| Literature DB >> 28778939 |
Jin-Seok Kim1, Seung Yong Shin2, Jun Hyuk Kang1, Hwan Seok Yong3, Jin Oh Na1, Cheol Ung Choi1, Seong Hwan Kim1, Eung Ju Kim1, Seung-Woon Rha1, Chang Gyu Park1, Hong Seog Seo1, Dong Joo Oh1, Chun Hwang4, Young-Hoon Kim1, Hong Euy Lim5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) is known to play an important role in atrial fibrillation substrate remodeling; however, the influence of sex on the association between EAT and left atrial (LA) transport function has not been elucidated. METHODS ANDEntities:
Keywords: atrial fibrillation; computed tomography; epicardial fat; left atrial function; sex differences
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28778939 PMCID: PMC5586448 DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.117.006077
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Am Heart Assoc ISSN: 2047-9980 Impact factor: 5.501
Figure 1Total and periatrial EAT volume measurements on multislice computed tomography. A, Image analysis method for quantifying the total and periatrial EAT volumes. B, Representative examples of the measured total and periatrial EAT volumes in both sexes. EAT indicates epicardial adipose tissue; P/T EAT ratio, the proportion of periatrial to total EAT.
Baseline Characteristics of Study Participants
| Variable | Men (n=123) | Women (n=123) |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, y | 64.4±9.9 | 65.7±9.5 | 0.289 |
| BMI, kg/m2 | 24.3±2.5 | 24.3±3.0 | 0.800 |
| Persistent AF, % | 56 (41.2) | 49 (36.0) | 0.455 |
| Coronary artery disease, % | 18 (14.6) | 14 (11.4) | 0.448 |
| Heart failure, % | 16 (13.0) | 18 (14.6) | 0.854 |
| Hypertension, % | 67 (49.3) | 70 (51.5) | 0.808 |
| Diabetes mellitus, % | 19 (14.0) | 22 (16.2) | 0.735 |
| Previous stroke/TIA, % | 11 (8.1) | 12 (8.8) | 1.000 |
| CHADS2 score | 1.3±1.1 | 1.5±1.2 | 0.712 |
| Medications | |||
| ACEI/ARB | 51 (41.5) | 55 (44.7) | 0.607 |
| Beta blocker | 30 (24.4) | 28 (22.8) | 0.764 |
| Statins | 22 (17.9) | 18 (14.6) | 0.489 |
| Echocardiography | |||
| LVEF, % | 65.5±9.7 | 65.2±10.6 | 0.803 |
| LAV, mL | 73.2±25.3 | 77.0±26.2 | 0.270 |
| Diastolic dysfunction (1–4) | 0.6±0.8 | 0.8±0.9 | 1.000 |
| Laboratory findings | |||
| Total cholesterol, mg/dL | 172.6±33.7 | 180.0±38.9 | 0.159 |
| Triglyceride, mg/dL | 120.7±48.0 | 117.1±55.7 | 0.629 |
| HDL cholesterol, mg/dL | 48.8±13.1 | 52.1±13.3 | 0.080 |
| LDL cholesterol, mg/dL | 106.5±30.7 | 111.9±33.9 | 0.240 |
| hs‐CRP, mg/dL | 1.6±3.2 | 1.4±2.2 | 0.583 |
| NT‐proBNP, pg/mL | 127.7 (60.6–266.7) | 125.4 (66.3–420.9) | 0.523 |
| Adiponectin, μg/mL | 11.5±4.8 | 12.9±4.5 | 0.022 |
Data are expressed as n (%), mean±SD, or median (25th–75th percentile). ACEI/ARB indicates angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker; AF, atrial fibrillation; BMI, body mass index; HDL, high‐density lipoprotein; hs‐CRP, high‐sensitivity C‐reactive protein; LAV, left atrial volume; LDL, low‐density lipoprotein; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; NT‐proBNP, N‐terminal probrain natriuretic peptide; TIA, transient ischemic attack.
