K L Reinshagen1, H D Curtin2, A M Quesnel3, A F Juliano2. 1. From the Departments of Radiology (K.L.R., H.D.C., A.F.J.) katherine_reinshagen@meei.harvard.edu. 2. From the Departments of Radiology (K.L.R., H.D.C., A.F.J.). 3. Otolaryngology (A.M.Q.), Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Incomplete partition type II of the cochlea, commonly coexisting with an enlarged vestibular aqueduct, can be a challenging diagnosis on MR imaging due to the presence of a dysplastic spiral lamina-basilar membrane neural complex, which can resemble the normal interscalar septum. The purpose of this study was to determine a reproducible, quantitative cochlear measurement to assess incomplete partition type II anomalies in patients with enlarged vestibular aqueducts using normal-hearing ears as a control population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 27 patients with enlarged vestibular aqueducts (54 ears) and 28 patients (33 ears) with normal audiographic findings who underwent MR imaging was performed. Using reformatted images from a cisternographic 3D MR imaging produced in a plane parallel to the lateral semicircular canal, we measured the distance (distance X) between the osseous spiral lamina-basilar membrane complex of the upper basal turn and the first linear signal void anterior to the basilar membrane. RESULTS: The means of distance X in patients with normal hearing and prospectively diagnosed incomplete partition type II were, respectively, 0.93 ± 0.075 mm (range, 0.8-1.1 mm) and 1.55 ± 0.25 mm (range, 1-2.1 mm; P < .001). Using 3 SDs above the mean of patients with normal hearing (1.2 mm) as a cutoff for normal, we diagnosed 21/27 patients as having abnormal cochleas; 4/21 were diagnosed retrospectively. This finding indicated that almost 20% of patients were underdiagnosed. Interobserver agreement with 1.2 mm as a cutoff between normal and abnormal produced a κ score of 0.715 (good). CONCLUSIONS: Incomplete partition type II anomalies on MR imaging can be subtle. A reproducible distance X of ≥1.2 mm is considered abnormal and may help to prospectively diagnose incomplete partition type II anomalies.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Incomplete partition type II of the cochlea, commonly coexisting with an enlarged vestibular aqueduct, can be a challenging diagnosis on MR imaging due to the presence of a dysplastic spiral lamina-basilar membrane neural complex, which can resemble the normal interscalar septum. The purpose of this study was to determine a reproducible, quantitative cochlear measurement to assess incomplete partition type II anomalies in patients with enlarged vestibular aqueducts using normal-hearing ears as a control population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 27 patients with enlarged vestibular aqueducts (54 ears) and 28 patients (33 ears) with normal audiographic findings who underwent MR imaging was performed. Using reformatted images from a cisternographic 3D MR imaging produced in a plane parallel to the lateral semicircular canal, we measured the distance (distance X) between the osseous spiral lamina-basilar membrane complex of the upper basal turn and the first linear signal void anterior to the basilar membrane. RESULTS: The means of distance X in patients with normal hearing and prospectively diagnosed incomplete partition type II were, respectively, 0.93 ± 0.075 mm (range, 0.8-1.1 mm) and 1.55 ± 0.25 mm (range, 1-2.1 mm; P < .001). Using 3 SDs above the mean of patients with normal hearing (1.2 mm) as a cutoff for normal, we diagnosed 21/27 patients as having abnormal cochleas; 4/21 were diagnosed retrospectively. This finding indicated that almost 20% of patients were underdiagnosed. Interobserver agreement with 1.2 mm as a cutoff between normal and abnormal produced a κ score of 0.715 (good). CONCLUSIONS: Incomplete partition type II anomalies on MR imaging can be subtle. A reproducible distance X of ≥1.2 mm is considered abnormal and may help to prospectively diagnose incomplete partition type II anomalies.
Authors: H C Davidson; H R Harnsberger; M M Lemmerling; A A Mancuso; D K White; K A Tong; R T Dahlen; C Shelton Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 1999-09 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: K Bouhadjer; K Tissera; C W Farris; A F Juliano; M E Cunnane; H D Curtin; L A Mankarious; K L Reinshagen Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2021-11-04 Impact factor: 3.825