| Literature DB >> 28772952 |
Xiang-Yun Lu1,2, Lan Chen3, Chuan-Yu Wu4, Hak-Kim Chan5, Tim Freeman6.
Abstract
The flowability and dispersion behavior are two important physicochemical properties of pharmaceutical formulations for dry powder inhalers (DPIs). They are usually affected by the environmental conditions, such as temperature and relative humidity (RH). However, very few studies have been focused on the relationship between the two properties and their dependence on RH during storage. In this research, model pharmaceutical formulations were prepared using mixtures of coarse and fine lactose. The fractions of fines in the mixtures were 0%, 5%, 10%, and 20%, respectively. These blends were stored at four different RH levels, 0%, 30%, 58%, and 85%, for 48 h. The FT4 Powder Rheometer was used to evaluate the powder flowability, and the Malvern Spraytec® laser diffraction system was employed to assess the powder dispersion performance. The results indicated that both the flow and dispersion properties of lactose blends deteriorate after being stored at 85% RH, but improved after being conditioned at 58% RH. The fine particle fractions (FPFs) of the blends with 5% and 10% fine fractions and the as-received coarse lactose decreased when they were conditioned at 30% RH. For the blend with 20% fine fraction, a high RH during storage (i.e., 85% RH) affected the dispersion property, but had a limited influence on its flowability, while, for the coarse lactose powder, the different RH conditions affected its flowability, but not the dispersion results. A strong correlation between the powder flowability and its dispersion performance was found.Entities:
Keywords: dispersion; dry powder inhalation; flowability; lactose; relative humidity
Year: 2017 PMID: 28772952 PMCID: PMC5553409 DOI: 10.3390/ma10060592
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1FT4 Powder Rheometer (a); flow energy measurement method (b) and permeability measurement method (c).
Figure 2Flow energy for the treated samples with fine fractions (a) 0 wt. %; (b) 5 wt. %; (c) 10 wt. %; and (d) 20 wt. % at various relative humidities.
Figure 3Flow properties obtained from the dynamic test with downward anti-clockwise and upward clockwise motion (error bars represent standard deviations, n = 3): (a) Normalised Basic Flow Energy (BFENorm); (b) Specific Energy (SE); (c) Flow Rate Index (FRI).
Figure 4The relationship between the pressure drop across the powder bed and applied normal stress for blends with fine lactose fraction of (a) 0 wt. %; (b) 5 wt. %; (c) 10 wt. %; (d) 20 wt. %.
Figure 5Changes in fine particle fractions (FPFs) (cut-off diameter equals to 8.4 μm) for blends of different fine fractions at various relative humidities.
Figure 6The relationship between FPF and BFENorm values of all the blends being treated at different RH levels.