| Literature DB >> 28771547 |
Jintu Dutta1, Debajit Thakur1.
Abstract
Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) are studied in different agricultural crops but the interaction of PGPR of tea crop is not yet studied well. In the present study, the indigenous tea rhizobacteria were isolated from seven tea estates of Darjeeling located in West Bengal, India. A total of 150 rhizobacterial isolates were screened for antagonistic activity against six different fungal pathogens i.e. Nigrospora sphaerica (KJ767520), Pestalotiopsis theae (ITCC 6599), Curvularia eragostidis (ITCC 6429), Glomerella cingulata (MTCC 2033), Rhizoctonia Solani (MTCC 4633) and Fusarium oxysporum (MTCC 284), out of which 48 isolates were antagonist to at least one fungal pathogen used. These 48 isolates exhibited multifarious antifungal properties like the production of siderophore, chitinase, protease and cellulase and also plant growth promoting (PGP) traits like IAA production, phosphate solubilization, ammonia and ACC deaminase production. Amplified ribosomal DNA restriction analysis (ARDRA) and BOX-PCR analysis based genotyping clustered the isolates into different groups. Finally, four isolates were selected for plant growth promotion study in two tea commercial cultivars TV-1 and Teenali-17 in nursery conditions. The plant growth promotion study showed that the inoculation of consortia of these four PGPR isolates significantly increased the growth of tea plant in nursery conditions. Thus this study underlines the commercial potential of these selected PGPR isolates for sustainable tea cultivation.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28771547 PMCID: PMC5542436 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182302
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Map showing the location of sample collection sites.
Location, soil type and number of bacteria isolated from tea rhizosphere soil samples collected from the tea estate of Darjeeling.
| Tea estates | Location | Soil type (USDA) | pH | CFU g-1 range | Number of isolates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gielle tea estate | 27°00′52.27″N 88°23′10.47″E, Elevation 871 m | Sandy loam | 4.3 | 6×104−3 ×106 | 20 |
| Teesta Valley tea estate | 27°00′44.55″N 88°24′16.92″E, Elevation 1006 m | Sandy loam | 4.1 | 5×104−2×106 | 21 |
| Barnesbeg tea estate | 27°06′10.63″N 88°15′53.30″E, Elevation 850 m | Sandy loam | 4.5 | 4×104–3.2×106 | 20 |
| Rangli-Rangliot tea estate | 27°01′27.60″N 88°21′17.90″E, Elevation 1336 m | Sandy loam and clay | 4.2 | 4×104−1.2 ×106 | 15 |
| Namring tea estate | 27°00′50.83″N 88°22′12.24″E, Elevation 1011 m | Sandy loam | 4.4 | 4×104−2 ×106 | 18 |
| North-Tukvar tea estate | 27°05′42.53″N 88°15′29.83″E, Elevation 975 m | Sandy loam, silty | 4.6 | 8×104−5 ×106 | 32 |
| Ging tea estate | 27°04′30.23″N 88°17′58.67″E, Elevation 1066 m | Sandy loam | 4.2 | 4×104−2 ×106 | 24 |
Fig 2Venn diagram representation of rhizobacterial isolates showing antagonistic activity against fungal pathogens.
The Venn diagram shows the distribution of 48 antagonistic rhizobacterial isolates into 6 profiles which are representing the 6 test fungal pathogens. (*2 isolates showed antagonistic activity against all the test fungal pathogens) (See S1 Table).
Screening of selected rhizobacteria for PGP and antifungal traits.
