| Literature DB >> 28773867 |
Zhiyong Ai1,2, Wei Sun3,4, Jinyang Jiang5,6, Dan Song7,8,9, Han Ma10, Jianchun Zhang11, Danqian Wang12,13.
Abstract
The electrochemical behaviour for pasEntities:
Keywords: chloride; corrosion-resistant steel; film composition; pH; passivation
Year: 2016 PMID: 28773867 PMCID: PMC5457108 DOI: 10.3390/ma9090749
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1Microstructure of Cr10Mo1 steel obtained by OM.
Figure 2Deconvolution of the Fe 2p3/2, Cr 2p3/2 and O 1s XPS spectra detected for the passive film on the steel after 7 d immersion in solution of pH 13.3 with 0.2 M Cl−: (a) Fe 2p3/2; (b) Cr 2p3/2; and (c) O 1s.
Figure 3Composition depth profiles obtained from XPS analysis for the surface films on the steel in solutions of different pH with 0.2 M Cl−: (a) pH 13.3; (b) pH 12.0; (c) pH 10.5; and (d) pH 9.0.
Figure 4Composition depth profiles obtained from XPS analysis for the surface films on the steel in solutions of different pH with 1.0 M Cl−: (a) pH 13.3; (b) pH 12.0; (c) pH 10.5; and (d) pH 9.0.
Figure 5Composition depth profiles obtained from XPS analysis for the surface films formed on the steel in solutions of different pH with 0.2 M Cl−: (a) Fehy/Feox; and (b) Crhy/Crox.
Figure 6Composition depth profiles obtained from XPS analysis for the surface films formed on the steel in solutions of different pH with 1.0 M Cl−: (a) Fehy/Feox; and (b) Crhy/Crox.
Figure 7Schematic illustration of the growth processes of passive films on alloy corrosion-resistant steel Cr10Mo1 in solutions with different pH and Cl− contents: (a) with pH 13.3 and 0.2 M Cl−; (b) with pH 13.3 and 1.0 M Cl−; (c) with pH 9.0 and 0.2 M Cl−; and (d) with pH 9.0 and 1.0 M Cl−.
Figure 8Mott-Shottky plots for passive films formed on the steel in solutions with different pH and Cl− contents at 7 d immersion: (a) 0.2 M; and (b) 1.0 M.
Effect of pH values and chloride contents on semiconducting properties of passive films formed on the steel.
| pH | 0.2 M | 1.0 M | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nd (1020 cm−3) | Na (1020 cm−3) | Nd (1020 cm−3) | Na (1020 cm−3) | |
| 13.3 | 29.65 | 36.53 | 49.11 | 41.26 |
| 12.0 | 18.21 | 19.72 | 45.90 | 43.47 |
| 10.5 | 16.41 | 14.61 | 59.51 | 68.28 |
| 9.0 | 15.98 | 12.54 | 63.26 | 78.02 |
Figure 9The corrosion potential (Ecorr) and polarization resistance (Rp) of the steel as a function of time in solutions of different pH with 0.2 M Cl−: (a) Ecorr; and (b) Rp.
Figure 10The corrosion potential (Ecorr) and polarization resistance (Rp) of the steel as a function of time in solutions of different pH with 1.0 M Cl−: (a) Ecorr; and (b) Rp.
Figure 11Measured EIS (in Nyquist and Bode forms) of the steel in solutions of different pH with 0.2 M Cl− after 7 d immersion: (a) Nyquist plots; and (b) Bode plots.
Figure 12Measured EIS (in Nyquist and Bode forms) of the steel in solutions of different pH with 1.0 M Cl− after 7 d immersion: (a) Nyquist plots; and (b) Bode plots.
Best fitting parameters for the experimental EIS of the steel in test solutions with different pH and Cl− contents after 7 d immersion.
| Cl− Contents (M) | pH | Rsol (Ω·cm2) | R1 (Ω·cm2) | CPE1 | R2 (Ω·cm2) | CPE2 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Y0 (Ω−1·cm−2·sn) | n | Y0 (Ω−1·cm−2·sn) | n | |||||
| 0.2 | 13.3 | 18.2 | 3.54 × 105 | 2.47 × 10−5 | 0.92 | 11.37 × 105 | 2.07 × 10−5 | 0.82 |
| 12.0 | 121.2 | 4.93 × 105 | 2.54 × 10−5 | 0.91 | 13.23 × 105 | 1.94 × 10−5 | 0.82 | |
| 10.5 | 106.3 | 6.84 × 105 | 2.75 × 10−5 | 0.90 | 15.62 × 105 | 1.85 × 10−5 | 0.80 | |
| 9.0 | 96.8 | 7.31 × 105 | 2.87 × 10−5 | 0.89 | 17.36 × 105 | 1.73 × 10−5 | 0.80 | |
| 1.0 | 13.3 | 11.8 | 2.96 × 105 | 2.58 × 10−5 | 0.91 | 8.85 × 105 | 2.23 × 10−5 | 0.81 |
| 12.0 | 35.7 | 2.31 × 105 | 2.91 × 10−5 | 0.90 | 6.13 × 105 | 2.07 × 10−5 | 0.81 | |
| 10.5 | 30.4 | 1.06 × 104 | 2.12 × 10−4 | 0.81 | 1.89 × 104 | 1.63 × 10−4 | 0.59 | |
| 9.0 | 23.2 | 3.21 × 103 | 2.93 × 10−4 | 0.79 | 9.76 × 103 | 2.41 × 10−4 | 0.53 | |
Figure 13SEM images of the steel surfaces immersed for 7 d in solutions with different pH and Cl− contents, and EDS spectra registered on the characteristic areas of SEM images.