| Literature DB >> 28772584 |
Qiong Zhang1, Xiaohe Tian2, Hongping Zhou3, Jieying Wu4, Yupeng Tian5.
Abstract
The application of two-photon absorption (2PA) materials is a classical research field and has recently attracted increasing interest. It has generated a demand for new dyes with highEntities:
Keywords: metal complexes; organic fluorophores; organic-inorganic nanohybrids; two-photon fluorescence microscopy
Year: 2017 PMID: 28772584 PMCID: PMC5503390 DOI: 10.3390/ma10030223
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1Experimental setup for the Z-scan experiment.
Figure 2Experimental setup for two-photon fluorescence intensity at different excitation wavelengths.
Figure 3Molecular structures of 1–10.
Photophysical data of 1–10.
| Compounds | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 471 | 603 | 621 | 1064 | 134 | |
| 482 | 601 | 627 | 1064 | 122 | |
| 486 | 604 | 627 | 1064 | 136 | |
| 486 | 605 | 625 | 1064 | 123 | |
| 426 | 521 | 586 | 760 | 14.8 | |
| 340 | 585 | 615 | 750 | 309 | |
| 480 | 603 | 598 | 960 | 48 | |
| 485 | 606 | 598 | 960 | 57 | |
| 474 | 597 | 600 | 960 | 115 | |
| 472 | 595 | 620 | 960 | 517 |
a Absorption peak position in nm (1 × 10−5 mol·L−1); b Peak position of SPEF (Single Photon Excited Fluorescence) in nm (1.0 × 10−5 mol·L−1), excited at the absorption maximum; c 2PEF (Two-Photon Excited Fluorescence) peak position in nm pumped by femtosecond laser pulses at their maximum excitation wavelength; d 2PA (Two-Photon Absorption) maximum excitation wavelength; e 2PA cross section in GM Göppert-Mayer units (1GM = 10−50 cm4s·photons−1·molecule−1). Solvent: DMF (Dimethyl Formamide).
Figure 4The molecular structures of 11–21.
Photophysical data of 11–21.
| Compounds | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 380 | 457 | 495 | 720 | 8 | |
| 402 | 443 | 483 | 740 | 10 | |
| 452 | 566 | 572 | 820 | 498 | |
| 406 | 520 | 570 | 800 | 104 | |
| 416 | 529 | 550 | 870 | 151 | |
| 471 | 573 | 600 | 830 | 1319 | |
| 460 | 569 | 590 | 800 | 1885 | |
| 480 | 630 | 610 | 820 | 375 | |
| 451 | 600 | 590 | 840 | 216 | |
| 458 | 561 | 560 | 840 | 742 | |
| 459 | 561 | 562 | 840 | 170 |
a Absorption peak position in nm (1 × 10−5 mol·L−1); b Peak position of SPEF in nm (1.0 × 10−5 mol·L−1), excited at the absorption maximum; c 2PEF peak position in nm pumped by femtosecond laser pulses at their maximum excitation wavelength; d 2PA maximum excitation wavelength; e 2PA cross section in GM. Solvent: DMF.
Figure 5(a) One and two-photon florescence image of HepG2 cells with 18 in the presence of Fe3+ (λex = 840 nm, emission wavelength from 575 to 675 nm); (b) One and two-photon florescence image of HepG2 cells with 18 in the presence of Fe3+ and EDTA (λex = 840 nm, emission wavelength from 575 to 675 nm); (c) One and two-photon florescence image of HepG2 cells with 19 in the presence of Cu2+ (λex = 820 nm, emission wavelength from 575 to 675 nm); (d) One and two-photon florescence image of HepG2 cells with 19 in the presence of Cu2+ and EDTA (λex = 820 nm, emission wavelength from 575 to 675 nm); (e–h) Normalized fluorescence intensity analysis corresponding to (a–d), cell number n = 30, one-way ANOVA was used for statistical analysis for independent experiments, p < 0.005.
Figure 6The molecule structures of 22–49.