Left Atrial Function and Epicardial Adiposity Measured by Multislice Computed Tomography
| Variable | Men (n=123) | Women (n=123) |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| LAV, mL | 131.5±35.2 | 133.2±37.1 | 0.698 |
| LAEF, % | 21.4±11.2 | 18.6±10.0 | 0.042 |
| EAT | |||
| Total EAT, mL | 82.9±30.8 | 68.4±26.5 | <0.001 |
| Periatrial EAT, mL | 13.3±5.8 | 14.0±6.7 | 0.363 |
| P/T EAT ratio, % | 16.7±6.1 | 22.3±10.3 | <0.001 |
Data are expressed as mean±SD. EAT indicates epicardial adipose tissue; LAEF, left atrial emptying fraction; LAV, left atrial volume; P/T EAT ratio, proportion of periatrial to total EAT.
Figure 2Linear correlations between LAEF and total EAT (A), periatrial EAT (B), P/T EAT ratio (C), and serum adiponectin level (D) in men and women. EAT indicates epicardial adipose tissue; LAEF, left atrial emptying fraction; P/T EAT ratio, the proportion of periatrial to total EAT.
Univariate and Multivariate Analysis for Factors Affecting LAEF in Men and Women
| Men | Women | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Univariate Analysis | Multivariate Analysis | Univariate Analysis | Multivariate Analysis | |||||
| β |
| β |
| β |
| β |
| |
| Age, y | −0.098 | 0.283 | 0.117 | 0.190 | ||||
| BMI, kg/m2 | −0.229 | 0.011 | −0.012 | 0.900 | 0.139 | 0.129 | ||
| Hypertension | −0.052 | 0.569 | 0.067 | 0.459 | ||||
| Diabetes mellitus | −0.108 | 0.233 | 0.173 | 0.056 | ||||
| Heart failure | −0.020 | 0.827 | −0.204 | 0.023 | −0.133 | 0.136 | ||
| Previous stroke/TIA | 0.030 | 0.743 | −0.065 | 0.478 | ||||
| hs‐CRP, mg/dL | −0.076 | 0.440 | −0.224 | 0.018 | −0.060 | 0.426 | ||
| NT‐proBNP, pg/mL | −0.203 | 0.040 | −0.093 | 0.314 | −0.224 | 0.017 | −0.274 | 0.032 |
| Total cholesterol, mg/dL | 0.118 | 0.253 | −0.122 | 0.228 | ||||
| Triglyceride, mg/dL | 0.059 | 0.571 | 0.040 | 0.693 | ||||
| HDL cholesterol, mg/dL | −0.092 | 0.377 | −0.054 | 0.594 | ||||
| LDL cholesterol, mg/dL | 0.161 | 0.118 | −0.103 | 0.308 | ||||
| LVEF, % | 0.314 | 0.001 | 0.073 | 0.428 | 0.122 | 0.199 | ||
| LAV on MSCT, mL | −0.269 | 0.003 | −0.182 | 0.048 | −0.180 | 0.046 | −0.152 | 0.038 |
| Total EAT, mL | −0.033 | 0.204 | −0.179 | 0.057 | ||||
| Periatrial EAT, mL | −0.162 | 0.083 | −0.347 | 0.023 | −0.189 | 0.030 | ||
| P/T EAT ratio, % | −0.204 | 0.024 | −0.204 | 0.027 | −0.214 | 0.018 | −0.274 | 0.002 |
| Adiponectin, ng/mL | 0.082 | 0.366 | 0.134 | 0.138 | ||||
BMI indicates body mass index; EAT, epicardial adipose tissue; HDL, high‐density lipoprotein; hs‐CRP, high‐sensitivity C‐reactive protein; LAEF, left atrial emptying fraction; LAV, left atrial volume; LDL, low‐density lipoprotein; MSCT, multislice computed tomography; NT‐proBNP, N‐terminal probrain natriuretic peptide; P/T EAT ratio, proportion of periatrial to total EAT; TIA, transient ischemic attack.
Figure 3A, Comparison of the mean bipolar LA voltage amplitude between men and women. B, Relationship between LA voltage and P/T EAT ratio in men and women. EAT indicates epicardial adipose tissue; LA, left atrial; P/T EAT ratio, the proportion of periatrial to total EAT.