Literature DB >> 28774957

Perceptions of control and unrealistic optimism in early-phase cancer trials.

Lynn A Jansen1, Daruka Mahadevan2, Paul S Appelbaum3, William M P Klein4, Neil D Weinstein5, Motomi Mori6, Catherine Degnin7, Daniel P Sulmasy8.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Recent research has found unrealistic optimism (UO) among patient-subjects in early-phase oncology trials. Our aim was to investigate the cognitive and motivational factors that evoke this bias in this context. We expected perceptions of control to be a strong correlate of unrealistic optimism.
METHODS: A study of patient-subjects enrolled in early-phase oncology trials was conducted at two sites in the USA. Respondents completed questionnaires designed to assess unrealistic optimism and several risk attribute variables that have been found to evoke the bias in other contexts.
RESULTS: One hundred and seventy-one patient-subjects agreed to be interviewed for our study. Significant levels of perceived controllability were found with respect to all nine research-related questions. Perceptions of control were found to predict unrealistic optimism. Two other risk attribute variables, awareness of indicators (p=0.024) and mental image (p=0.022), were correlated with unrealistic optimism. However, in multivariate regression analysis, awareness and mental image dropped out of the model and perceived controllability was the only factor independently associated with unrealistic optimism (p<0.0001).
CONCLUSION: Patient-subjects reported that they can, at least partially, control the benefits they receive from participating in an early-phase oncology trial. This sense of control may underlie unrealistic optimism about benefiting personally from trial participation. Effective interventions to counteract unrealistic optimism may need to address the psychological factors that give rise to distorted risk/benefit processing. © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  decision making; early phase cancer trials; informed consent; perceived control; research ethics; unrealistic optimism

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28774957     DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2016-103724

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  6 in total

1.  Warmth and competence predict overoptimistic beliefs for out-group but not in-group members.

Authors:  Mihai Dricu; Stephanie Bührer; Fabienne Hesse; Cecily Eder; Andres Posada; Tatjana Aue
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-26       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Navigating choice in the face of uncertainty: using a theory informed qualitative approach to identifying potential patient barriers and enablers to participating in an early phase chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy trial.

Authors:  Gisell Castillo; Manoj M Lalu; Sarah Asad; Madison Foster; Natasha Kekre; Dean A Fergusson; Terry Hawrysh; Harold Atkins; Kednapa Thavorn; Joshua Montroy; Stuart Schwartz; Robert A Holt; Raewyn Broady; Justin Presseau
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Hematologists' barriers and enablers to screening and recruiting patients to a chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy trial: a theory-informed interview study.

Authors:  Gisell Castillo; Manoj Lalu; Sarah Asad; Madison Foster; Natasha Kekre; Dean Fergusson; Terry Hawrysh; Harold Atkins; Kednapa Thavorn; Joshua Montroy; Stuart Schwartz; Robert Holt; Raewyn Broady; Justin Presseau
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 2.279

4.  Assessing Parent Decisions About Child Participation in a Behavioral Health Intervention Study and Utility of Informed Consent Forms.

Authors:  Stephanie A Kraft; Kathryn M Porter; Devan M Duenas; Erin Sullivan; Maya Rowland; Brian E Saelens; Benjamin S Wilfond; Seema K Shah
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2020-07-01

5.  Comparison of Patient and Expert Perceptions of the Attainment of Research Milestones in Parkinson's Disease.

Authors:  Patrick Bodilly Kane; Daniel M Benjamin; Roger A Barker; Anthony E Lang; Todd Sherer; Jonathan Kimmelman
Journal:  Mov Disord       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 10.338

6.  Motivations and Decision-Making of Adult Sickle Cell Patients in High-Risk Clinical Research.

Authors:  Hae Lin Cho; Scott Y H Kim; Courtney Fitzhugh; Matthew Hsieh; John Tisdale; Christine Grady
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2020-03-19       Impact factor: 5.742

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.