OBJECTIVES: To investigate an extended cohort of patients with incomplete partition (IP) and examine the adequacy of the existing classifications based on radiological criteria and on their implications for cochlear implantation. METHODS: Patients with IP admitted to a tertiary referral centre during the period 2000-2010 were retrospectively examined. The subjects were initially classified into IP-I, IP-II and atypical cases. For cochlear implant recipients relevant aspects were analysed. RESULTS: Eighty-three ears (49 patients) with IP were found, 19 with IP-I, 54 with IP-II and 10 atypical. Thirty-three patients received a cochlear implant (11 with IP-I, 19 with IP-II and three atypical) achieving heterogeneous though mostly promising results. Cerebrospinal fluid gushing was the commonest surgical complication, particularly in cases of IP-I. In general, patients with IP-II performed better than those with IP-I. CONCLUSIONS: Cochlear implantation promises adequate hearing rehabilitation for most patients with IP. As we move from IP-I to IP-II better results and lower risk for gushing shall be expected. Based on radiological findings we suggest a modified classification into IP-I, atypical IP-I (with large vestibular aqueduct (LVA) and better partition), IP-II (Mondini deformity) and atypical IP-IIa (without LVA) and b (without LVA but with semicircular canal dysplasia). KEY POINTS: • Radiological (CT and MR) features are of crucial importance for cochlear implantation • Imaging can identify two types of incomplete cochlear partition and atypical cases • Detailed pre-operative radiological assessment can help predict complications and outcome • A more comprehensive radiological classification of these anomalies is proposed.
OBJECTIVES: To investigate an extended cohort of patients with incomplete partition (IP) and examine the adequacy of the existing classifications based on radiological criteria and on their implications for cochlear implantation. METHODS:Patients with IP admitted to a tertiary referral centre during the period 2000-2010 were retrospectively examined. The subjects were initially classified into IP-I, IP-II and atypical cases. For cochlear implant recipients relevant aspects were analysed. RESULTS: Eighty-three ears (49 patients) with IP were found, 19 with IP-I, 54 with IP-II and 10 atypical. Thirty-three patients received a cochlear implant (11 with IP-I, 19 with IP-II and three atypical) achieving heterogeneous though mostly promising results. Cerebrospinal fluid gushing was the commonest surgical complication, particularly in cases of IP-I. In general, patients with IP-II performed better than those with IP-I. CONCLUSIONS: Cochlear implantation promises adequate hearing rehabilitation for most patients with IP. As we move from IP-I to IP-II better results and lower risk for gushing shall be expected. Based on radiological findings we suggest a modified classification into IP-I, atypical IP-I (with large vestibular aqueduct (LVA) and better partition), IP-II (Mondini deformity) and atypical IP-IIa (without LVA) and b (without LVA but with semicircular canal dysplasia). KEY POINTS: • Radiological (CT and MR) features are of crucial importance for cochlear implantation • Imaging can identify two types of incomplete cochlear partition and atypical cases • Detailed pre-operative radiological assessment can help predict complications and outcome • A more comprehensive radiological classification of these anomalies is proposed.