Photophysical data of 22–49.
| Compounds | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 286, 357 | 487 | 525 | 720 | 434 | |
| 276, 327, 406 | - | - | 760 (Z-scan) | 415 (Z-scan) | |
| 276, 327, 409 | - | - | 760 (Z-scan) | 462 (Z-scan) | |
| 277, 352 | 446 | 495 | 720 | 179 | |
| 286, 369 | 526 | 575 | 750 | 70 | |
| 285, 370 | 485 | 580 | 750 | 295 | |
| 285, 375 | 487 | 574 | 750 | 308 | |
| 338, 429 | 494 | - | 690 (Z-scan) | 7938 (Z-scan) | |
| 294, 526 | 526 | 562 | 720 | 2869 | |
| 290, 360 | 505 | 520 | 840 | 1019 | |
| 370 | 470 | 500 | 690 | 327 | |
| 412 | 500 | 550 | 700 | 394 | |
| 347, 438 | 570 | 605 | 940 | 660 | |
| 349, 449 | 583 | 608 | 940 | 999 | |
| 348, 484 | 591 | 613 | 860 | 1830 | |
| 350, 497 | 602 | 620 | 880 | 2087 | |
| 355, 484 | 596 | 623 | 860 | 5382 | |
| 355, 499 | 602 | 629 | 860 | 9398 | |
| 295, 410 | 548 | 566 | 890 | 121 | |
| 297, 442 | 569 | 603 | 890 | 138 | |
| 374 | 417 | 442 | 720 | 220 | |
| 374 | 478 | 528 | 700 | 777 | |
| 396 | 517 | 536 | 780 | 623 | |
| 387 | 498 | 527 | 780 | 595 | |
| 387 | 495 | 510 | 780 | 285 | |
| 398 | 509 | 522 | 780 | 392 | |
| 397 | 505 | 530 | 780 | 287 | |
| 388 | 503 | 523 | 780 | 190 |
a Absorption peak position in nm (1 × 10−5 mol·L−1); b Peak position of SPEF in nm (1.0 × 10−5 mol·L−1), excited at the absorption maximum; c 2PEF peak position in nm pumped by femtosecond laser pulses at their maximum excitation wavelength; d 2PA maximum excitation wavelength; e 2PA cross section in GM. Solvent: DMF.
Figure 7(a) The structure of 50 (b) Two-photon (200 fs, 76 MHz Ti: sapphire laser) absorption cross section (δ) of 50 in DMF versus excitation wavelengths with 380 mw power (c) 2PEF image of HeLa cells with excitation at 800 nm.
Figure 8The synthesis route of S-Au NPs (51).
Open- and closed-aperture Z-scan measurement data for the third-order nonlinearity parameters of S, S-Au NPs (51) in DMF with 10−3 M concentration.
| Non-linearity Parameters | S | S-Au NPs | Au NPs |
|---|---|---|---|
| 790 | 790 | 790 | |
| 0.11 | 0.14 | 0.069 | |
| 4595 | 5849 | 2874 | |
| 4.62 | 5.19 | - | |
| Re( | 2.40 | 2.69 | - |
| Im( | 3.59 | 4.60 | - |
a Best nonlinear absorption wavelength.
Figure 9(a) Schematic representation of the preparation progress of dye-concentrated nanoparticles (DCNs) (52); (b) 2PA cross section of dye and DCNs in DMF versus excitation wavelengths from 720 nm to 860 nm in DMF.
Figure 10(a) Schematic representation of L; (b) SEM (Scanning electron microscope) micrograph of L nanorods prepared from EG (ethylene Glycol) solution; (c) SEM micrograph of the nanohybrid (53); (d) Two-photon fluorescence Image of HepG2 cells incubated with 20 μm of 53 for 30 min, then washed with PBS. λex = 760 nm (emission wavelength from 520 to 562 nm).
