| Literature DB >> 28776207 |
Rianne Jahja1, Francjan J van Spronsen2, Leo M J de Sonneville3, Jaap J van der Meere4, Annet M Bosch5, Carla E M Hollak5, M Estela Rubio-Gozalbo6, Martijn C G J Brouwers7, Floris C Hofstede8, Maaike C de Vries9, Mirian C H Janssen9, Ans T van der Ploeg10, Janneke G Langendonk10, Stephan C J Huijbregts3,11.
Abstract
Cognitive and mental health problems in individuals with the inherited metabolic disorder phenylketonuria (PKU) have often been associated with metabolic control and its history. For the present study executive functioning (EF) was assessed in 21 PKU patients during childhood (T1, mean age 10.4 years, SD = 2.0) and again in adulthood (T2, mean age 25.8 years, SD = 2.3). At T2 additional assessments of EF in daily life and mental health were performed. Childhood (i.e. 0-12 years) blood phenylalanine was significantly related to cognitive flexibility, executive motor control, EF in daily life and mental health in adulthood (i.e. at T2). Patients with a greater increase in phenylalanine levels after the age of 12 performed more poorly on EF-tasks at T2. Group-based analyses showed that patients with phenylalanine <360 µmol/L in childhood and phenylalanine ≥360 µmol/L from age 13 onwards (n = 11) had better cognitive flexibility and executive motor control than those who had phenylalanine ≥360 µmol/L throughout life (n = 7), supporting the notion that phenylalanine should be below the recommended upper treatment target of 360 µmol/L during childhood for better outcome in adulthood. Despite some results indicating additional influence of phenylalanine levels between 13 and 17 years of age, evidence for a continued influence of phenylalanine levels after childhood on adult outcomes was largely lacking. This may be explained by the fact that the patients in the present study had relatively low phenylalanine levels during childhood (mean: 330 µmol/L, range: 219-581 µmol/L) and thereafter (mean Index of Dietary Control at T2: 464 µmol/L, range: 276-743 µmol/L), which may have buffered against transitory periods of poor metabolic control during adolescence and early adulthood.Entities:
Keywords: Adults; Executive functioning; Executive motor control; Longitudinal; Mental health; Phenylketonuria
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28776207 PMCID: PMC5574956 DOI: 10.1007/s10519-017-9863-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Behav Genet ISSN: 0001-8244 Impact factor: 2.805
Descriptive statistics PKU, and ‘low–high’ groups
| PKU = 21 | Low–low = 3a | Low–high = 11 | High–high = 7 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean age T1 ± SD (range) | 10.5 ± 2.0 (6.9–13.7) | 11.0 ± 2.3 (9.3–13.6) | 10.7 ± 2.1 (6.9–13.7) | 9.9 ± 1.7 (7.0–12.4) |
| Mean age T2 ± SD (range) | 25.8 ± 2.3 (21.0–30.5) | 26.6 ± 2.5 (23.9–28.7) | 25.7 ± 2.8 (21.0–30.5) | 25.7 ± 1.7 (23.0–28.8) |
| Gender (male:female) | 6:15 | 0:3 | 5:6 | 1:6 |
| Socio-economic status: income | 7 Above average | Average | 5 Above average | 2 Above average |
| Socio-economic status: education | 14 Higher education | 3 Higher education | 7 Higher education | 4 Higher education |
| IQ | 102 ± 13 (71–120) | 103 ± 14 (88–115) | 103 ± 9 (92–120) | 101 ± 18 (71–120) |
| Diagnostic Phe measurement | 1300 ± 925 (120–3151) | 205 ± 107 (120–325) | 1252 ± 805 (450–3053) | 1844 ± 904 (750–3151) |
| Biochemical PKU phenotype | 4 HPA; 8 mild PKU; 9 classical PKU | 3 HPA | 1 HPA; 6 mild PKU; 4 classical PKU | 2 mild PKU; 5 classical PKU |
| BH4 responsive | 5 BH4 responsive | 2 BH4 responsive | 2 BH4 responsive | 1 BH4 responsive |
| Concurrent Phe T1 ± SD (range) | 346 ± 204 (30–860) | 308 (2 missing) | 257 ± 157 (30–475) | 491 ± 211 (245–860) |
| IDC T1 ± SD (range) | 315 ± 92 (192–548) | 326 ± 53 (294–388) | 252 ± 42 (192–327) | 409 ± 84 (320–548) |
| Concurrent Phe T2 ± SD (range) | 719 ± 351 (259–1550) | 357 ± 87 (259–427) | 807 ± 403 (336–1550) | 735 ± 241 (345–1000) |
| IDC T2 ± SD (range) | 464 ± 138 (276–743) | 291 ± 15 (276–306) | 424 ± 79 (322–547) | 602 ± 112 (446–743) |
| IDC difference score (IDC2 minus IDC1) | 149 ± 120 (−82–330) | −35 ± −41 (−82 to −6) | 172 ± 93 (52–322) | 194 ± 112 (−6–330) |
