Proinsulin Gene.

Authors:  Lisa R Letourneau; David Carmody; Louis H Philipson; Siri Atma W Greeley
Journal:  J Endocr Soc       Date:  2017-11-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.