| Literature DB >> 28772395 |
Di Wang1, Yimeng Wang2, Shibiao Wu3, Hui Lin4, Yongqiang Yang5, Shicai Fan6, Cheng Gu7, Jianhua Wang8, Changhui Song9.
Abstract
In pelvic fracture operations, bone plate shaping is challenging and the operation time is long. To address this issue, a customized bone plate was designed and produced using selective laser melting (SLM) technology. The key steps of this study included designing the customized bone plate, metal 3D printing, vacuum heat treatment, surface post-processing, operation rehearsal, and clinical application and evaluation. The joint surface of the bone plate was placed upwards with respect to the build platform to keep it away from the support and to improve the quality of the joint surface. Heat conduction was enhanced by adding a cone-type support beneath the bone plate to prevent low-quality fabrication due to poor heat conductivity of the Ti-6Al-4V powder. The residual stress was eliminated by exposing the SLM-fabricated titanium-alloy bone plate to a vacuum heat treatment. Results indicated that the bone plate has a hardness of HV1 360-HV1 390, an ultimate tensile strength of 1000-1100 MPa, yield strength of 900-950 MPa, and an elongation of 8%-10%. Pre-operative experiments and operation rehearsal were performed using the customized bone plate and the ABC-made pelvic model. Finally, the customized bone plate was clinically applied. The intraoperative C-arm and postoperative X-ray imaging results indicated that the customized bone plate matched well to the damaged pelvis. The customized bone plate fixed the broken bone and guides pelvis restoration while reducing operation time to about two hours. The customized bone plate eliminated the need for preoperative titanium plate pre-bending, thereby greatly reducing surgical wounds and operation time.Entities:
Keywords: Ti-6Al-4V; bone plate; metal additive manufacturing; pelvic fracture; selective laser melting
Year: 2017 PMID: 28772395 PMCID: PMC5344552 DOI: 10.3390/ma10010035
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1Key procedures in designing customized bone plate: (a) CT data model of pelvis; (b) Generation of pelvic model; (c) Fabrication of the initial shape; (d) Determination of the shape and thickness of the bone plate; (e) Modeling of the screw holes; and (f) The final bone plate model.
Figure 2Principle of SLM manufacturing and the experimental DiMetal-100 equipment. (a) Principle of SLM manufacturing; and (b) DiMetal-100.
Comparison between compositions of SLM fabricating powder and standard powder (part of the composition data obtained from reference [22]).
| Element | Composition (%) | ASTMF2924 (%) [ | Element | Composition (%) | ASTMF2924 (%) [ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Al | 6.0 | 5.50–6.75 | N | 0.012 | <0.05 |
| V | 3.90 | 3.50–4.50 | H | 0.0022 | <0.015 |
| Fe | 0.044 | <0.3 | Y | 0 | <0.005 |
| O | 0.10 | <0.2 | Ti | Balance | Balance |
| C | 0.013 | <0.08 | other | <0.03 | <0.4 |
Figure 3The SEM image of Ti6Al4V powder having the size of 500 mesh.
Figure 4Schematic diagram of the laser scanning and track overlapping.
The optimized SLM fabricating parameters.
| Laser Power (W) | Scanning Speed (mm/s) | Scanning Space (µm) | Layer Thickness (µm) | Spot Diameter (µm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 150 | 600 | 80 | 40 | 70 |
Figure 5Orientation placement of the customized bone plate and addition of support (Magics 16.0).
Figure 6Customized bone plate after SLM fabrication.
Mechanical properties of 3D printed part.
| Comparision Items | Ultimate Tensile Strength (MPa) | Yield Strength (MPa) | Elongation (%) | Hardness (HV1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3D printing (before heat treatment) | 1288.70 ± 6.44 | 1063.99 ± 5.32 | 6.43 ± 0.03 | 373 ± 1.9 |
| 3D printing (after heat treatment) | 1081.42 ± 5.41 | 925.26 ± 4.63 | 8.11 ± 0.04 | 367 ± 1.9 |
| standard cast part [ | >895 | >825 | >6 | 320 |
Figure 7Surface treatment and pre-operative simulation: (a) Customized bone plate after surface post-treatment; and (b) The match between bone plate and pelvic model.
Figure 8Clinical operation of the 3D-printed pelvic bone plate. (a) The first stage of the surgery; (b) The placement of the customized Bone Plate.
Figure 9Examination of fixation effect of the bone plate during and after the operation: (a) C-arm image during operation; and (b) X-ray image following surgery.
Figure 10The other three successive clinical cases application process from design, metal 3D printing to clinical operation. (a) The second case; (b) The third case; (c) The fourth case.