| Phe 0–12 years ± SD (range) | 330 ± 91 (219–581) | 308 ± 35 (286–348) | 270 ± 40 (219–331) | 434 ± 71 (380–581) |
| Phe 13–17 years ± SD (range) | 533 ± 246 (267–1069) | 293 ± 30 (268–326) | 475 ± 172 (272–764) | 728 ± 269 (267–1069) |
| Phe >18 years ± SD (range) | 651 ± 258 (226–1105) | 253 ± 23 (226–267) | 658 ± 202 (465–1068) | 809 ± 211 (528–1105) |
BH4 tetrahydrobiopterin, IDC index of dietary control, PKU phenotype based on diagnostic Phe measurement, HPA hyperphenylalaninemia, Phe 120–600 µmol/L, mild PKU Phe 600–1200 µmol/L, classical PKU Phe >1200 µmol/L
aThe low–low group was excluded from statistical analyses because the sample size was too small
Pearson correlations between indicators of metabolic control
| Concurrent Phe at T1 | IDC at T1 | Concurrent Phe at T2 | IDC at T2 | IDC difference score | Phe 0–12 years | Phe 13–17 years | Phe ≥18years | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Concurrent Phe at T1 | 1.000 | |||||||
| IDC at T1 |
| 1.000 | ||||||
| Concurrent Phe at T2 | 0.221 | −0.117 | 1.000 | |||||
| IDC at T2 |
|
|
| 1.000 | ||||
| IDC difference score | 0.170 | −0.174 |
|
| 1.000 | |||
| Phe 0–12 years |
|
| 0.041 |
| 0.078 | 1.000 | ||
| Phe 13–17 years | 0.387+ | 0.234 |
|
|
|
| 1.000 | |
| Phe ≥18 years | 0.385+ | 0.170 |
|
|
| 0.328+ |
| 1.000 |
p < 0.05 values are indicated in bold
IDC index of dietary control, T1 time point 1 in childhood, T2 time point 2 in adulthood
*p < 0.05 **p < 0.01 ***p < 0.001,+ p < 0.10 (1-tailed)
Partial correlations (Pearson, 1-tailed) between Phe and ANT
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|
| Flanker—inhibitory control/interference suppression | ||
| % errors T2 | ||
| Phe 13–17 years |
|
|
| IDC difference |
|
|
| IDC T2 |
|
|
| Shifting attentional set-visual—cognitive flexibility | ||
| % errors T2 | ||
| IDC difference | 0.393 | 0.053 |
| Phe 13–17 years |
|
|
| IDC T2 | 0.354 | 0.075 |
| Reaction time T2 | ||
| IDC T1 |
|
|
| Phe 0–12 years |
|
|
| Pursuit—executive motor control | ||
| Mean deviation T2 | ||
| IDC T1 |
|
|
| Phe 0–12 years |
|
|
| Standard deviation T2 | ||
| IDC T1 |
|
|
| Phe 0–12 years |
|
|
p < 0.05 values are indicated in bold
Note only significant correlations and (non-significant) trends shown
IDC index of dietary control, T1 time point 1 in childhood, T2 time point 2 in adulthood
Partial correlations (Pearson, 1-tailed) between Phe and behavior ratings
| IDC T1 | IDC T2 | Phe 0–12 years | Phe 13–17 years | Phe ≥18 years | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| BRIEF-A | ||||||||||
| Behavioural regulation index |
|
|
|
|
|
| 0.173 | 0.239 | 0.288 | 0.116 |
| Global executive composite | 0.329 | 0.084 | 0.361 | 0.064 |
|
| 0.233 | 0.168 | 0.264 | 0.138 |
| ASR | ||||||||||
| Depressive problems | 0.346 | 0.073 |
|
|
|
| 0.322 | 0.090 | 0.266 | 0.135 |
| Anxiety problems | 0.255 | 0.146 | 0.213 | 0.191 | 0.289 | 0.115 | 0.151 | 0.268 | 0.076 | 0.378 |
| Somatic problems |
|
|
|
|
|
| 0.247 | 0.153 | 0.226 | 0.177 |
| Avoidant personality problems | 0.383 | 0.053 | −0.038 | 0.439 | 0.349 | 0.072 | −0.230 | 0.172 | −0.134 | 0.292 |
| Attention deficit/hyperactivity problems |
|
| 0.351 | 0.070 |
|
| 0.169 | 0.244 | 0.211 | 0.193 |
| Antisocial personality problems |
|
|
|
|
|
| 0.182 | 0.277 |
|
|
| Internalizing problems |
|
| 0.130 | 0.298 |
|
| 0.007 | 0.488 | −0.096 | 0.347 |
| Externalizing problems |
|
|
|
|
|
| 0.348 | 0.072 | 0.368 | 0.060 |
| Total score |
|
| 0.342 | 0.074 |
|
| 0.174 | 0.238 | 0.162 | 0.254 |
p < 0.05 values are indicated in bold
IDC index of dietary control, T1 time point 1 in childhood, T2 time point 2 in adulthood, BRIEF-A behavior rating inventory of executive function-adult version, ASR adult self-report
Fig. 1Reaction time of cognitive flexibility. Group effect was significant: at both time points the low–high group performed faster than the high–high group
Fig. 2Executive motor control: accuracy and stability of movement. Time effect was significant for accuracy and stability: all participants improved over time. Group effect was significant for stability only: the low–high group had a more stable executive motor control than the high–high group