| Literature DB >> 28775062 |
Qianqian Li1, Yuanyuan Zhao1,2, Gang Wu3, Shanshan Chen1,4, Yingchao Zhou1, Sisi Li1, Mengchen Zhou1, Qian Fan5, Jielin Pu6, Kui Hong7, Xiang Cheng5, Qing Kenneth Wang8,9, Xin Tu8.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Idiopathic ventricular tachycardia (VT) is a type of cardiac arrhythmia occurring in structurally normal hearts. The heritability of idiopathic VT remains to be clarified, and numerous genetic factors responsible for development of idiopathic VT are as yet unclear. Variations in FGF12 (fibroblast growth factor 12), which is expressed in the human ventricle and modulates the cardiac Na+ channel NaV1.5, may play an important role in the genetic pathogenesis of VT. METHODS ANDEntities:
Keywords: fibroblast growth factor 12; genetic risk factor; variations; ventricular tachycardia
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28775062 PMCID: PMC5586455 DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.117.006130
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Am Heart Assoc ISSN: 2047-9980 Impact factor: 5.501
The Primers of Genotyping and Mutational Analysis for FGF12B
| Exon | Forward | Reverse |
|---|---|---|
| FGF12‐exon01‐HRM | gccctgattaaaatgaaaattga | tgcaaacatttattaaccttttcct |
| FGF12‐exon02‐HRM | ccggcgtttatttttagcag | cgtgcctgtcagcaattcta |
| FGF12‐exon03‐HRM | ttttatggatgtgggcaattt | aggcaagacacacttggaaa |
| FGF12‐exon04‐1‐HRM | caagcggaaagagaaagagc | tgcgaagtagacgtttgcac |
| FGF12‐exon04‐2‐HRM | ttcttccccttccacttggt | cactctccgggcttctactg |
| FGF12‐exon05‐HRM | tttgcagaaccccagctca | ctgggccctacatttgatttg |
| FGF12‐exon06‐HRM | ggattatttattcaaaaggtcactg | gcctaacatgatggttactccat |
| FGF12‐exon07‐HRM | gacaatagttttgatcggctca | cctgcattgctcctgatttt |
| FGF12‐exon08‐1‐HRM | cagaggacatggatttcaagc | ggcggtacagtgtggaagaa |
| FGF12‐exon08‐2‐HRM | gtaccgccagcaagaatcag | gggtccaacaaagacagtcag |
| FGF12‐exon09‐1‐HRM | tgaaggaaatttatgtccactg | agggaagaaggggagagttc |
| FGF12‐exon09‐2‐HRM | tgagaactctccccttcttcc | ccactaggtcttgcgttgtc |
| rs1460922‐HRM | cacgtgcacaaagattagcac | ttcaattctccaaatcctttcc |
| rs4687326‐HRM | tgtatggtgccatattgtttcc | tgcagtttggtagattatcagc |
| rs2686464‐HRM | gggccagactctcttaacca | atcccactccgaagtccag |
| FGF12‐exon01‐SEQ | gggatgtgggctagctagatt | ggaaagtatatctccccttttgg |
Clinical Characteristics of Participants in This Study
| Items | VT/VF Cases | Comparison Controls |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Discovery sample | |||
| Sample size, n | 255 | 289 | |
| Sex, male, n (%) | 157 (62) | 194 (67) |
|
| Age, y, mean±SD | 61±15 | 58±11 | 2.00E‐03 |
| Replication sample | |||
| Sample size, n | 180 | 288 | |
| Sex, male, n (%) | 113 (73) | 159 (55) | 0.06 |
| Age, y, mean±SD | 47±18 | 62±8 |
|
VF indicates ventricular fibrillation; VT, ventricular tachycardia.
Analysis of Allelic Association of SNPs in FGF12B With VT/VF
| SNP | Sample Size, n (Case/Control) | R.A | Frequency (Case/Control) | Without Adjustment | With Adjustment | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| OR (95% CI) |
| OR (95% CI) | ||||
| rs2686464, Discovery sample | 255/289 | C | 0.763/0.750 | 0.701 | 1.07 (0.76–1.51) | 0.390 | 1.18 (0.81–1.71) |
| rs4687326, Discovery sample | 255/289 | T | 0.230/0.217 | 0.637 | 1.08 (0.79–1.47) | 0.414 | 1.14 (0.83–1.58) |
| rs1460922, Discovery sample | 255/289 | G | 0.350/0.252 | 5.77E‐03 | 1.60 (1.14–2.23) | 0.015 | 1.54 (1.09–2.19) |
| rs1460922, Replication sample | 180/288 | G | 0.298/0.225 | 0.029 | 1.46 (1.04–2.05) | 0.018 | 1.64 (1.09–2.48) |
| rs1460922, Combined sample | 435/577 | G | 0.327/0.242 | 2.12E‐04 | 1.56 (1.23–1.98) | 2.52E‐04 | 1.59 (1.24–2.03) |
CI indicates confidential interval; OR, odds ratio; P adj, P value for association after adjusting for covariates of sex and age by multiple logistic regression analysis using SPSS version 17.0; P obs, P value for association before adjusting for covariates of age and sex by 2×2 contingence tables using PLINK version 1.07; R.A, risk allele; SNP, single‐nucleotide polymorphism; VF indicates ventricular fibrillation; VT, ventricular tachycardia.