Open- and closed-aperture Z-scan measurement data for the nonlinearity parameters of L nanorods and the nanohybrid 53.
| Non-Linearity Parameters | L Nanorods | Nanohybrid 53 |
|---|---|---|
| 800 | 840 | |
| 0.58 | 1.60 | |
| 1353 | 5731 | |
| 5.81 × 10−16 | 1.10 × 10−14 | |
| Re( | 3.01 × 10−14 | 5.70 × 10−13 |
| Im( | 1.07 × 10−7 | 5.07 × 10−7 |
a Best nonlinear absorption wavelength.
Figure 11The structures of ligands HTHA (4,4,4-trifluoro-1-(9-hexylcarbazole-3-yl)-1,3-butanedione) and HCUR (1,7-bis(4-hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl)-1,6-heptadiene-3,5-dione) and its rare earth complexes 54–56.
Figure 12(a) 2PA cross sections (δ) for Eu(THA)3Phen (54); (b) Two-photon-excited fluorescence (2PEF) of HTHA and Eu(THA)3Phen (54) in DCM (1 × 10−3 mol·L−1); (c) Live cellular image based on Eu(THA)3Phen (54), MCF-7 cells were incubated with 200 μM complex for 1 hour, then imaged by two-photon microscopy (excitation wavelength λ = 770 nm, emission wavelength λ = 613 nm) without fixation. Note that cell cytosol staining is clearly emerging in higher concentration; in contrast cell nucleus and nucleoli luminescence is more significant in low concentration. All the scale bars represent 10 mm.
Figure 13(a) Two-photon-excited fluorescence (2PEF) of HCUR, 55 and 56 in DMF (1 × 10−3 mol·L−1); (b) 2PA cross sections (δ) for HCUR, 55 and 56; (c) The fluorescent imaging of the MCF-7 cells labeled with the 55 (green) and PI (red) at different times under continuous light exposure (all the scale bars represent 10 μm).
Figure 14Molecular structures of Ru(II) polypyridyl complexes 57–61.
Open- and closed-aperture Z-scan measurement data for the third-order nonlinear parameters of 57–61.
| Non-linearity Parameters | 57 | 58 | 59 | 60 | 61 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 730 | 730 | 740 | 730 | 730 | |
| 0.086 | 0.105 | 0.032 | 0.049 | 0.083 | |
| 3888 | 4747 | 1427 | 2228 | 3766 | |
| 8.12 | 5.02 | 4.30 | 5.25 | 7.09 | |
| Re( | 4.51 | 2.79 | 2.39 | 2.92 | 3.94 |
| Im( | 2.78 | 3.39 | 1.05 | 1.59 | 2.69 |
a Best nonlinear absorption wavelength.
Figure 15(a) Molecular structures of 62; (b) 2PA cross-sections of 62 in DMSO (dimethylsulphoxide) solution (c = 1 × 10−3 mol·L−1); (c) 2PFM of HepG2 cells co-labeled with 52 and Mitotracker.
Figure 16(a) Molecular structure of 63 (b) Dispersion of δ for 63. The fit lines are of limited reliability due to the 25 nm separation between the data points.
Figure 17The structures of 64–68.
Open-aperture Z-Scan measurement data for the third-order nonlinear parameters of 64–70 in DMF.
| Compound | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| L | 306,394 | 491,561 | 14 | 5.8 |
| 310,396 | 492,564 | 49 | 20 | |
| 315,397 | 494,562 | 51 | 21 | |
| 326,401 | 496,564 | 45 | 19 | |
| 308,396 | 499,572 | 38 | 15 | |
| 311,397 | 495,572 | 34 | 14 | |
| 320,301 | 491,571 | 47 | 19 | |
| 320,400 | 491,570 | 43 | 18 |
Linear absorption maxima (nm); Linear emission maxima (in nm, under the excitation wavelength of 310 nm).
Figure 18The structures of 71–78 and two-photon absorption cross-sections of L and its complexes 71–78 in DMF.
Figure 19(a) The structures of 79, 80; Open-aperture Z-scan experimental data and fitting curves for 79 (b), 80 (c) and their free ligands in H2O–acetonitrile (4:1) under a 750 nm laser beam. The concentration was 1.0 × 10−3 M.