| Sl No | Strain code | PGP traits | Antifungal traits | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IAA production (μg mL-1) | Phosphate solubilization (μg mL-1) | Ammonia production (μmol mL-1) | ACC deaminase activity | Siderophore production (%) | Chitinase activity | Cellulase activity | Protease activity | Chitinase gene | ||
| 1 | TTD1 | 21.2 ± 0.2 | 107.1 ± 0.1 | 2.3 ± 0.1 | 22.9± 0.3 | |||||
| 2 | TTD2 | 15.2 ± 0.2 | 176.8 ± 0.1 | 5.6 ± 0.3 | 28.5% ± 0.5 | |||||
| 3 | TTD3 | 13.7 ± 1.4 | 108.9 ± 0.1 | 5.6 ± 0.1 | 20% ± 2.4 | |||||
| 4 | TTD5 | 20.6 ± 0 | 187.3 ± 0.2 | 5.4 ± 0.1 | 45.3± 0.3 | |||||
| 5 | TTD7 | 73.1 ± 0.2 | 187.7 ± 0.1 | 6 ± 0.2 | 37.7% ± 0 | |||||
| 6 | TTD8 | 28.1 ± 0.8 | 67.2 ± 0.2 | 5.7 ± 0.2 | 12% ± 0.3 | |||||
| 7 | TTD10 | 16.4 ± 0.2 | 121.4 ± 0 | 5.9 ± 0.1 | 22.8% ± 0.2 | |||||
| 8 | TTD14 | 33.3 ± 0.2 | 155.9 ± 0.1 | 5.1 ± 0.2 | 24.7% ± 0.9 | |||||
| 9 | TTD15 | 37.6 ± 1.9 | 112.5 ± 0.1 | 5.9 ± 0.1 | 44.5% ± 2.4 | |||||
| 10 | TTD16 | 17.2 ± 0.7 | 68 ± 0 | 5.9 ± 0.2 | 22.9% ± 0.3 | |||||
| 11 | TTD19 | 57.8 ± 2 | 242.7 ± 0.2 | 4.5 ± 0.2 | 22.2% ± 0.3 | |||||
| 12 | TTD21 | 11.4 ± 0.8 | 89.3 ± 0.1 | 6 ± 0 | 23.3% ± 0.3 | |||||
| 13 | BT2 | 24.6 ± 1.6 | 175.2 ± 0.1 | 5.7 ± 0.1 | 24.5% ± 2.5 | |||||
| 14 | BT4 | 18.6 ± 0.4 | 47.9 ± 0.1 | 5.8 ± 0.2 | 23.5% ± 1.3 | |||||
| 15 | BT6 | 28.7 ± 1.4 | 158.3 ± 0.1 | 6 ± 0.3 | 30.2% ± 1 | |||||
| 16 | BT13 | 13.4 ± 0.2 | 123.6 ± 0.1 | 5.9 ± 0.4 | 18.8% ± 1.1 | |||||
| 17 | BT15 | 27.6 ± 2.2 | 143.8 ± 0.1 | 5.3 ± 0.1 | 28.8% ± 1.1 | |||||
| 18 | BT19 | 23.9 ± 0.8 | 119.2 ± 0.1 | 5.9 ± 0.4 | 35.5% ± 3.3 | |||||
| 19 | BT20 | 14.6 ± 1.6 | 57.2 ± 0.1 | 5.8 ± 0.3 | 25.7% ± 1.4 | |||||
| 20 | BT22 | 29.8 ± 0.3 | 102.2 ± 0 | 5.8 ± 0.2 | 21% ± 2.4 | |||||
| 21 | GN2 | 17.3 ± 0.3 | 113.7 ± 0.1 | 5.6 ± 0.2 | 26% ± 2.9 | |||||
| 22 | GN6 | 26.6 ± 0.1 | 76.2 ± 0.2 | 5.4 ± 0.2 | 43.3% ± 2.3 | |||||
| 23 | GN9 | 12.8 ± 0.8 | 181.4 ± 0.1 | 5.5 ± 0.2 | 18.1% ± 0.1 | |||||
| 24 | GN10 | 26.3 ± 0.2 | 89.2 ± 0 | 5.3 ± 0.1 | 18.5% ± 0.5 | |||||
| 25 | GN14 | 47.7 ± 2.1 | 254.7 ± 0.1 | 5.5 ± 0.4 | 39.7% ± 2.3 | |||||
| 26 | GN17 | 15.1 ± 0 | 122.9 ± 0.1 | 5.5 ± 0.4 | 18.5% ± 0.5 | |||||
| 27 | GT4 | 12.8 ± 1 | 115.9 ± 0 | 6 ± 0 | 17.9% ± 1.3 | |||||
| 28 | GT7 | 37.2 ± 0.6 | 245.9 ± 0.1 | 6 ± 0.1 | 27.4% ± 0.8 | |||||
| 29 | GT12 | 16.4 ± 0.3 | 230.7 ± 0.2 | 5.4 ± 0.2 | 18.1% ± 0.1 | |||||
| 30 | GT15 | 14.2 ± 0.8 | 137.2 ± 0.1 | 5.7 ± 0.5 | 18.1% ± 0.1 | |||||
| 31 | GT20 | 36.1 ± 0.8 | 180 ± 0.1 | 5.8 ± 0.2 | 27.9% ± 0.1 | |||||
| 32 | GT22 | 9.9 ± 0.8 | 166.5 ± 0.1 | 5.8 ± 0.3 | 22.2% ± 0.3 | |||||
| 33 | GT32 | 34.3 ± 1.7 | 204.9 ± 0.1 | 5.4 ± 0.3 | 20% ± 0.9 | |||||
| 34 | GT33 | 31.8 ± 0.1 | 120.8 ± 0 | 6 ± 0.1 | 18.3% ± 2.4 | |||||
| 35 | GT34 | 26.3 ± 0.3 | 167.7 ± 0.1 | 5.4 ± 0.4 | 22.8% ± 0.2 | |||||
| 36 | GT35 | 15.1 ± 0 | 100.8 ± 0.1 | 5.9 ± 0.2 | 22.5% ± 0.2 | |||||
| 37 | TV1 | 57.9 ± 0.5 | 186.8 ± 0 | 5.5 ± 0.2 | 45.6% ± 1.6 | |||||
| 38 | TV2 | 14.6 ± 0.7 | 97.1 ± 0.1 | 5.4 ± 0.4 | 21% ± 0.4 | |||||
| 39 | TV7 | 26.9 ± 0.8 | 125.4 ± 0.1 | 5.5 ± 0.4 | 31.9% ± 0.1 | |||||
| 40 | TV9 | 26 ± 0.8 | 173 ± 0.1 | 5.5 ± 0.4 | 28.7% ± 0.3 | |||||
| 41 | TV13 | 13.1 ± 0.1 | 124.2 ± 0 | 5.5 ± 0.2 | 23.6% ± 0.9 | |||||
| 42 | TV15 | 18.1 ± 0.2 | 74.9 ± 0 | 4.5 ± 0.2 | 23.4% ± 0.3 | |||||
| 43 | NT4 | 34.4 ± 0.1 | 234.7± 0.1 | 6.2 ± 0.2 | 33.8% ± 0.7 | |||||
| 44 | NT5 | 26.8 ± 0.7 | 124 ± 0.1 | 4.3 ± 0.3 | 21.7% ± 0.6 | |||||