Analysis of Genotypic Association of SNPs in FGF12B Under 3 Genetic Models
| SNP | Model | Without Adjustment | With Adjustment | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| OR (95% CI) |
| OR (95% CI) | ||
| rs2686464, Discovery sample | Dominant (C) | 0.073 | 2.36 (0.90–6.18) | 0.082 | 2.47 (0.89–6.84) |
| Recessive (C) | 0.682 | 0.92 (0.60–1.40) | 0.848 | 1.05 (0.66–1.65) | |
| Additive (C) | 0.122 | ··· | 0.392 | 1.18 (0.81–1.71) | |
| rs4687326, Discovery sample | Dominant (T) | 0.364 | 1.19 (0.82–1.73) | 0.224 | 1.28 (0.86–1.89) |
| Recessive (T) | 0.447 | 0.72 (0.30–1.69) | 0.606 | 0.79 (0.33–1.91) | |
| Additive (T) | 0.377 | ··· | 0.414 | 1.14 (0.83–1.58) | |
| rs1460922, Discovery sample | Dominant (G) | 0.018 | 1.68 (1.09–2.58) | 0.042 | 1.60 (1.02–2.51) |
| Recessive (G) | 0.017 | 3.18 (1.17–8.64) | 0.030 | 3.17 (1.12–9.01) | |
| Additive (G) | 0.011 | ··· | 0.010 | 1.64 (1.12–2.39) | |
| rs1460922, Replication sample | Dominant (G) | 0.190 | 1.33 (0.87–2.03) | 0.104 | 1.53 (0.92–2.56) |
| Recessive (G) | 0.007 | 3.23 (1.32–7.90) | 0.008 | 4.60 (1.48–14.29) | |
| Additive (G) | 0.024 | ··· | 0.017 | 1.67 (1.10–2.56) | |
| rs1460922, Combined sample | Dominant (G) | 4.00E‐03 | 1.55 (1.15–2.08) | 4.00E‐03 | 1.59 (1.12–2.17) |
| Recessive (G) | 3.70E‐04 | 3.16 (1.63–6.14) | 1.00E‐03 | 3.31 (1.65–6.64) | |
| Additive (G) | 2.79E‐04 | ··· | 1.79E‐04 | 1.64 (1.27–2.12) | |
CI indicates confidential interval; OR, odds ratio; P adj, P value for association after adjusting for covariates of sex and age by multiple logistic regression analysis using SPSS version 17.0; P obs, P value for association before adjusting for covariates of age and sex by 2×2 contingence tables using PLINK version 1.07.
Figure 1The sequencing results for variations and the conservation of 1 nonsynonymous variant and 1 functional SNP. A, The sequencing results for noncoding variation c.742C>T. B, The sequencing results for noncoding variation c.723G>A. C, The conservation of 1 nonsynonymous SNP rs17852067 (p.P211Q).
The Clinical Information of VT Patients With Variations
| GeneID | Mutation | Sex | Age, y | Diagnosis |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 634987 | c.742C>T | Female | 39 | LOVT |
| 529139 | c.723G>A | Female | 53 | RVOT |
| 614250 | P211Q | Female | 47 | RVOT |
| 633085 | P211Q | Male | 14 | RVOT |
| 662250 | P211Q | Male | 64 | ROVT |
LOVT indicates idiopathic ventricular tachycardia from the left ventricular outflow tract; RVOT, right ventricular outflow tract ventricular tachycardia; VT, ventricular tachycardia.
Critical Analysis Information of Variable Locus in FGF12B
| Gene | Location | Type | Transcript | Mutation | SIFT | PolyPhen2 | Condel |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 5′ UTR | Noncoding | ENSP00000413496 | c.742C>T | ··· | ··· | ··· |
| 5′ UTR | Noncoding | ENSP00000413496 | c.723G>A | ··· | ··· | ··· | |
| Exon | SNP | ENSP00000413496 | rs17852067 (p.P211Q) | 0.04 (deleterious) | 1 (probably damaging) | 0.849 (deleterious) |
SIFT predicts whether an amino acid substitution affects protein function. SIFT can be applied to naturally occurring nonsynonymous polymorphisms or laboratory‐induced missense mutations. PolyPhen2 predicts the effect of an amino acid substitution on the structure and function of a protein. Condel is a general method for calculating a consensus prediction from the output of tools designed to predict the effect of an amino acid substitution. The Condel score is the consensus probability that a substitution is deleterious, so values nearer 1 are predicted with greater confidence to affect protein function. Chr indicates chromosome; SNP, single‐nucleotide polymorphism; UTR, untranslated region.
Figure 2P211Q negatively regulates expression of FGF12 protein. A, P211Q significantly decreased the expression level of FGF12 protein in rat cardiac myocyte H9C2 cells compared with wild type by western blot analysis. α‐Tublin was used as loading control. B, The images of western blot analysis shown in (A) were scanned, quantified, and plotted. ****P <0.0001.
Figure 3The prediction of binding domains for the transcription factors in the noncoding variation c.723G>A. A, The binding domains for the transcription factors before the gene point change predicted by TFSEARCH. B, The binding domains for the transcription factors after the gene point change predicted by TFSEARCH. C, The binding domains for the transcription factors before the gene point change by predicted JASPAR. D, The binding domains for the transcription factors after the gene point change predicted by JASPAR.