Figure 20(a) Synthetic route for ligand L and complexes LZnCl2 (81), LZnBr2 (82), LZnI2 (83), and LZn(SCN)2 (84); (b) Theoretical curves of representative open-aperture Z-scan traces at wavelengths corresponding to a maximum nonlinear absorption for L, LZnCl2 (81), LZnBr2 (82), LZnI2 (83), and LZn(SCN)2 (84) at 850 nm.
Figure 21(a) Molecular structures of the ligands (L) and its metal complexes (85); (b) 2PA spectra of L and related complex 85; (c) Two-photon image of HepG2 cells incubated with 40 μM, λex = 700 nm (emission wavelength from 543 to 606 nm) and One-photon image of HepG2 cells incubated with ER tracker, λex = 488 nm (emission wavelength from 500 to 550 nm); (d) One-photon image of 72 h-zebrafish larva incubated with 30 μM after 4 h of incubation, washed by PBS buffer, λex = 405 nm (emission wavelength from 440 to 480 nm).
Figure 22(a) Molecular structures of the ligand (L) and its metal complex (86); (b) 2PA spectra of L and related complex 86.
Figure 23(a) Anaesthetized Larval zebrafish bath with 86 (100 nM) for 24 h under UV light (left) and 3D micrographs (thickness = 356.2 μm) under two-photon confocal microscopy in larval zebrafish brain and retina at 4 and 24 h; (c) Whole brain region imaging of staining larval zebrafish by 86 co-stained with DAPI (4,6-diamino-2-phenyl indole), insert: DIC tile scanning of the imaged larval zebrafish; (d) Braco-stained with DAPI, Syto9 and Propidium Iodide; (b) Fluorescence intensity analysis of uptake of 86 in sections of staining adult zebrafish by 86 co-stained with DAPI; (e) Ex vivo assessment of 86 following i.v. injection in mice co-labeled with DAPI and Alexa488-lectin, and zoom in (200×) micrographs show the detail of brain capillaries imaged by confocal laser scanning microscopy, with strong internalization of 86 with brain endothelium and CNS (central nervous system) cells at nuclear and plasma membrane. The scale bar represents 200 μm. Error bars: SEM (scanning electron microscope), n = 3. Abbreviations: Re = retina, B = brain, J = jaw, FI = fin.
Figure 24(a) Synthesis of two bis-β-diketones H2L1, H2L2 and their complexes 87–98; (b) 2PA spectra of all the compounds (c = 0.1 mM) in THF.
Figure 25Fluorescent imaging of two-photon microscopy of MCF-7 cells, λex = 720 nm, from left to right: H2L1, H2L2, 87, and 93 (all the scale bars represent 10 μm).
Figure 26(a) Molecular structures of Cu4I4L4 (99); (b) Two-photon absorption action spectra of L and Cu4I4L4 (99) in ethanol (c = 1.0 × 10−4 mol·L−1).
Figure 272PFM of MCF-7 at: (a) Containing Cu4I4L4 (99) (mid red) with DAPI (left blue) and overlay image (right); (b) Co-localization micrograph profile prove that the co-staining region corresponding to the white colocalization part which is located in the nuclear section; (c) Cell chromosome through progression of m-phase shows cellular luminescence by uptake cluster; (d) Containing L (mid red) with DPAI (left blue) and overlay image; (e) 3D intensity profile of DAPI, Cu4I4L4 (99) (200 μM) and L (200 μM) luminescence across a MCF-7 single cell after incubation for 2 h. (All scale bars represent 10 μM.)
Figure 28(a) Synthesis of the organotin carboxylate derivatives LCOOH, 100, and 101; (b) 2PA spectra of LCOOH, 100, and 101.
Figure 29(a) Synthetic routes for L1 and complexes 102, 103, 104; (b) 2PA cross-sections of L1 and complexes 102–104 in CH2Cl2 solution; (c) Inhibitory concentration IC50 (μM) of 102–104 against tumor cell lines.