| Literature DB >> 28772804 |
Mercedes Paulina Chávez-Díaz1,2, María Lorenza Escudero-Rincón3, Elsa Miriam Arce-Estrada4, Román Cabrera-Sierra5.
Abstract
In an effort to examine the effect of the microstructurclass="Chemical">al changes of theEntities:
Keywords: Ti6Al4V; biomaterials; heat treatment; microstructure; osteoblasts; titanium oxide
Year: 2017 PMID: 28772804 PMCID: PMC5506940 DOI: 10.3390/ma10040445
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1Micrographs of the following alloys: (a) Ti6Al4V as received; (b) Ti6Al4V800 treated at 800 °C; (c) Ti6Al4V1050 treated at 1050 °C.
Figure 2X-ray diffraction patterns (XRD) for Ti6Al4V alloys.
Figure 3XPS spectra of Ti, O and Al measured at a surface for Ti6Al4V as received (a,b), Ti6Al4V800 (c–e) and (f–h) Ti6Al4V1050.
Oxide film thickness calculated using Strohmeier equation.
| Sample | dTiO2 (nm) |
|---|---|
| Ti6Al4V as received | 2.1 |
| Ti6Al4V800 | 4.8 |
| Ti6Al4V1050 | 5.0 |
Figure 4Corrosion potential (Ecorr) measurements of Ti6Al4V as received and heat-treated alloys over immersion time in the culture medium with osteoblasts cells.
Figure 5Nyquist plots (Zimag vs. Zreal) of the (a) Ti6Al4V as received; (b) Ti6Al4V800 and (c) Ti6Al4V1050 with the time in the culture medium with osteoblasts cells.
Figure 6Bode plots (Modulus vs. Frequency and |Z| Phase angle vs. Frequency) recorded for Ti6Al4V as received (a,d), Ti6Al4V800 (b,e) and Ti6Al4V1050 (c,f) through the immersion time in the culture medium with osteoblasts cells.
Figure 7Equivalent circuits proposed for the fit of all impedance plots obtained for Ti6Al4V as received, Ti6Al4V800 and Ti6Al4V1050 alloys (a) without cells and (b) with osteoblastic cells.
Parameter values obtained after the fitting of the EIS diagrams using the Boukamp program.
| Sample | Time Days | Re (Ω cm2) | Rextra (Ω cm2) | Qcell (Siemens sn) (cm−2) | Rf (Ω cm2) | Qf (Siemens sn) (cm−2) | χ2 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ti6Al4V as received | 0 | 57.74 | --- | --- | --- | 1.91 × 107 | 3.19 × 10−5 | 0.862 | 9.9 × 10−3 |
| 1 | 46.13 | 381.2 | 2.82 × 10−5 | 0.887 | 1.78 × 107 | 6.14 × 10−6 | 0.940 | 2.4 × 10−3 | |
| 7 | 50.78 | 146.7 | 2.69 × 10−5 | 0.900 | 1.76 × 107 | 6.77 × 10−6 | 0.958 | 2.3 × 10−3 | |
| Ti6Al4V800 | 0 | 61.11 | --- | --- | --- | 1.75 × 107 | 2.25 × 10−5 | 0.882 | 5.6 × 10−3 |
| 1 | 62.66 | 292.9 | 2.19 × 10−5 | 0.896 | 1.79 × 107 | 2.06 × 10−7 | 0.907 | 2.4 × 10−3 | |
| 7 | 58.29 | 105 | 2.14 × 10−5 | 0.909 | 1.89 × 107 | 2.83 × 10−7 | 0.919 | 2.2 × 10−3 | |
| Ti6Al4V1050 | 0 | 51.20 | --- | --- | --- | 2.10 × 107 | 2.20 × 10−5 | 0.913 | 6.6 × 10−3 |
| 1 | 53.31 | 166.3 | 2.05 × 10−5 | 0.927 | 1.99 × 107 | 2.89 × 10−7 | 0.939 | 2.7 × 10−3 | |
| 7 | 57.82 | 109.6 | 1.82 × 10−5 | 0.936 | 2.19 × 107 | 2.81 × 10−7 | 0.957 | 1.9 × 10−3 |
Figure 8Overview of osteoblasts adhered and EDX analysis to Ti6Al4V as received (a,b,g), Ti6Al4V800 (c,d,h) and Ti6Al4V1050 (e,f,i) after 7 days of immersion in DMEM at 10% of FBS.