| Literature DB >> 28773625 |
Baha I Elzaki1,2, Yue Jun Zhang3.
Abstract
Using ammonium nitrate (AN) as a propellant oxidizer is limited due to its hygroscopicity. This review consolidated the available information of various issues pertaining to the coating methods of the surface modification of ammonium nitrate for reducing its hygroscopicity. Moreover this review summarizes the recent advances and issues involved in ammonium nitrate surface modification by physical, chemical and encapsulation coating methods to reduce the hygroscopicity. Furthermore, coating materials, process conditions, and the hygroscopicity test conditions are extensively discussed along, with summaries of the advantages and disadvantages of each coating method. Our findings indicated that the investigation and development of anti-hygroscopicity of AN, and the mechanisms of surface modification by coating urgently require further research in order to further reduce the hygroscopicity. Therefore, this review is useful to researchers concerned with the improvement of ammonium salts' anti-hygroscopicity.Entities:
Keywords: ammonium nitrate; chemical coating; encapsulation coating; hygroscopicity; modification surface; physical coating
Year: 2016 PMID: 28773625 PMCID: PMC5456899 DOI: 10.3390/ma9070502
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1Formula of ammonium nitrate.
Figure 2Phase transitions of AN.
Figure 3Micro-structure of composite-modified water-resistant powdery AN.
Performance of coated AN using the physical coating method.
| No. | Year | Absorption Moisture Rate (%) | Mass Ratio of Coating Layer (%) | Absorption Moisture Test Condition | Decline of Absorption Moisture (%) | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2003 | 1.62% | 4% | T = 20 °C, RH = 83%, t = 48 h | 64.78% | [ |
| 2 | 2004 | 7% | 1% | T = 20 °C, RH = 65%, t = 96 h | 80% | [ |
| 3 | 2006 | 2.174% | 2.17% | T = 25 °C, RH = 90%, t = 8 h | 65.28% | [ |
| 4 | 2007 | 5.27% | - | T = 25 °C, RH = 90%, t = 30 h | 69.02% | [ |
| 5 | 2013 | 3.04% | 2.5% | T = 30 °C, RH = 90%, t = 24 h | 88% | [ |
Performance of coated AN using the chemical coating method.
| No. | Year | Absorption Moisture Rate | Mass Ratio of Coating Layer | Absorption Moisture Test Condition | Decline of Absorption Moisture | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2003 | 11.4% | - | T = 35 °C, RH = 92%, t = 24 h | 38.7% | [ |
| 2 | 2005 | 0.21% | 0.3% | T = 35 °C, RH = 55%, t = 24 h | 56.25% | [ |
| 3 | 2009 | 10.92% | - | T = 20 °C, RH = 88%, t = 8 h | 15.08% | [ |
Figure 4Monomer and polymeric particles adsorbed surface-coating schematic.
Performance of coated AN using the encapsulation coating method.
| No. | Year | Absorption Moisture Rate | Mass Ratio of Coating Layer | Absorption Moisture Test Condition | Decline of Absorption Moisture | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2003 | 9.91% | - | T = 32 °C, RH = 90%, t = 24 h | 22.50% | [ |
| 2 | 2004 | 2.8427% | 1.5% | T = 30 °C, RH = 94%, t = 8 h | 49% | [ |
| 3 | 2008 | 0.623% | - | T = 20 °C, RH = 75%, t = 12 h | 88% | [ |
| 4 | 2011 | 0.33% | - | T = 30 °C, RH = 75%, t = 24 h | 30.6% | [ |
| 5 | 2013 | 8.78% | 0.48% | T = 35 °C, RH = 92%, t = 24 h | 28.35% | [ |
Advantages and disadvantages of coating methods.
| Method | Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|---|
| Physical coating | Simple. Convenient and easy to manufacture. Improves the stability of the particles. Safety. Enhances the compatibility of particles with other materials. | Uses a large amount of coating agent. Thickness of coating layer not easy to control. Large difference of interfacial tension between the surface coating layer and the polarity of AN. |
| Chemical coating | Small dosage of coating agent. Strong binding force. The hydrophobic group made the thin layer on the surface prevent hygroscopicity. | The surfactant and coupling agent have low molecular weight. The surfactant has a small solubility in water. Low hygroscopicity properties. |
| Encapsulation coating | Improves the physical properties of coated particles on the surface. Protects the particles from external moisture. Polymer hygroscopicity was zero. Coating layer is thin. | The brittle polymer is susceptible to cracking during the drying process. There are sticky polymer adhesives not dispersed. Polymer polarity low is difficult to stick on surface of AN particles. |