| 45 | NT8 | 12.8 ± 0.8 | 65.5 ± 0 | 5.5 ± 0.4 | 24% ± 0.7 | |||||
| 46 | RR10 | 12.6 ± 1.2 | 132.3 ± 0 | 3.8 ± 0.1 | 18.1% ± 0.4 | |||||
| 47 | RR14 | 29 ± 0 | 177.8 ± 0 | 4.8 ± 0.2 | 18.1% ± 0.3 | |||||
| 48 | RR16 | 34.1 ± 0.2 | 117.7 ± 0.1 | 5.7 ± 0.2 | 17.8% ± 0.7 | |||||
*Mean value (all values are triplicate) ± Standard deviation (SD), + means positive activity and—means no activity
The most promising 15 isolates and their antagonistic activity, antifungal mechanisms along with their PGP traits and general assessment and ranking for their ability to function as PGPR.
| StrainCode | Antagonistic activities | Antifungal traits | PGP traits | Total Ass. (34) | Rank | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GI percentage (%) | ||||||||||||||||
| Ns | Pt | Ce | Gc | Rs | Fo | Sid | Chi | Pro | Cel | IAA | PS | Am | ACC | |||
| GN14 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 31 | 1st |
| TTD7 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 30 | 2nd |
| TV1 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 25 | 3rd |
| TTD5 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 23 | 4th |
| GT7 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 22 | 5th |
| BT2 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 21 | 6th |
| NT4 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 21 | 6th |
| BT15 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 20 | 7th |
| GT20 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 20 | 7th |
| GT32 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 20 | 7th |
| TTD15 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 19 | 8th |
| GT34 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 19 | 8th |
| BT6 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 18 | 9th |
| TTD19 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 15 | 10th |
| TV9 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 15 | 10th |
aNs—Nigrospora sphaerica,
bPt—Pestalotiopsis theae,
cCe—Curvularia eragrostidis,
dGc—Glomerellacingulata,
eRs—Rhizoctonia solani,
fFo—Fusarium oxysporum,
gSid—Siderophore production,
hChi—Chitinase production,
iPro—Protease production,
jCel—Cellulase production,
kIAA—Indole acetic acid production,
lPS—Phosphate solubilization,
mAm—Ammonia production,
nACC—ACC deaminase production,
oTotal assessment score, GI—Growth inhibition.
Fig 3Evaluation of different PGP parameters to show the effect of treatments in two different varieties of tea clones TV-1 and Teenali-17in nursery conditions.
(A) shoot length, (B) root length, (C) fresh shoot weight, (D) fresh root weight, (E) dry shoot weight, (F) dry root weight and (G) number of leaves. Values having different superscripts (a-i) differ significantly (P < 0.05). [Control (without bacterial inoculums), CF (N:P:K in 2:1:2 mixture), Treatment1 (strain TT5), Treatment 2 (strain TTD21), Treatment 3 (strain BT22), Treatment 4 (strain NT5), Treatment 5 (strain TTD5+ strain TTD21), Treatment 6 (strain TTD5+ strain BT22), Treatment 7 (strain TTD5+ strain NT5), Treatment 8 (strain TTD21+ strain BT22), Treatment 9 (strain TTD21+ strain NT5), Treatment 10 (strain BT22+ strain NT5) and Treatment 11 (strain TTD5+ strain TTD21+ strain BT22 + strain NT5)].
Fig 4PCA analysis showed the effect of PGPR treatments on plant growth parameters of two different varieties of tea clones TV-1 and Teenali-17 in nursery conditions.
