| Literature DB >> 28774294 |
Adriano Barreto Nogueira1,2, Eva Annen3, Oliver Boss3, Faraneh Farokhzad3, Christopher Sikorski3, Emanuela Keller3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To assess whether circadian patterns of temperature correlate with further values of intracranial pressure (ICP) in severe brain injury treated with hypothermia.Entities:
Keywords: Circadian rhythm; Hypothermia; Intracranial pressure; Multimodality monitoring; Prediction; Temperature
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28774294 PMCID: PMC5543542 DOI: 10.1186/s12967-017-1272-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Transl Med ISSN: 1479-5876 Impact factor: 5.531
Clinical features
| Case # | Age | Gender | Aneurysm | Admission | Clinical assessment | Fisher grade | Recording in CNS monitor | GOS after 1 year |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 50 | F | ACoA | d4 | HH 2 | 3 | From d6 | 5 |
| 2 | 65 | F | ACoA | d4 | HH 4 | 4 | From d9 | 3 |
| 3 | 53 | F | ACoA | d0 | HH 3 | 4 | From d6 | 5 |
ACoA anterior communicating artery, CNS Component Neuromonitoring System, d day after bleeding, F female, GOS Glasgow outcome scale, HH Hunt and Hess scale, VS clinical vasospasm
Circadian patterns of temperature and intracranial pressure under hypothermia
| Case # | Day of T monitoring | Diurnal T | Nocturnal T | TV | Predicted ICP24 | ICP24 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | 33.1365 ± 0.1016 | 33.1805 ± 0.0897 | 0.882 | 18.5 (16.7–20.3) | 16.9 ± 3.6 |
| 1 | 2 | 33.0117 ± 0.212 | 33.1603 ± 0.0583 | 0.274 | 22.2 (20.3–24.1) | 24.2 ± 6.2 |
| 1 | 3 | 33.1089 ± 0.0634 | 33.1012 ± 0.021 | 0.331 | 21.9 (20–23.8) | 20.5 ± 3.8 |
| 1 | 4 | 33.111 ± 0.0361 | 33.1035 ± 0.0247 | 0.684 | 19.7 (17.9–21.5) | 20 ± 2.5 |
| 1 | 5 | 33.1142 ± 0.0388 | 33.1234 ± 0.0405 | 1.044 | 17.5 (15.7–19.3) | 20 ± 2.3 |
| 1 | 6 | 33.1145 ± 0.1375 | 33.0374 ± 0.0694 | 0.506 | 20.8 (19–22.6) | 24 ± 1.6 |
| 1 | 7 | 33.0858 ± 0.0476 | 33.0935 ± 0.0938 | 1.970 | 11.7 (9.8–13.6) | 13.7 ± 6.9 |
| 1 | 8 | 33.0643 ± 0.0342 | 33.0427 ± 0.0584 | 1.709 | 13.3 (11.5–15.2) | 11.5 ± 3.1 |
| 1 | 9 | 33.1612 ± 0.0859 | 33.4189 ± 0.1192 | 1.377 | 15.4 (13.6–17.2) | 15 ± 2.3 |
| 1 | 10 | 33.7116 ± 0.1166 | 34.2782 ± 0.2091 | 1.764 | 12.9 (11–14.7) | 14 ± 2.5 |
| 2 | 6 | 33.1231 ± 0.0954 | 33.0969 ± 0.0641 | 0.672 | 19.8 (18–21.6) | 20.8 ± 2.3 |
| 3 | 1 | 33.5335 ± 0.1086 | 33.5147 ± 0.0845 | 0.779 | 19.1 (17.3–20.9) | 16.8 ± 3.1 |
| 3 | 2 | 33.5118 ± 0.078 | 33.5112 ± 0.068 | 0.872 | 18.5 (16.8–20.3) | 14.9 ± 1.7 |
| 3 | 3 | 33.485 ± 0.0364 | 33.5293 ± 0.0555 | 1.523 | 14.5 (12.7–16.3) | 14.7 ± 2.4 |
| 3 | 4 | 33.4787 ± 0.0831 | 33.7156 ± 0.1312 | 1.568 | 14.2 (12.4–16) | 14.4 ± 2.4 |
| 3 | 5 | 34.0214 ± 0.1698 | 34.55 ± 0.1982 | 1.149 | 16.8 (15–18.6) | 15.9 ± 1.7 |
| 3 | 6 | 34.7498 ± 0.105 | 35.0813 ± 0.1652 | 1.558 | 14.3 (12.4–16) | 13.5 ± 2.6 |
Artifact occurred in 0–24% (mean 2.7%) of the time regarding temperature monitoring periods of 12 h (less than 15% of the time in 24 h) and in 0–4.7% (mean 1.1%) of the time regarding ICP24 monitoring periods. Note that usually the predicted ICP24 was similar to ICP24, and that the predicted interval of ICP24 encompassed ICP24
ICP mean intracranial pressure in mmHg across 24 h after temperature monitoring (80% prediction interval shown between parenthesis), T temperature (in °C), TV temperature variability
Fig. 1Temperature variability (TV) correlates inversely with mean intracranial pressure in the following day (ICP24) during hypothermia. Upper left-hand graph displays the distribution of the ICP24 in function of the TV from which derived the regression line and the formulas displayed above the graph. Upper right-hand graph displays daily TV and ICP24 of patients 1–3. Note that patient #2 underwent hypothermia during day 6 of monitoring. Broadly, the inverse of TV parallels ICP24. The remaining boxes display the daily temperature curves in degrees Celsius and the corresponding ICP curves in the following day. Temperature was recorded at 10 Hz and ICP at 1 Hz. Vertical line in the temperature curves corresponds to 18 h and divide the graph in day at left and night at right. Horizontal line in the ICP curves sets 20 mmHg. These graphs allow a qualitative analysis regarding temperature variability during day and night and ICP in the next 24 h. For example, compare the variability between day and night of days 6 and 8 of monitoring of patient #1 and the respective ICP values in the next day. CI confidence interval, D day of monitoring, PI prediction interval, arrows sudden ICP decrease due to cerebrospinal fluid drainage