The PCA analysis was performed taking the plant growth parameters of root and shoot length, fresh and dry roots and shoots weight and number of tea leaves. (A) and (B) showing the treatment 11 and commercial fertilizer (CF) clustered closer to each other which showed significantly increased in plant growth parameters than the control and other treatments. (The r1, r2, r3, r4 and r5 in the PCA plot are representing the five replications for each treatment). [Control (without bacterial inoculums), CF (N:P:K in 2:1:2 mixture), Treatment1 (strain TT5), Treatment 2 (strain TTD21), Treatment 3 (strain BT22), Treatment 4 (strain NT5), Treatment 5 (strain TTD5+ strain TTD21), Treatment 6 (strain TTD5+ strain BT22), Treatment 7 (strain TTD5+ strain NT5), Treatment 8 (strain TTD21+ strain BT22), Treatment 9 (strain TTD21+ strain NT5), Treatment 10 (strain BT22+ strain NT5) and Treatment 11 (strain TTD5+ strain TTD21+ strain BT22 + strain NT5)].
Fig 5Dendrogram generated using Dice similarity coefficient index from ARDRA banding patterns of the rhizobacterial isolates using NTSYS 2.02 software.
Based on the dendrogram generated the rhizobacterial isolates are divided into four major clusters A, B, C and D where B clustered with only Pseudomonas spp. and C clustered with only Brevibacillus spp.
Fig 6Dendrogram generated using Dice similarity coefficient index from BOX-PCR genomic fingerprints of rhizobacterial isolates using Phoretix 1D software.
Fig 7NJ-phylogenetic tree showing the evolutionary relationship between selected potential PGPR isolates and reference strains from GenBank database.
The bar represents 0.05 substitutions per site, bootstrap values (n = 1000) are displayed.
Molecular identification of 16S rRNA gene of potent rhizobacteria, sequence accession numbers and their origin.
| Sl No | Strain Code | GenBank accession no. | Base pair length | Closest sequence similarity (%) | Origin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | TTD1 | KX373959 | 1405 | North-Tukvar tea estate | |
| 2 | TTD2 | KX373960 | 1406 | North-Tukvar tea estate | |
| 3 | TTD5 | KX373961 | 1376 | North-Tukvar tea estate | |
| 4 | TTD7 | KX373962 | 1330 | North-Tukvar tea estate | |
| 5 | TTD8 | KX373963 | 1405 | North-Tukvar tea estate | |
| 6 | TTD10 | KX373964 | 1391 | North-Tukvar tea estate | |
| 7 | TTD14 | KX373965 | 1409 | North-Tukvar tea estate | |
| 8 | TTD15 | KX373966 | 1402 | North-Tukvar tea estate | |
| 9 | TTD19 | KX373967 | 1330 | North-Tukvar tea estate | |
| 10 | TTD21 | KX373968 | 1401 | North-Tukvar tea estate | |
| 11 | BT2 | KX373969 | 1409 | Barnesbeg tea estate | |
| 12 | BT6 | KX373970 | 1403 | Barnesbeg tea estate | |
| 13 | BT15 | KX373971 | 1408 | Barnesbeg tea estate | |
| 14 | BT19 | KX373972 | 1397 | Barnesbeg tea estate | |
| 15 | BT22 | KX373973 | 1398 | Barnesbeg tea estate | |
| 16 | GN2 | KX373974 | 1416 | Ging tea estate | |
| 17 | GN6 | KX373975 | 1377 | Ging tea estate | |
| 18 | GN10 | KX373976 | 1396 | Ging tea estate | |
| 19 | GN14 | KX373977 | 1389 | Ging tea estate | |
| 20 | GT7 | KX373978 | 1402 | Gielle tea estate | |
| 21 | GT12 | KX373979 | 1416 | Gielle tea estate | |
| 22 | GT20 | KX373980 | 1394 | Gielle tea estate | |
| 23 | GT32 | KX373981 | 1402 | Gielle tea estate | |
| 24 | GT33 | KX373982 | 1382 | Gielle tea estate | |
| 25 | GT34 | KX373983 | 1418 | Gielle tea estate | |
| 26 | NT4 | KX373984 | 1404 | Namringtea estate | |
| 27 | NT5 | KX373985 | 1416 | Namringtea estate | |
| 28 | RR10 | KX373986 | 1386 | Rangli-Rangliot tea estate | |
| 29 | RR16 | KX373987 | 1398 | Rangli-Rangliot tea estate | |
| 30 | TV1 | KX373988 | 1405 | Teesta Valley tea estate | |
| 31 | TV2 | KX373989 | 1370 | Teesta Valley tea estate | |
| 32 | TV9 | KX373990 | 1361 | Teesta Valley tea estate | |
| 33 | TV15 | KX373991 | 1414 | Teesta Valley tea estate |